Skip to main content
Log in

No beneficial effect of Polidocanol treatment in Achilles tendinopathy: a randomised controlled trial

  • Ankle
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Polidocanol injections have been used to treat chronic Achilles tendinopathy in clinical settings, but the few studies published show inconsistent results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term effect of Polidocanol in patients with chronic Achilles tendinopathy. It was hypothesised that patients treated with Polidocanol would have significant improvements in the outcome measures investigated compared to patients treated with a placebo treatment at mid-term follow-up.

Methods

This randomised controlled trial included forty-eight patients aged 32–77 years with a history of Achilles tendinopathy for at least 3 months and with neovascularisation demonstrated by ultrasonography was included. A minimum of 3 months of eccentric exercise treatment was required before participating. The patients were allocated to a maximum of two injection of either Polidocanol or Lidocaine (placebo). The primary outcome measure was pain during walking reported on a visual analogue scale. Secondary outcome measures were Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), patient satisfaction with treatment and, shortly after inclusion, the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles questionnaire (VISA-A) was also included. Follow-up examinations were performed after 3 and 6 months.

Results

Pain during walking decreased during the 6-month follow-up period, but no significant differences were seen between the two groups. The same tendency was seen for FAOS and VISA-A in which both groups showed an improvement at 3- and 6-month follow-up, but no mid-term differences between the groups were seen. An equal number of patients in the two groups were satisfied with the treatment at follow-up.

Conclusions

The results indicate that Polidocanol is a safe treatment, but the mid-term effects are the same as a placebo treatment. This further questions the use of Polidocanol in the treatment of chronic Achilles tendinopathy.

Level of evidence

I.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alfredson H, Ohberg L (2005) Sclerosing injections to areas of neo-vascularisation reduce pain in chronic Achilles tendinopathy: a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:338–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. de Jonge S, de Vos RJ, Weir A, van Schie HT, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Verhaar JA, Weinans H, Tol JL (2011) One-year follow-up of platelet-rich plasma treatment in chronic Achilles tendinopathy: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 39:1623–1629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. de Vos RJ, Weir A, van Schie HT, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Verhaar JA, Weinans H, Tol JL (2010) Platelet-rich plasma injection for chronic Achilles tendinopathy: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 303:144–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gross CE, Hsu AR, Chahal J, Holmes GB Jr (2013) Injectable treatments for noninsertional achilles tendinosis: a systematic review. Foot Ankle Int 34:619–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kingma JJ, de Knikker R, Wittink HM, Takken T (2007) Eccentric overload training in patients with chronic Achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 41:e3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lind B, Ohberg L, Alfredson H (2006) Sclerosing polidocanol injections in mid-portion Achilles tendinosis: remaining good clinical results and decreased tendon thickness at 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1327–1332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maffulli N, Papalia R, D’Adamio S, Diaz Balzani L, Denaro V (2015) Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of Achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br Med Bull 113:101–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maffulli N, Sharma P, Luscombe KL (2004) Achilles tendinopathy: aetiology and management. J R Soc Med 97:472–476

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Robinson JM, Cook JL, Purdam C, Visentini PJ, Ross J, Maffulli N, Taunton JE, Khan KM, Victorian Institute Of Sport Tendon Study Group (2001) The VISA-A questionnaire: a valid and reliable index of the clinical severity of Achilles tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med 35:335–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rompe JD, Furia J, Maffulli N (2009) Eccentric loading versus eccentric loading plus shock-wave treatment for midportion achilles tendinopathy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 37:463–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Roos EM, Engstrom M, Lagerquist A, Soderberg B (2004) Clinical improvement after 6 weeks of eccentric exercise in patients with mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy: a randomized trial with 1-year follow-up. Scand J Med Sci Sports 14:286–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sussmilch-Leitch SP, Collins NJ, Bialocerkowski AE, Warden SJ, Crossley KM (2012) Physical therapies for Achilles tendinopathy: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res 5:15

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. van Sterkenburg MN, de Jonge MC, Sierevelt IN, van Dijk CN (2010) Less promising results with sclerosing ethoxysclerol injections for midportion achilles tendinopathy: a retrospective study. Am J Sports Med 38:2226–2232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wijesekera NT, Chew NS, Lee JC, Mitchell AW, Calder JD, Healy JC (2010) Ultrasound-guided treatments for chronic Achilles tendinopathy: an update and current status. Skeletal Radiol 39:425–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Willberg L, Sunding K, Ohberg L, Forssblad M, Fahlstrom M, Alfredson H (2008) Sclerosing injections to treat midportion Achilles tendinosis: a randomised controlled study evaluating two different concentrations of Polidocanol. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:859–864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. M. Mølgaard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to this study.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from Hans og Nora Buchards Fond, Speciallæge Heinrich Kopps Legat and Region of Northern Denmark.

Ethical approval

The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the local ethical committee (VN-20060028) and the Danish Health and Medicines Authority (2006-002586-39), and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00377910).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ebbesen, B.H., Mølgaard, C.M., Olesen, J.L. et al. No beneficial effect of Polidocanol treatment in Achilles tendinopathy: a randomised controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26, 2038–2044 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4675-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4675-7

Keywords

Navigation