Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair without antibiotic prophylaxis does not increase the infection rate

  • SHOULDER
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Rotator cuff repair is a commonly performed shoulder procedure. In the past 20 years, there has been a shift from mini-open towards arthroscopic repair, and many units exclusively use arthroscopic techniques for rotator cuff surgery. The aim of this study was to find out whether withholding antibiotics had any effect on the infection rate in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 336 consecutive patients with an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) and a minimum 2-year follow-up was performed. The control group received prophylactic antibiotics (controls) and the cases of interest did not receive perioperative antibiotics. A power analysis was performed according to literature regarding infection proportions. The primary outcome was an infection (superficial or deep) in the operated shoulder.

Results

There were 336 patients who underwent a RCR. Two-hundred-and-twelve in the control group and 124 in the non-antibiotic group. Average ages were 57.3 ± 12.5 and 56.8 ± 13.2 years in each group, respectively. The follow-up times ranged from 24 to 76 months. Equipment used and surgical techniques were identical, only operating times were statistically different between the groups (control 77.2 ± 41.3 min versus no antibiotic cases 52.9 ± 16.7 min) (p = 0.000009). There was no recorded infection in either group.

Conclusion

Infection following arthroscopic surgery is uncommon. Small incisions, constant lavage with saline, minimal hardware insertion and short operating times all combine to minimise the risks. Current results point towards no detriment in withholding prophylactic antibiotics in low-risk patients undergoing routine rotator cuff repair surgery. Therefore, judicious use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing this procedure is advocated to prevent potential harm to those it is administered to.

Level of evidence

Level III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data has been presented in this manuscript. The data are anonymous. Further data are not available.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Almansoori KA, Clark M (2015) Increasing trends in orthopedic fellowships are not due to inadequate residency training. Educ Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/191470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Babu S, Al-Obaidi B, Jardine A, Jonas S, Al-Hadithy N, Satish V (2020) A comparative study of 5 different antibiotic prophylaxis regimes in 4500 total knee replacements. J Clin Orthop Trauma 11:108–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baraza N, Leith J (2018) Are prophylactic intravenous antibiotics required in routine shoulder arthroscopic surgery? A systematic review of the literature. Joints 6:54–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Besnard M, Babusiaux D, Garaud P, Rosset P, Bernard L, Le Nail LR et al (2018) Impact of setting up a bone and joint infection referral center on arthroscopic treatment of septic arthritis of the knee and shoulder: retrospective study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104:1265–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brophy RH, Bansal A, Rogalski BL, Rizzo MG, Weiner EJ, Wolff BD et al (2019) Risk factors for surgical site infections after orthopaedic surgery in the ambulatory surgical center setting. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 27:e928–e934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bryson DJ, Morris DL, Shivji FS, Rollins KR, Snape S, Ollivere BJ (2016) Antibiotic prophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery: difficult decisions in an era of evolving antibiotic resistance. Bone Joint J 98-B:1014–1019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burke JF (1961) The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions. Surgery 50:161–168

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng H, Chen BP, Soleas IM, Ferko NC, Cameron CG, Hinoul P (2017) Prolonged operative duration increases risk of surgical site infections: a systematic review. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 18:722–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chuang MJ, Jancosko JJ, Mendoza V, Nottage WM (2015) The incidence of propionibacterium acnes in shoulder arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 31:1702–1707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Compagnoni R, Randelli P (2020) Correlation between corticosteroid injections and surgical site infections in shoulder arthroscopy. Ann Transl Med 8:513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Daniels AH, DiGiovanni CW (2014) Is subspecialty fellowship training emerging as a necessary component of contemporary orthopaedic surgery education? J Grad Med Educ 6:218–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Forsythe B, Agarwalla A, Puzzitiello RN, Sumner S, Romeo AA, Mascarenhas R (2019) The timing of injections prior to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair impacts the risk of surgical site infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 101:682–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gillespie WJ, Walenkamp GH (2010) Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery for proximal femoral and other closed long bone fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000244.pub2CD000244

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Jensen AR, Cha PS, Devana SK, Ishmael C, Pauli Di, von Treuheim T, D’Oro A et al (2017) Evaluation of the trends, concomitant procedures, and complications with open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs in the medicare population. Orthop J Sports Med 5:2325967117731310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kurzweil PR (2006) Antibiotic prophylaxis for arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy 22:452–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li B, Webster TJ (2018) Bacteria antibiotic resistance: new challenges and opportunities for implant-associated orthopedic infections. J Orthop Res 36:22–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liang Z, Rong K, Gu W, Yu X, Fang R, Deng Y et al (2019) Surgical site infection following elective orthopaedic surgeries in geriatric patients: incidence and associated risk factors. Int Wound J 16:773–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lidwell OM, Lowbury EJ, Whyte W, Blowers R, Stanley SJ, Lowe D (1984) Infection and sepsis after operations for total hip or knee-joint replacement: influence of ultraclean air, prophylactic antibiotics and other factors. J Hyg (Lond) 93:505–529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mather RC 3rd, Koenig L, Acevedo D, Dall TM, Gallo P, Romeo A et al (2013) The societal and economic value of rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1993–2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Najjar YW, Saleh MY (2017) Orthopedic surgical site infection: incidence, predisposing factors, and prevention. Int J Med Sci Clin Invention. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijmsci/v4i2.04

  21. Pauzenberger L, Grieb A, Hexel M, Laky B, Anderl W, Heuberer P (2017) Infections following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: incidence, risk factors, and prophylaxis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:595–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Peersman G, Laskin R, Davis J, Peterson M (2001) Infection in total knee replacement: a retrospective review of 6489 total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Prokuski L (2008) Prophylactic antibiotics in orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16:283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rafati M, Shiva A, Ahmadi A, Habibi O (2014) Adherence to American society of health-system pharmacists surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines in a teaching hospital. J Res Pharm Pract 3:62–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Slobogean GP (2019) CORR insights(R): is there a difference in infection risk between single and multiple doses of prophylactic antibiotics? A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 477:1591–1593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tan TL, Shohat N, Rondon AJ, Foltz C, Goswami K, Ryan SP et al (2019) Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty: a single dose is as effective as multiple doses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 101:429–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Voss A, Pfeifer CG, Kerschbaum M, Rupp M, Angele P, Alt V (2021) Post-operative septic arthritis after arthroscopy: modern diagnostic and therapeutic concepts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06525-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Warnock M, Ogonda L, Yew P, McIlvenny G (2019) Antibiotic Prophylaxis protocols and surgical site infection rates in trauma surgery: a prospective regional study of 26,849 procedures. Ulster Med J 88:111–114

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wukich DK (2015) Diabetes and its negative impact on outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. World J Orthop 6:331–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang J, Zhang X, Liang W (2020) A retrospective analysis of factors affecting surgical site infection in orthopaedic patients. J Int Med Res 48:300060520907776

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yeranosian MG, Arshi A, Terrell RD, Wang JC, McAllister DR, Petrigliano FA (2014) Incidence of acute postoperative infections requiring reoperation after arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Am J Sports Med 42:437–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NB and JML developed the project. NB and MJKS performed the data collection. NB, MJKS and JML analysed and interpreted the data. NB, MJKS and JML wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maciej J. K. Simon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Jordan Leith teaches intermittently courses for Arthrex. All other authors certify that they have no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licencing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted manuscript.

Ethical approval

Ethics approval was obtained for the study from the University of British Columbia research ethics board (CREB H21-01045).

Informed consent

Informed consent for participation and publication was obtained from all participants. The study was carried in accordance with the latest declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baraza, N., Simon, M.J.K. & Leith, J.M. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair without antibiotic prophylaxis does not increase the infection rate. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29, 3956–3960 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06664-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06664-y

Keywords

Navigation