Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

ACL surgical trends evolve in the last five years for young European surgeons: results of the survey among the U45 ESSKA members

  • SPORTS MEDICINE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Although the outcomes of ACL reconstruction are generally satisfying, there are several patients who do not regain their pre-injury sporting level and suffer persistent symptoms. Orthopaedic practice has evolved significantly over the last five years to address these drawbacks. The aim of the present survey was to analyze the changes in the approach to ACL reconstruction among a population of young ESSKA surgeons dedicated to ACL surgery.

Methods

The survey was uploaded on the ESSKA website and was accessible to members under the age of 45. The ESSKA society has 1035 U45 members involved in multiple aspects of Orthopaedic practice. One hundred and forty questionnaires were returned. Several aspects of ACL surgery were investigated at baseline and 5 years prior. They included general details such as the volume of ACL reconstructions per surgeon per year, the graft choice in cases of low and high demanding patients, the technique for femoral tunnel drilling and the preferred device for femoral fixation. The approach to the management of damage to peripheral structures, as well as meniscal ramp and root tears were also investigated.

Results

Hamstrings and quadrupled semitendinosus were the preferred graft choice in low-demanding patients (92.9%) while quadriceps tendon is gaining popularity in contact sport practitioners (from 4.3 to 10.7%). The percentage of surgeons using femoral screws had decreased from 37.9 to 29.3 while the percentage of those who used buttons increased from 52.9 to 69.3%. Extra-articular procedures (antero-lateral ligament (ALL) or lateral tenodesis have become popular. The percentage of surgeons who perform an additional peripheral reconstruction rose from 28.5 to 71.5%. Of those who perform the meniscal repair more than 50% of patients rose from 14.3 to 27.9%. Similarly, the percentage of surgeons who performed a medial meniscus ramp lesion repair rose from 29.4 to 54.7%. While the percentage of those who choose to perform a transtibial pull-out repair of lateral meniscus root tears significantly rose from 17.9 to 59.3%.

