Skip to main content
Log in

Radiological grading of osteoarthritis on Rosenberg view has a significant correlation with clinical outcomes after medial open-wedge high-tibial osteotomy

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the classification scheme for osteoarthritis severity grading that most closely correlates with postoperative clinical outcomes and to identify the positive and negative prognostic factors for medial open-wedge high-tibial osteotomy (OWHTO).

Methods

Seventy-nine consecutive patients with primary varus osteoarthritis were treated using OWHTO. Arthritic grading was determined by arthroscopic assessment according to the modified Outerbridge classification and by radiographic classification according to the Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grading scale on standing anteroposterior (AP) and 45° posteroanterior (PA) flexion weight-bearing radiography. Clinical outcome was assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), which was evaluated both preoperatively and at the postoperative 2-year follow-up after OWHTO. Multivariate regression analyses were used to explore and quantify the influence of baseline patient demographics, variables related to arthroscopic and radiological grades of arthritis, as well as postoperative alignment changes on the OKS.

Results

At the 2-year follow-up, the mean OKS had improved from 20 ± 4 to 39 ± 5 points (p < 0.001). The average mechanical femorotibial and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) changed from 6.9° ± 3.4° to valgus 2.7° ± 2.8° and from 85.6° ± 2.4° to 92.9° ± 3.7° (all p < 0.001). The osteoarthritis severity grade based on the KL scale was 2.4 ± 0.9 on standing AP radiography, 2.8 ± 0.9 on 45° PA flexion weight-bearing radiography (p = 0.003), and 3.4 ± 0.7 according to the modified Outerbridge classification. In the multivariate analyses, the KL grade on 45° PA flexion weight-bearing radiography (p = 0.01) and postoperative MPTA (p = 0.01) showed significant negative correlations with postoperative OKS at the 2-year follow-up.

Conclusion

The KL grading system based on 45° PA flexion weight-bearing radiography showed the strongest significant negative correlation with postoperative OKS after the OWHTO procedure using three different common OA classification schemes, which should be considered to determine the surgical indication of HTO. The KL grading system based on 45° PA flexion weight-bearing radiography showed the strongest correlation with high-tibial osteotomy-surgical indications and the counselling of patients with advanced osteoarthritis.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bonasia DE, Dettoni F, Sito G, Blonna D, Marmotti A, Bruzzone M, Castoldi F, Rossi R (2014) Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment overload/arthritis in the varus knee: prognostic factors. Am J Sports Med 42:690–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Floerkemeier S, Staubli AE, Schroeter S, Goldhahn S, Lobenhoffer P (2013) Outcome after high tibial open-wedge osteotomy: a retrospective evaluation of 533 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:170–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Friedman MJ, Brna JA, Gallick GS, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W, Snyder SJ, Ferkel RD, Moldawer TD (1987) Failed arthroscopic meniscectomy: prognostic factors for repeat arthroscopic examination. Arthroscopy 3:99–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shon OJ, Park SJ, Shim BJ, Lee DY (2017) Comparative study of clinical and radiographic outcomes of high tibial osteotomy in patients with kissing lesions and non-kissing lesions. Knee Surg Relat Res 29(4):288–294

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Curl WW, Krome J, Gordon ES, Rushing J, Smith BP, Poehling GG (1997) Cartilage injuries: a review of 31,516 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy 13:456–460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cubukcu D, Sarsan A, Alkan H (2012) Relationships between pain, function and radiographic findings in osteoarthritis of the knee: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis 2012:984060

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wright RW, Boyce RH, Michener T, Shyr Y, McCarty EC, Spindler KP (2006) Radiographs are not useful in detecting arthroscopically confirmed mild chondral damage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:245–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosenberg TD, Paulos LE, Parker RD, Coward DB, Scott SM (1988) The forty-five-degree posteroanterior flexion weight-bearing radiograph of the knee. J Bone Jt Surg Am 70:1479–1483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L (2001) Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty. Results of a survey of 3600 patients from The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Jt Surg Br 83:339–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. van Hove RP, Brohet RM, van Royen BJ, Nolte PA (2016) High correlation of the Oxford Knee Score with postoperative pain, but not with performance-based functioning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:3369–3375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Deshpande PR, Rajan S, Sudeepthi BL, Abdul Nazir CP (2011) Patient-reported outcomes: a new era in clinical research. Perspect Clin Res 2:137–144

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Loia MC, Vanni S, Rosso F, Bonasia DE, Bruzzone M, Dettoni F, Rossi R (2016) High tibial osteotomy in varus knees: indications and limits. Joints 4:98–110

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Haviv B, Bronak S, Thein R, Thein R (2013) The results of corrective osteotomy for valgus arthritic knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:49–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wright RW (2014) Osteoarthritis Classification Scales: interobserver reliability and arthroscopic correlation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96:1145–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nha KW, Lee YS, Hwang DH, Kwon JH, Chae DJ, Park YJ, Kim JI (2013) Second-look arthroscopic findings after open-wedge high tibia osteotomy focusing on the posterior root tears of the medial meniscus. Arthroscopy 29:226–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Han SB, Lee DH, Shetty GM, Chae DJ, Song JG, Nha KW (2013) A “safe zone” in medial open-wedge high tibia osteotomy to prevent lateral cortex fracture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:90–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chae DJ, Shetty GM, Lee DB, Choi HW, Han SB, Nha KW (2008) Tibial slope and patellar height after opening wedge high tibia osteotomy using autologous tricortical iliac bone graft. Knee 15:128–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoon SD, Zhang G, Kim HJ, Lee BJ, Kyung HS (2016) Comparison of cable method and Miniaci method using picture archiving and communication system in preoperative planning for open wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Relat Res 28:283–288

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Fujisawa Y, Masuhara K, Shiomi S (1979) The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee. An arthroscopic study of 54 knee joints. Orthop Clin N Am 10:585–608

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Petrie A (2006) Statistics in orthopaedic papers. J Bone Jt Surg Br 88:1121–1136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Andriacchi TP, Mundermann A (2006) The role of ambulatory mechanics in the initiation and progression of knee osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 18:514–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brouwer RW, Raaij van TM, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Verhagen AP, Jakma TS, Verhaar JA (2007) Osteotomy for treating knee osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Cd004019

  24. Miyazaki T, Wada M, Kawahara H, Sato M, Baba H, Shimada S (2002) Dynamic load at baseline can predict radiographic disease progression in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 61:617–622

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Spahn G, Kirschbaum S, Kahl E (2006) Factors that influence high tibial osteotomy results in patients with medial gonarthritis: a score to predict the results. Osteoarthr Cartil 14:190–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dahl WA, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM (2005) A 2-year prospective study of patient-relevant outcomes in patients operated on for knee osteoarthritis with tibial osteotomy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 6:18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Duncan ST, Khazzam MS, Burnham JM, Spindler KP, Dunn WR, Wright RW (2015) Sensitivity of standing radiographs to detect knee arthritis: a systematic review of level I studies. Arthroscopy 31:321–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sofat N, Ejindu V, Kiely P (2011) What makes osteoarthritis painful? The evidence for local and central pain processing. Rheumatology 50:2157–2165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Harris KK, Dawson J, Jones LD, Beard DJ, Price AJ (2013) Extending the use of PROMs in the NHS–using the Oxford Knee Score in patients undergoing non-operative management for knee osteoarthritis: a validation study. BMJ Open 3:e003365

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Farley FA, Weinstein SL (2006) The case for patient-centered care in orthopaedics. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14:447–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None of the authors received financial support for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. KWN and BHL participated in the study design and helped to draft the manuscript. SMO and YWH as a consultant for statistical analysis performed the statistical analysis. MKP conceived the study, and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. JHS participated in the interpretation of data for the work. All authors participated in (1) substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work, or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; (2) drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; (3) final approval of the version to be published; (4) agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byung Hoon Lee.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or the national research committee and in adherence with the Declaration of Helsinki adopted in 1964 and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nha, K.W., Oh, S.M., Ha, Y.W. et al. Radiological grading of osteoarthritis on Rosenberg view has a significant correlation with clinical outcomes after medial open-wedge high-tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27, 2021–2029 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5121-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5121-1

Keywords

Navigation