Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Low annual hospital volume of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is not associated with higher revision rates

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Surgery performed in low-volume centres has been associated with longer operating time, longer hospital stays, lower functional outcomes, and higher rates of revision surgery, complications and mortality. This has been reported consistently in the arthroplasty literature, but there is a paucity of data regarding the relationship between surgical volume and outcome following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose was to compare ACL reconstruction failure rates between hospitals performing different annual surgical volumes.

Methods

All patients from the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register having primary autograft ACL reconstruction between 2004 and 2016 were included. Hospital volume was divided into quintiles based on the number of ACL reconstructions performed annually, defined arbitrarily as: 1–12 (V1), 13–24 (V2), 25–49 (V3), 50–99 (V4) and ≥ 100 (V5) annual procedures. Kaplan–Meier estimated survival curves and survival percentages were calculated with revision ACL reconstruction as the end point. Secondary outcome measures included (1) mean change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Quality of Life (QoL) and Sport subsections from pre-operative to 5-year follow-up and (2) subjective failure defined as KOOS QoL < 44.

Results

Twenty thousand eight hundred and fifty patients met the inclusion criteria and 1195 (5.7%) underwent subsequent revision ACL reconstruction over the study period. Revision rates were lower in the lower volume hospitals compared with the higher volume hospitals (p < 0.001). There was no clinically significant difference in improvement between pre-operative and 5-year follow-up KOOS scores between hospital volume categories, but a higher proportion of patients having surgery at lower volume hospitals reported a subjective failure. Patients in the lower volume categories (V1-3) were more often male and older compared to the higher volume hospitals (V4-5). Concomitant meniscal injuries and participation in pivoting sports were most common in V5 compared with V1 (p < 0.001). Median operative time decreased as hospital volume increased, ranging from 90 min at V1 hospitals to 56 min at V5 hospitals (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Patients having ACL reconstruction at lower volume hospitals had a lower rate of subsequent revision surgery relative to higher volume hospitals. However, complications occurred more frequently, operative duration was longer, and the number of patients reporting a subjective failure of ACL reconstruction was highest at these lower volume hospitals.

Level of evidence

Level III

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahldén M, Samuelsson K, Sernert N, Forssblad M, Karlsson J, Kartus J (2012) The Swedish national anterior cruciate ligament register: a report on baseline variables and outcomes of surgery for almost 18,000 patients. Am J Sports Med 40:2230–2235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Andernord D, Björnsson H, Petzold M, Eriksson BI, Forssblad M, Karlsson J, Samuelsson K (2014) Surgical predictors of early revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Swedish national knee ligament register on 13,102 patients. Am J Sports Med 42:1574–1582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA (2011) Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. Br J Sports Med 45:596–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arias-de la Torre J, Pons-Cabrafiga M, Valderas JM, Evans JP, Martín V, Molina AJ, Pallisó F, Smith K, Martinez O, Espallargues M (2019) Influence of hospital volume of procedures by year on the risk of revision of total hip and knee arthroplasties: a propensity score-matched cohort study. J Clin Med 8:670. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8050670

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Badawy M, Espehaug B, Indrekvam K, Engesæter LB, Havelin LI, Furnes O (2013) Influence of hospital volume on revision rate after total knee arthroplasty with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:e131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, Harron K, Moher D, Petersen I, Sørensen HT, von Elm E, Langan SM, RECORD Working Committee (2015) The REporting of studies conducted using observational routinely-collected health data (RECORD) statement. PLOS Med 12:e1001885

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Van den Broeck T, Oprea-Lager D, Moris L, Kailavasan M, Briers E, Cornford P, De Santis M, Gandaglia G, Gillessen Sommer S, Grummet JP, Grivas N, Lam TBL, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason M, O’Hanlon S, Pecanka J, Ploussard G, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, Tilki D, van den Bergh RCN, van der Poel H, Wiegel T, Willemse P-P, Yuan CY, Mottet N (2021) A systematic review of the impact of surgeon and hospital caseload volume on oncological and nononcological outcomes after radical prostatectomy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.04.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruins HM, Veskimäe E, Hernández V, Neuzillet Y, Cathomas R, Compérat EM, Cowan NC, Gakis G, Espinós EL, Lorch A, Ribal MJ, Rouanne M, Thalmann GN, Yuan Y, van Heijden AG, Witjes JA (2020) The importance of hospital and surgeon volume as major determinants of morbidity and mortality after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review and recommendations by the European association of urology muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer guideline panel. Eur Urol Oncol 3:131–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cristiani R, Forssblad M, Edman G, Eriksson K, Stålman A (2021) Age, time from injury to surgery and quadriceps strength affect the risk of revision surgery after primary ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06517-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Dimick JB, Cattaneo SM, Lipsett PA, Pronovost PJ, Heitmiller RF (2001) Hospital volume is related to clinical and economic outcomes of esophageal resection in Maryland. Ann Thorac Surg 72:334–339 (discussion 339-341)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Glasgow RE, Showstack JA, Katz PP, Corvera CU, Warren RS, Mulvihill SJ (1999) The relationship between hospital volume and outcomes of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Arch Surg 134:30–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Granan L-P, Bahr R, Steindal K, Furnes O, Engebretsen L (2008) Development of a national cruciate ligament surgery registry: the Norwegian national knee ligament registry. Am J Sports Med 36:308–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Granan L-P, Baste V, Engebretsen L, Inacio MCS (2015) Associations between inadequate knee function detected by KOOS and prospective graft failure in an anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1135–1140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grassi A, Kim C, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Zaffagnini S, Amendola A (2017) What is the mid-term failure rate of revision ACL reconstruction? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat 475:2484–2499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR (2002) Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med 137:511–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamrin Senorski E, Svantesson E, Baldari A, Ayeni OR, Engebretsen L, Franceschi F, Karlsson J, Samuelsson K (2019) Factors that affect patient reported outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-a systematic review of the Scandinavian knee ligament registers. Br J Sports Med 53:410–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamrin Senorski E, Svantesson E, Engebretsen L, Lind M, Forssblad M, Karlsson J, Samuelsson K (2019) 15 years of the Scandinavian knee ligament registries: lessons, limitations and likely prospects. Br J Sports Med 53:1259–1260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Harmon JW, Tang DG, Gordon TA, Bowman HM, Choti MA, Kaufman HS, Bender JS, Duncan MD, Magnuson TH, Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL (1999) Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection. Ann Surg 230:404–411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Haughton DN, Wheelton AN, McLauchlan GJ (2021) Revision knee arthroplasty: can good outcomes be achieved at lower volumes? Knee 30:63–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Heck DA, Robinson RL, Partridge CM, Lubitz RM, Freund DA (1998) Patient outcomes after knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:93–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Herbst E, Hoser C, Gföller P, Hepperger C, Abermann E, Neumayer K, Musahl V, Fink C (2017) Impact of surgical timing on the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:569–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hervey SL, Purves HR, Guller U, Toth AP, Vail TP, Pietrobon R (2003) Provider volume of total knee arthroplasties and patient outcomes in the HCUP-nationwide inpatient sample. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1775–1783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hsieh C-E, Hsu Y-L, Lin K-H, Lin P-Y, Hung Y-J, Lai Y-C, Weng L-C, Chen Y-L (2021) Association between surgical volumes and hospital mortality in patients: a living donor liver transplantation single center experience. BMC Gastroenterol 21:228

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ingelsrud LH, Terwee CB, Terluin B, Granan L-P, Engebretsen L, Mills KAG, Roos EM (2018) Meaningful change scores in the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 46:1120–1128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jain N, Pietrobon R, Guller U, Shankar A, Ahluwalia AS, Higgins LD (2005) Effect of provider volume on resource utilization for surgical procedures of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:302–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ju MR, Blackwell J-M, Zeh HJ, Yopp AC, Wang SC, Porembka MR (2021) Redefining high-volume gastric cancer centers: the impact of operative volume on surgical outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09655-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Katz JN, Mahomed NN, Baron JA, Barrett JA, Fossel AH, Creel AH, Wright J, Wright EA, Losina E (2007) Association of hospital and surgeon procedure volume with patient-centered outcomes of total knee replacement in a population-based cohort of patients age 65 years and older. Arthritis Rheum 56:568–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Katz JN, Phillips CB, Baron JA, Fossel AH, Mahomed NN, Barrett J, Lingard EA, Harris WH, Poss R, Lew RA, Guadagnoli E, Wright EA, Losina E (2003) Association of hospital and surgeon volume of total hip replacement with functional status and satisfaction three years following surgery. Arthritis Rheum 48:560–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Konow T, Baetz J, Melsheimer O, Grimberg A, Morlock M (2021) Factors influencing periprosthetic femoral fracture risk. Bone Joint J 103:650–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Leroux T, Ogilvie-Harris D, Dwyer T, Chahal J, Gandhi R, Mahomed N, Wasserstein D (2014) The risk of knee arthroplasty following cruciate ligament reconstruction: a population-based matched cohort study. J Bone Jt Surg 96:2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Leroux T, Wasserstein D, Dwyer T, Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Marks PH, Bach BR, Townley JB, Mahomed N, Chahal J (2014) The epidemiology of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in Ontario, Canada. Am J Sports Med 42:2666–2672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lyman S, Koulouvaris P, Sherman S, Do H, Mandl LA, Marx RG (2009) Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: trends, readmissions, and subsequent knee surgery. J Bone Jt Surg 91:2321–2328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Malik AT, Panni UY, Masri BA, Noordin S (2018) The impact of surgeon volume and hospital volume on postoperative mortality and morbidity after hip fractures: a systematic review. Int J Surg 54:316–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Meyer E, Weitzel-Kage D, Sohr D, Gastmeier P (2011) Impact of department volume on surgical site infections following arthroscopy, knee replacement or hip replacement. BMJ Qual Saf 20:1069–1074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ogawa T, Jinno T, Moriwaki M, Yoshii T, Nazarian A, Fushimi K, Okawa A (2021) Association between hospital surgical volume and complications after total hip arthroplasty in femoral neck fracture: a propensity score-matched cohort study. Injury. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.02.092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Oh TK, Song IA (2021) Hospital case volume, health care providers, and mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a nationwide cohort study in South Korea. Korean Circ J. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2020.0443

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. van Oost I, Koenraadt KLM, van Steenbergen LN, Bolder SBT, van Geenen RCI (2020) Higher risk of revision for partial knee replacements in low absolute volume hospitals: data from 18,134 partial knee replacements in the Dutch arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop 91:426–432

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Pamilo KJ, Peltola M, Paloneva J, Mäkelä K, Häkkinen U, Remes V (2015) Hospital volume affects outcome after total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 86:41–47

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Persson A, Gifstad T, Lind M, Engebretsen L, Fjeldsgaard K, Drogset JO, Forssblad M, Espehaug B, Kjellsen AB, Fevang JM (2018) Graft fixation influences revision risk after ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts. Acta Orthop 89:204–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Prentice HA, Lind M, Mouton C, Persson A, Magnusson H, Gabr A, Seil R, Engebretsen L, Samuelsson K, Karlsson J, Forssblad M, Haddad FS, Spalding T, Funahashi TT, Paxton LW, Maletis GB (2018) Patient demographic and surgical characteristics in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a description of registries from six countries. Br J Sports Med 52:716–722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rahardja R, Zhu M, Love H, Clatworthy MG, Monk AP, Young SW (2020) Rates of revision and surgeon-reported graft rupture following ACL reconstruction: early results from the New Zealand ACL Registry. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:2194–2202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Register, Norwegian Hip Fracture Register, and Norwegian Paediatric Hip Register (2019) Annual Report. Annual Report, Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Arthroplasty and Hip Fractures, Bergen, Norway, p 249

  43. Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Register, Norwegian Hip Fracture Register, and Norwegian Paediatric Hip Register (2020) Annual Report. Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Arthroplasty and Hip Fractures, Bergen, Norway, p 376

  44. Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Register, Norwegian Hip Fracture Register, and Norwegian Paediatric Hip Register (2015) Annual Report. Annual Report, Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Arthroplasty and Hip Fractures, Bergen, Norway, p 273

  45. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)–development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:88–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Scott DJ, Sherman S, Dhawan A, Cole BJ, Bach BR, Mather RC (2015) Quantifying the economic impact of provider volume through adverse events: the case of sports medicine. Orthop J Sports Med 3:232596711557447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Singh JA, Kwoh CK, Boudreau RM, Lee G-C, Ibrahim SA (2011) Hospital volume and surgical outcomes after elective hip/knee arthroplasty: a risk-adjusted analysis of a large regional database. Arthritis Rheum 63:2531–2539