Conclusions

The present survey among under 45 years old ESSKA surgeons yields some notable findings. The new evidence on the impact of injuries on peripheral structures and menisci is stimulating surgeons towards a more anatomic approach if identified at the time of ACL reconstruction. This evidence will probably influence future research and decision-making.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahn JH, Bae TS, Kang KS, Kang SY, Lee SH (2011) Longitudinal tear of the medial meniscus posterior horn in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee significantly influences anterior stability. Am J Sports Med 39(10):2187–2193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511416597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allaire R, Muriuki M, Gilbertson L, Harner CD (2008) Biomechanical consequences of a tear of the posterior root of the medial meniscus. Similar to total meniscectomy. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90(9):1922–1931. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA (2011) Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. Br J Sports Med 5(7):596–606. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2010.076364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arnold MP, Calcei JG, Vogel N, Magnussen RA, Clatworthy M, Spalding T, Campbell JD, Bergfeld JA, Sherman SL, ACL Study Group (2021) ACL study group survey reveals the evolution of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft choice over the past three decades. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29(11):3871–3876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06443-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cerciello S, Batailler C, Darwich N, Neyret P (2018) Extra-articular tenodesis in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an overview. Clin Sports Med 37(1):87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2017.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen L, Linde-Rosen M, Hwang SC, Zhou J, Xie Q, Smolinski P, Fu FH (2015) The effect of medial meniscal horn injury on knee stability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(1):126–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3241-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper DE (1998) Biomechanical properties of the central third patellar tendon graft: effect of rotation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6(1):S16-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001670050217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cuzzolin M, Previtali D, Delcogliano M, Filardo G, Candrian C, Grassi A (2021) Independent versus transtibial drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis with meta-regression. Orthop J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671211015616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eysturoy NH, Nissen KA, Nielsen T, Lind M (2018) The influence of graft fixation methods on revision percentages after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 46(3):524–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517748924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Forkel P, Herbort M, Schulze M, Rosenbaum D, Kirstein L, Raschke M, Petersen W (2013) Biomechanical consequences of a posterior root tear of the lateral meniscus: stabilizing effect of the meniscofemoral ligament. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(5):621–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1716-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamner DL, Brown CH Jr, Steiner ME, Hecker AT, Hayes WC (1999) Hamstring tendon grafts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: biomechanical evaluation of the use of multiple strands and tensioning techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 181(4):549–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hardy A, Casabianca L, Andrieu K, Baverel L, Noailles T, Junior French Arthroscopy Society (2017) Complications following harvesting of patellar tendon or hamstring tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: systematic review of literature. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103(8):S245–S248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2017.09.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Middleton KK, Hamilton T, Irrgang JJ, Karlsson J, Harner CD, Fu FH (2014) Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a global perspective. Part 1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(7):1467–1482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2846-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Monaco E, Ferretti A, Labianca L, Maestri B, Speranza A, Kelly MJ, D’Arrigo C (2012) Navigated knee kinematics after cutting of the ACL and its secondary restraint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(5):870–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1640-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mouarbes D, Menetrey J, Marot V, Courtot L, Berard E, Cavaignac E (2019) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes for quadriceps tendon autograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring-tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 47(14):3531–3540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518825340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Parsons EM, Gee AO, Spiekerman C, Cavanagh PR (2015) The biomechanical function of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. Am J Sports Med 43:669–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514562751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Peltier A, Lording T, Maubisson L, Ballis R, Neyret P, Lustig S (2015) The role of the meniscotibial ligament in posteromedial rotational knee stability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2967–2973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3751-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Proietti L, Ciolli G, Corona K, Cerciello S (2021) Regarding “What are the primary cost drivers of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States? A cost-minimization analysis of 14,713 patients.” Arthroscopy 37(5):1369–1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.03.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Robin BN, Jani SS, Marvil SC, Reid JB, Schillhammer CK, Lubowitz JH (2015) Advantages and disadvantages of transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in femoral tunnel drilling in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 31(7):1412–1417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2015.01.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Samuelsen BT, Webster KE, Johnson NR, Hewett TE, Krych AJ (2017) Hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction: is there a difference in graft failure percentage? A meta-analysis of 47,613 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475(10):2459–2468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5278-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shani RH, Umpierez E, Nasert M, Hiza EA, Xerogeanes J (2016) Biomechanical comparison of quadriceps and patellar tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 32(1):71–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sherman SL, Calcei J, Ray T, Magnussen RA, Musahl V, Kaeding CC, Clatworthy M, Bergfeld JA, Arnold MP (2021) ACL study group presents the global trends in ACL reconstruction: biennial survey of the ACL study group. J ISAKOS 6(6):322–328. https://doi.org/10.1136/jisakos-2020-000567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sonnery-Cottet B, Thaunat M, Freychet B, Pupim BH, Murphy CG, Claes S (2015) Outcome of a combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction technique with minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 43:1598–1605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515571571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Spragg LM, Prentice HA, Morris A, Funahashi TT, Maletis GB, Csintalan RP (2019) Femoral-tibial fixation affects risk of revision and reoperation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(11):3518–3526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05431-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Staubli HU, Schatzmann L, Brunner P, Rincon L, Nolte LP (1999) Mechanical tensile properties of the quadriceps tendon and patellar ligament in young adults. Am J Sports Med 27:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465990270011301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stephen JM, Halewood C, Kittl C, Bollen SR, Williams A, Amis AA (2016) Posteromedial meniscocapsular lesions increase tibiofemoral joint laxity with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency, and their repair reduces laxity. Am J Sports Med 44:400–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515617454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tibor L, Chan PH, Funahashi TT, Wyatt R, Maletis GB, Inacio MC (2016) Surgical technique trends in primary ACL reconstruction from 2007 to 2014. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98(13):1079–1089. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.00881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Eck CF, Schreiber VM, Mejia HA, Samuelsson K, Van Dijk CN, Karlsson J, Fu F (2010) “Anatomic” anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of surgical techniques and reporting of surgical data. Arthroscopy. 26(9):S2–S12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2010.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Webster KE, Feller JA, Hartnett N, Leigh WB, Richmond AK (2016) Comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 15-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 44(1):83–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515611886

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study and all authors have received no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. A. Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy

    S. Cerciello

  2. Marrelli Hospital, Crotone, Italy

    S. Cerciello

  3. Casa Di Cura Villa Betania, Rome, Italy

    S. Cerciello

  4. Institute for Locomotion, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Aix Marseille University, APHM, CNRS, ISM, Sainte‑Marguerite Hospital, Marseille, France

    M. Ollivier

  5. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Acibadem University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

    B. Kocaoglu

  6. King’s College, London, UK

    R. S. Khakha

  7. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg‑Clinique, D’Eich 78 Rue d’Eich, 1460, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

    R. Seil

  8. Sports Medicine Research Laboratory, Luxembourg Institute of Health, 76 Rue d’Eich, 1460, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

    R. Seil

  9. Sports Medicine and Science, Luxembourg Institute of Research in Orthopaedics, 76 Rue d’Eich, 1460, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

    R. Seil

Authors
  1. S. Cerciello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Ollivier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Kocaoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. S. Khakha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. Seil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

The ESSKA U45 Committee

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Cerciello.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval is not applicable to a survey.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cerciello, S., Ollivier, M., Kocaoglu, B. et al. ACL surgical trends evolve in the last five years for young European surgeons: results of the survey among the U45 ESSKA members. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31, 619–625 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07005-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07005-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation