Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Education in wrist arthroscopy: past, present and future

  • Wrist
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Arthroscopy has assumed an important place in wrist surgery. It requires specific operative skills that are now mainly acquired in the operating room. In other fields of endoscopic surgery, e-learning and virtual reality (VR) have introduced new perspectives in teaching skills. This leads to the following research question: Could the current way of teaching wrist arthroscopy skills be supported using new educational media, such as e-learning and simulator training?

Method

The literature was searched for available methods of teaching endoscopic skills. Articles were assessed on the evidence of validity. In addition, a survey was sent to all members of the European Wrist Arthroscopy Society (EWAS) to find out whether hand surgeons express a need to embrace modern educational tools such as e-learning or simulators for training of wrist arthroscopy skills.

Results

This study shows that the current way of teaching wrist arthroscopy skills can be supported using new educational media, such as e-learning and simulator training. Literature indicates that e-learning can be a valuable tool for teaching basic knowledge of arthroscopy and supports the hypothesis that the use of virtual reality and simulators in training enhances operative skills in surgical trainees. This survey indicates that 55 out of 65 respondents feel that an e-learning program would be a valuable asset and 62 out of the 65 respondents are positive on the additional value of wrist arthroscopy simulator in training.

Conclusion

Study results support the need and relevance to strengthen current training of wrist arthroscopy using e-learning and simulator training.

Level of evidence

V.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bayona S, Fernandez-Arroyo JM, Martin I, Bayona P (2008) Assessment study of insight ARTHRO VR® arthroscopy virtual training simulator: face, content and construct validities. J Robot Surg 2:151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beux PL, Fieschi M (2007) Virtual biomedical universities and E-learning. Int J Med Inform 76:331–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhatti I, Jones K, Richardson L, Foreman D, Lund J, Tierney G (2011) E-learning vs lecture: which is the best approach to surgical teaching? Colorectal Dis 13:459–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bridges M, Diamond DL (1999) The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room. Am J Surg 177:28–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carroll C, Booth A, Papaioannou D, Sutton A, Wong R (2009) UK Health-care professionals’ experience of on-line learning techniques: a systematic review of qualitative data. J Cont Educ Health Prof 29:235–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Citak M, Calafi A, Kendoff D, Kupka T, Haasper C, Behrends M, Krettek C, Matthies HK, Hüfner T (2009) An internet based learning tool in orthopaedic surgery: preliminary experiences and results. Technol Health Care 17:141–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook DA, McDonald FS (2008) E-learning: is there anything special about the “E”? Perspect Biol Med 51:5–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM (2010) Instructional design variations in internet-based learning for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med 85:909–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Curry JI (2011) ‘See one, practise on a simulator, do one’: the mantra of the modern surgeon. S Afr J Surg 49:4–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Desai T, Christiano C, Ferris M (2011) Understanding the mobile internet to develop the next generation of online medical teaching tools. J Am Med Inform Assoc 18:875–878

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dunkin B, Adralas GL, Apelgren K, Mellinger JD (2007) Surgical stimulation: a current review. Surg Endosc 21:357–366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Farnworth LR, Lemay DE, Wooldridge T, Mabrey JD, Blaschak MJ, DeCoster TA, Wascher DC, Schenck RC (2001) A comparison of operative times in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction between orthopaedic faculty and residents: the financial impact of orthopaedic surgical training in the operating room. Iowa Orthop J 21:31–35

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaba DM (1992) Improving anesthesiologists’ performance by simulating reality. Anesthesiology 76:491–494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gallagher AG, McClure N, McGuigan J, Ritchie K, Sheehy NP (1998) An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy 30:617–620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, Higgins G, Fried MP, Moses G, Smith CD, Satava RM (2005) Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg 241:364–372

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gomoll AH, Pappas G, Forsythe B, Warner JJP (2008) Individual skill progression on a virtual reality simulator for shoulder arthroscopy: a 3-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 36:1139–1142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91:146–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grechenig W, Fellinger M, Fankhauser F, Weiglein AH (1999) The Graz learning and training model for arthroscopic surgery. Surg Radiol Anat 21:347–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gurusamy KS, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR (2008) Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 95:1088–1097

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Haque S, Srinivasan S (2006) A meta-analysis of the training effectiveness of virtual reality surgical simulators. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 10:51–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Harden RM (2006) Trends and the future of post-graduate medical education. Emerg Med J 23:789–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hart R, Karthigasu K (2007) The benefits of virtual reality simulator training for laparoscopic surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19:297–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Howells NR, Gill HS, Carr AJ, Price AJ, Rees JL (2008) Transferring simulated arthroscopic skills to the operating theatre: a randomised blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:494–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hugenholtz NIR, de Croon EM, Smits PB, van Dijk FJH, Nieuwenhuijsen K (2008) Effectiveness of e-learning in continuing medical education for occupational physicians. Occup Med 58:370–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hurmusiadis V, Rhode K, Schaeffter T, Sherman K (2011) Virtual trainer for minimally invasive surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform 163:236–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Khan MS, Ahmed K, Gavazzi A, Gohil R, Thomas L, Poulsen J, Ahmed M, Jaye P, Dasgupta P (2013) Development and implementation of centralized simulation training: evaluation of feasibility, acceptability and construct validity. BJU Int 111:518–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kneebone RL (1999) Twelve tips on teaching basic surgical skills using simulation and multimedia. Med Teach 21:571–575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Larvin M (2009) E-learning in surgical education and training. ANZ J Surg 79:133–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lau F, Bates J (2004) A review of e-learning practices for undergraduate medical education. J Med Syst 28:71–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Levinson AJ, Weaver B, Garside S, McGinn H, Norman GR (2007) Virtual reality and brain anatomy: a randomised trial of e-learning instructional designs. Med Educ 41:495–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mabrey JD, Gillogly SD, Kasser JR, Sweeney HJ, Zarins B, Mevis H, Garrett WE, Poss R, Cannon WD (2002) Virtual reality simulation of arthroscopy of the knee. Arthroscopy 18:E28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mabrey JD, Reinig KD, Cannon WD (2010) Virtual reality in orthopaedics: is it a reality? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2586–2591