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Snaebjörnsson T, Hamrin Senorski E, Svantesson E, Westin O, Persson A, Karlsson J, Samuelsson K (2019) Graft fixation and timing of surgery are predictors of early anterior cruciate ligament revision: a cohort study from the Swedish and Norwegian knee ligament registries based on 18,425 patients. JB JS Open Access 4:e0037

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Snaebjörnsson T, Hamrin-Senorski E, Svantesson E, Karlsson L, Engebretsen L, Karlsson J, Samuelsson K (2019) Graft diameter and graft type as predictors of anterior cruciate ligament revision: a cohort study including 18,425 patients from the Swedish and Norwegian national knee ligament registries. J Bone Joint Surg Am 101:1812–1820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Snaebjörnsson T, Svantesson E, Sundemo D, Westin O, Sansone M, Engebretsen L, Hamrin-Senorski E (2019) Young age and high BMI are predictors of early revision surgery after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study from the Swedish and Norwegian knee ligament registries based on 30,747 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:3583–3591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Svantesson E, Hamrin Senorski E, Baldari A, Ayeni OR, Engebretsen L, Franceschi F, Karlsson J, Samuelsson K (2019) Factors associated with additional anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and register comparison: a systematic review on the Scandinavian knee ligament registers. Br J Sports Med 53:418–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Taylor HD, Dennis DA, Crane HS (1997) Relationship between mortality rates and hospital patient volume for Medicare patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery of the hip, knee, spine, and femur. J Arthroplast 12:235–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Wasserstein D, Dwyer T, Gandhi R, Austin PC, Mahomed N, Ogilvie-Harris D (2013) A matched-cohort population study of reoperation after meniscal repair with and without concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 41:349–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Webster KE, Feller JA (2016) Exploring the high reinjury rate in younger patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 44:2827–2832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Webster KE, Feller JA, Leigh WB, Richmond AK (2014) Younger patients are at increased risk for graft rupture and contralateral injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 42:641–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Wyatt RWB, Inacio MCS, Liddle KD, Maletis GB (2013) Factors associated with meniscus repair in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 41:2766–2771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Yapp LZ, Walmsley PJ, Moran M, Clarke JV, Simpson AHRW, Scott CEH (2021) The effect of hospital case volume on re-revision following revision total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 103:602–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Ytterstad K, Granan L-P, Ytterstad B, Steindal K, Fjeldsgaard KA, Furnes O, Engebretsen L (2012) Registration rate in the Norwegian cruciate ligament register: large-volume hospitals perform better. Acta Orthop 83:174–178

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhang Y, McCammon J, Martin RK, Prior HJ, Leiter J, MacDonald PB (2018) Epidemiological trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a Canadian province. Clin J Sport Med 30:e207–e213

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received in support of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    R. Kyle Martin

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, 1900 CentraCare Circle, Saint Cloud, MN, 56303, USA

    R. Kyle Martin

  3. Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway

    Andreas Persson, Gilbert Moatshe, Lars Engebretsen & Håvard Visnes

  4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Martina Hansens Hospital, Baerum, Norway

    Andreas Persson

  5. Norwegian National Knee Ligament Register, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

    Andreas Persson, Anne Marie Fenstad, Jon Olav Drogset & Håvard Visnes

  6. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

    Gilbert Moatshe & Lars Engebretsen

  7. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway

    Jon Olav Drogset

  8. Department of Orthopaedics, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway

    Håvard Visnes

Authors
  1. R. Kyle Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas Persson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gilbert Moatshe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anne Marie Fenstad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lars Engebretsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jon Olav Drogset
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Håvard Visnes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Kyle Martin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All patients participating in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register (NKLR) have provided informed consent. Based on this consent, the NKLR her permission from the Norwegian Data Inspectorate to collect, analyze, and publish on health data. The registration of data and the present study were performed confidentially and according to Norwegian and EU data protection rules, with all data de-identified prior to retrieval from the NKLR. The Regional Ethics Committee (REK) has previously determined that it is not necessary to obtain further ethical approval for Norwegian register-based studies.

Informed consent

All patients participating in the NKLR have provided informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martin, R.K., Persson, A., Moatshe, G. et al. Low annual hospital volume of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is not associated with higher revision rates. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30, 1575–1583 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06655-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06655-z

Search

Navigation