Skip to main content
Log in

Industrial diversity and metropolitan unemployment rate

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main goal of our study is to evaluate whether or not industrial diversity helps reduce the frictional unemployment rate of a metropolitan area. We used a data set from Japan’s 118 metropolitan areas. Our analysis shows that although industrial diversity might reduce the frictional unemployment rate of a metropolitan area, its effect is not statistically significant in our model. Second, the location quotient for industries, considered to be related to types of unemployment other than frictional, has a stronger impact on unemployment rate than industrial diversity does. In particular, it was found that the location quotients for both the manufacturing and the construction industry have a negative relationship with the unemployment rate of a metropolitan area. We also discovered that the higher the percentage of graduates of post-secondary institutions there are in a metropolitan area, the lower its unemployment rate will be.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As for this point, see for example Koike(1981).

  2. Okinawa’s situation is not the same as for other prefectures. Okinawa is located about 700 km southeast of Kyushu, one of Japan’s main islands. At the end of World War II, Okinawa remained under U.S. occupation and was not returned to Japan until May of 1972, as stipulated in the Agreement between Japan and the United States of America concerning the Ryukyu Islands and the Daito Islands. Although Okinawa is only one of Japan’s prefectures, most U.S. military bases are located there, resulting in political factors which may be related to Okinawa’s exceptionally high unemployment rate.

  3. See, for example, Mizuno (1992).

  4. We also calculate the different variable of higher education ratio, which is defined as the percentage of the higher education graduates in the labor force of a metropolitan area, by dividing the number of higher education graduates that enter a labor force by the total population of over 15-year olds in a metropolitan area.

  5. See, for example, Greene (2000, p.510).

References

  • Attaran M (1986) Industrial diversity and economic performance in U. S. areas. Ann Reg Sci 20(2):44–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkume A (1982) Differentiating employment prospects by industry and returns to job search in metropolitan areas. J Urban Econ 12(1):68–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer HL (1984) Regional economic stabilization: an efficient diversification approach. Rev Reg Stud 14(1):8–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer HL (1985) Measures of diversification: predictors of regional economic instability. J Reg Sci 25(3):463–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office (2001) Annual economic and fiscal report (Nenji keizai zaisei hokoku). Cabinet Office, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy ME (1975) The concept and measurement of regional industrial diversification. South Econ J 41(3):492–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond CA, Simon CJ (1990) Industrial specialization and the returns to labor. J Labor Econ 8(2):175–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg RG, Smith RS (2003) Modern labor economics: theory and public policy. Eighth edition, Addison Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist DA, St.Louis LV (1991) Directions for diversification with an application to Saskatchewan. J Reg Sci 31(3):273–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene WH (2000) Econometric analysis. Fourth edition, Pretice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackbart MM, Anderson DA (1975) On measuring economic diversification. Land Econ 51(4):374–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higuchi Y (1996) Labor economics (Rodo keizaigaku). Toyo Keizai Shinposya, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Izraeli O, Murphy KJ (2003) The effect of industrial diversity on state unemployment rate and per capita income. Ann Reg Sci 37(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanemoto Y, Tokuoka K (2002) Metropolitan area definitions in Japan (Nihon no toshiken settei kijun). Journal of Applied Regional Science (Oyo Chiikigaku Kenkyu) 7:1–15 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Koike K (1981) Skilled laborers in Japan (Nihon no jukuren). Yuhikaku, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R (1981) A note on studentizing a test for heteroscedasticity. J Econom 17(1):107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kort J (1981) Regional economic instability and industrial diversification in the U.S. Land Econ 57(4):596–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala GS (2001) Introduction to econometrics. Third edition, Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald JF (1997) Fundamentals of urban economics. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizuno A (1992) Unemployment behavior in Japan (Nihon no shitsugyo kodo). Chuo University Press, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge MD, Rickman DS (1997) State unemployment differentials: equilibrium factors vs. differential employment growth. Growth Change 28(3):360–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen RJ (1984) Regional variations in employment and unemployment during 1970–82. Mon Labor Rev 85(2):38–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon C (1988) Frictional unemployment and the role of industrial diversity. Q J Econ 103(4):715–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon CJ, Nardinelli C (1992) Does industrial diversity always reduce unemployment? Evidence from the great depression and after. Econ Inq 30(2):384–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W (1965) A preface to urban economics. Johns Hopkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Vipond J (1974) City size and unemployment. Urban Stud 11(1):39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasylenko MJ, Erickson RA (1978) On measuring economic diversification: comment. Land Econ 54(1):106–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fumitoshi Mizutani.

Additional information

This study was accomplished within the organization of the Urban Revitalization of Kansai Region in FY2002, sponsored by Nihon Keizai Shinbun. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 43rd Congress of the European Regional Science Association, 27–30 August, 2003, University of Jyvaskyla, Finland. We would like to thank both the project members and participants at the congress for their discussion and comments on the earlier version. We would especially like to thank Hitoshi Akiyama (UFJ Research Institute), Kyoichi Futagami (Osaka University), Takenori Inoki (International Japanese Culture Research Center), Yoshiaki Shikano (Doshisya University) and Michihiko Tachi (Nihon Keizai Shinbun). Part of this study was financially supported by the 21st Century COE program (the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology) of the Kobe University, Graduate School of Business Administration.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mizuno, K., Mizutani, F. & Nakayama, N. Industrial diversity and metropolitan unemployment rate. Ann Reg Sci 40, 157–172 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-005-0046-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-005-0046-2

JEL Classification

Navigation