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Marshall S www.elearningeuropa.info

  34. Martin KD, Belmont PJ, Schoenfeld AJ, Todd M, Cameron KL, Owens BD (2011) Arthroscopic basic task performance in shoulder simulator model correlates with similar task performance in cadavers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(21):e1271–e1275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Modi CS, Morris G, Mukherjee R (2010) Computer-simulation training for knee and shoulder arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy 26:832–840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Muller M, Duperret S, Viale J-P (2008) E-learning in medicine: appraisal and perspectives. Example of an educational website about echocardiography in anaesthesia, intensive care and emergencies: www.echorea.org. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 27:832–839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Palter VN, Grantcharov TP (2012) Development and validation of a comprehensive curriculum to teach an advanced minimally invasive procedure: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 256:25–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pedowitz RA, Esch J, Snyder S (2002) Evaluation of a virtual reality simulator for arthroscopy skills development. Arthroscopy 18:E29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Perkins GD, Fullerton JN, Davis-Gomez N, Davies RP, Baldock C, Stevens H, Bullock I (2010) The effect of pre-course e-learning prior to advanced life support training: a randomised controlled trial. Resuscitation 81:877–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Reime MH, Harris A, Aksnes J, Mikkelsen J (2008) The most successful method in teaching nursing students infection control: E-learning or lecture? Nurse Educ Today 28:798–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM (2006) The impact of E-learning in medical education. Acad Med 81:207–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rosen JM, Long SA, McGrath DM, Greer SE (2009) Simulation in plastic surgery training and education: the path forward. Plast Reconst Surg 123:729–738

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sadideen H, Hamaoui K, Saadeddin M, Kneebone R (2012) Simulators and the simulation environment: getting the balance right in simulation-based surgical education. Int J Surg 10:458–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sajeva M (2006) E-learning: web-based education. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 19:645–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ (2003) Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator. Surg Endosc 17:803–810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ, Broeders IAMJ, Tseng LNL (2005) The Eindhoven laparoscopic cholecystectomy training course–improving operating room performance using virtual reality training: results from the first E.A.E.S. accredited virtual reality trainings curriculum. Surg Endosc 19:1220–1226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Schreuder HWR, van Dongen KW, Roeleveld SJ, Schijven MP, Broeders IAMJ (2009) Face and construct validity of virtual reality simulation of laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(540):e1–e8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Seymour NE (2008) VR to OR: a review of the evidence that virtual reality simulation improves operating room performance. World J Surg 32:182–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, Obrien MK, Bansai VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236:458–464

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Stevens RJG (2011) Do trainees want e-learning in plastic surgery? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:e47–e49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Stevens RJG, Hamilton NM (2012) Is there a digital generation gap for e-learning in plastic surgery? J Surg Educ 69:344–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Tavakol M, Mohagheghi MA, Dennick R (2008) Assessing the skills of surgical residents using simulation. J Surg Educ 65:77–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Tuijthof GJM, van Sterkenburg MN, Sierevelt IN, van Oldenrijk J, van Dijk CN, Kerkhoffs GMMJ (2010) First validation of the PASSPORT training environment for arthroscopic skills. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:218–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Vlaovic PD, McDougall EM (2006) New age teaching: beyond didactics. ScientificWorldJournal 6:2370–2380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Verdaasdonk EGG, Stassen LPS, Schijven MP, Dankelman J (2007) Construct validity and assessment of the learning curve for the SIMENDO endoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc 21:1406–1412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. www.websurg.com

  57. Yaacoub F, Hamam Y, Abche A (2008) Computer-based training system for simulating wrist arthroscopy. In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE international symposium on computer-based medical systems, CBMS’08, pp 412–423

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    M. C. Obdeijn, N. Bavinck & C. M. A. M. van der Horst

  2. Institut de la Main, Clinique Jouvenet, Paris, France

    C. Mathoulin

  3. Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    M. P. Schijven

  4. Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    G. J. M. Tuijthof

  5. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    G. J. M. Tuijthof

Authors
  1. M. C. Obdeijn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Bavinck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Mathoulin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. M. A. M. van der Horst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. P. Schijven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. G. J. M. Tuijthof
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. C. Obdeijn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Obdeijn, M.C., Bavinck, N., Mathoulin, C. et al. Education in wrist arthroscopy: past, present and future. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23, 1337–1345 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2592-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2592-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation