Skip to main content
Log in

Pudendal nerve injury is a relatively common but transient complication of hip arthroscopy

  • Hip
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Hip arthroscopy is emerging as the standard of care for conditions involving the hip, and has a unique set of complications. The purpose of this review was to identify (1) the crude rate of pudendal nerve injury following hip arthroscopy and (2) the specific factors leading to pudendal nerve injury.

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched from database inception to October 2016. Patient demographics, indications, surgical technique, complication rates, treatment approaches, and rehabilitation strategies were extracted.

Results

Twenty-four studies (n = 3405) were included, with the majority (66%) of studies being level IV evidence. The mean age was 33.9 ± 9.7 years (range 12–78) and 48.2% were males. Average follow-up was 30.2 ± 19.1 months. 62 patients were reported to have sustained pudendal nerve injury (1.8%) post-operatively, and all resolved within 6 weeks to 3 months. Of the seven studies that reported using a perineal post, 20 patients were diagnosed with pudendal nerve injury (4.3%), in contrast to two studies (189 patients) reporting only 0.5% pudendal nerve injury without the use of perineal post. Two studies commented on time of traction during surgical intervention with mean times of 98 and 68 min with complication rates of 10% and 6.6%, respectively.

Conclusions

Pudendal nerve injury is not uncommon following hip arthroscopy, with a reported rate found in this review of 1.8%. Potential risk factors may include the use of a perineal post and long traction times. All reported cases resolved within 3 months. Patients should be informed of complications related to pudendal nerve injury, which include sexual and urinary dysfunction.

Level of evidence

Level IV, systematic review of level I–IV studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brumback RJ, Ellison TS, Molligan H, Molligan DJ, Mahaffey S, Schmidhauser C (1992) Pudendal nerve palsy complicating intramedullary nailing of the femur. J Bone Jt Surg Am 74(10):1450–1455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brunner A, Horisberger M, Herzog R (2009) Evaluation of a computed tomography–based navigation system prototype for hip arthroscopy in the treatment of femoroacetabular cam impingement. Arthroscopy 25(4):382–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Byrd JWT, Jones KS, Gwathmey FW (2016) Arthroscopic management of femoracetabular impingement in adolescents. Arthroscopy 32(9):1800–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cvetanovich GL, Weber AE, Kuhns B, Hannon C, D’Souza D, Harris J, Mather R, Nho S (2016) Clinically meaningful improvements after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in adolescent and young adult patients regardless of gender. J Pediatr Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000852 (epub ahead of print)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dippmann C, Thorborg K, Kraemer O, Winge S, Halmich P (2014) Symptoms of nerve dysfunction after hip arthroscopy: an under-reported complication? Arthroscopy 30(2):202–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Domb BG, Redmond J, Dunne K, Stake C, Gupta A (2015) A matched-pair controlled study of microfracture of the hip with average 2-year follow-up: do full-thickness chondral defects portend an inferior prognosis in hip arthroscopy? Arthroscopy 31(4):628–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Domb BG, Gui C, Hutchinson MR, Nho SJ, Terry MA, Lodhia P (2016) Clinical outcomes of hip arthroscopy: a prospective survival analysis of primary and revision surgeries in a large mixed cohort. Am J Sports Med 44(10):2505–2517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dutton K, Kusenzov N, Lanzi J, Garcia E, Pallis M (2016) The success of hip arthroscopy in an active duty population. Arthroscopy 32(11):2251–2258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elsaidi GA, Ruch DS, Schaefer WD, Kuzma K, Smith BP (2004) Complications associated with traction on the hip during arthroscopy. J Bone Jt Surg Br 86:793–796

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Flierl MA, Stahel PF, Hak DJ, Morgan SJ, Smith WR (2010) Traction table-related complications in orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18(11):668–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. France MP, Aurori BF (1992) Pudendal nerve palsy following fracture table traction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 276:272–276

    Google Scholar 

  12. Funke EL, Munzinger U (1996) Complications in hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 12(2):156–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gedouin JE, May O, Bonin B, Nogier A, Boyer T, Sadri H, Villar RN, Laude F (2010) Assessment of arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement. A prospective multicenter study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96(8S):59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta A, Redmond JM, Stake CE, Dunne KF, Domb BG (2016) Does primary hip arthroscopy result in improved clinical outcomes?: 2-Year clinical follow-up on a mixed group of 738 consecutive primary hip arthroscopies performed at a high-volume referral center. Am J Sports Med 44(1):74–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gwathmey FW, Jones KS, Byrd JWT (2017) Revision hip arthroscopy: findings and outcomes. J Hip Preserv Surg. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnx014 (Epub ahead of print)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Horisberger M (2010) Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement of the hip: a new technique to access the joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(1):182–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kocher MS, Kim YJ, Millis MB, Mandiga R, Siparsky P, Michelo LJ, Kasser JR (2005) Hip arthroscopy in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 25(5):680–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Körsmeier K, Claßen T, Kamminga M, Rekowski J, Jäger M, Landgraeber S (2014) Arthroscopic three-dimensional autologous chondrocyte transplantation using spheroids for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the hip joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(6):2032–2037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee S, Frank RM, Harris K, Hoon Song S, Bush-Joseph CA, Salata MJ, Nho SJ (2015) Evaluation of sexual function before and after hip arthroscopic surgery for symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med 43(8):1850–1856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee YK, Ha YC, Hwang DS, Koo KH (2013) Learning curve of basic hip arthroscopy technique: CUSUM analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1940–1944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lo YP, Chan YS, Lien LC, Lee MS, Hsu KY, Shih CH (2006) Complications of hip arthroscopy: analysis of seventy-three cases. Chang Keng I Hsueh 29:86–92

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marchie A, Panuncialman I, McCarthy JC (2011) Efficacy of hip arthroscopy in the management of synovial chondromatosis. Am J Sports Med 39S:126S-131S

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mei-Dan O, McConkey MO, Young DA (2013) Hip arthroscopy distraction without the use of a perineal post: prospective study. Orthopedics 36(1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nepras P, Matejka J, Zeman P, Kudela J (2012) Arthroscopically-assisted procedures on the hip joint. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 79(2):135–139

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pailhé R, Chiron P, Reina N, Cavaignac E, Lafontan V, Laffosse JM (2013) Pudendal nerve neuralgia after hip arthroscopy: retrospective study and literature review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99(7):785–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Park MS, Yoon SJ, Kim YK, Chung WC (2014) Hip arthrscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: the changing nature and severity of associated complications over time. Arthroscopy 30(8):957–963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Papavasillou AV, Bardakos NV (2012) Complications of arthroscopic surgery of the hip. Bone Jt Res 1(7):131–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rhee SM, Kang SY, Jang EC, Kim JY, Ha YC (2016) Clinical outcomes after arthroscopic acetabular labral repair using knot tying or knotless suture techniques. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(10):1411–1416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sanchez Alvarez M (2001) Arthroscopic extirpation of an osteoid osteoma of the acetabulum. Arthroscopy 17(7):768–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sharfman ZT, Amar E, Tsvieli O, Alkrinawi N, Levy O, Rath E (2016) Complications of hip arthroscopy. Orthop Nurs 35(4):208–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sim Y, Horner N, de Sa D, Simunovic N, Karlsson J, Ayeni OR (2016) Reporting of non-hip score outcomes following femoroacetabular impingement surgery: a systematic review. J Hip Preserv Surg 2:224–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Telleria JJ, Safran MR, Harris AH, Gardi JN, Glick JM (2012) Risk of sciatic nerve traction injury during hip arthroscopy- is it the amount or duration? An intraoperative nerve monitoring study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 94(22):2025–2032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wylie JD, Beckmann JT, Maak TG, Aoki SWL (2015) Arthroscopic treatment of mild to moderate deformity after slipped capital femoral epiphysis: intra-operative findings and functional outcomes. Arthroscopy 31(2):247–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olufemi R. Ayeni.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Etienne Belzile has received institutional research Grants from Stryker, Zimmer-Biomet, Depuy-Synthes, ITO ltd, and Medtronic, and research grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Etienne Belzile is also an educational consultant for Stryker and Pendopharm. Both Olufemi Ayeni and Etienne Belzile are educational consultants for Smith and Nephew.

Funding

There is no funding source.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Habib, A., Haldane, C.E., Ekhtiari, S. et al. Pudendal nerve injury is a relatively common but transient complication of hip arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26, 969–975 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4783-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4783-4

Keywords

Navigation