Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Primary total knee arthroplasty using rotating-hinge prosthesis in severely affected knees

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

A rotating-hinge total knee prosthesis may be utilized for the treatment of global instability or severe bone loss around the knee. The outcome of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using Endo-Modell (Link®) rotating-hinge prosthesis was evaluated.

Methods

Retrospectively, review of 50 cases (40 patients) at a mean follow-up of 15 years (range, 10–18) who underwent primary TKA using Endo-Modell (Link®) was performed. Indications included severe primary osteoarthritis with substantial ligament laxity, severe rheumatic arthritis with extreme ligament instability and bone loss, supracondylar nonunion, charcot arthropathy, and posttraumatic arthritis. Knee Society Score (KSS) and radiographic analysis were done for preoperative and at latest follow-up. Statistical analysis was done using the Student’s t test with the level of significance of p < 0.05.

Results

Overall, the rotating-hinge arthroplasty resulted in improved knee functioning. The KSS improved (p < 0.001) from a preoperative mean of 38 ± 14.3 (SD) points to a postoperative mean of 73 ± 12.8 points; the functional score improved (n.s.) from 36 ± 19.5 points to 47 ± 23.5 points. Mean range of motion at the most recent clinical follow-up evaluation was 102 ± 9°. However, all (100%) patients needed some form of assisted devices for walking and a relatively large number of deep infections (14%) were encountered.

Conclusions

Reconstruction with a rotating-hinge total knee prosthesis provided substantial improvement in function and reduction in pain. However, the possibility of assisted walking and high rate of deep infection should be encountered.

Level of evidence

Retrospective therapeutic study, Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrack RL (2001) Evolution of the rotating hinge for complex total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:292–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrack RL, Lyons TR, Ingraham RQ, Johnson JC (2000) The use of a modular rotating hinge component in salvage revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15:858–866

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bohm P, Holy T (1998) Is there a future for hinged prostheses in primary total knee arthroplasty? A 20-year survivorship analysis of the Blauth prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:302–309

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Davila J, Malkani A, Paiso JM (2001) Supracondylar distal femoral nonunions treated with a megaprosthesis in elderly patients: a report of two cases. J Orthop Trauma 15:574–578

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Deehan DJ, Murray J, Birdsall PD, Holland JP, Pinder IM (2008) The role of the rotating hinge prosthesis in the salvage arthroplasty setting. J Arthroplasty 23:683–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Draganich LF, Whitehurst JB, Chou LS, Piotrowski GA, Pottenger LA, Finn HA (1999) The effects of the rotating-hinge total knee replacement on gait and stair stepping. J Arthroplasty 14:743–755

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ewald FC (1989) The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fuchs S, Sandmann C, Gerdemann G, Skwara A, Tibesku CO, Bottner F (2004) Quality of life and clinical outcome in salvage revision total knee replacement: hinged vs total condylar design. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12:140–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guenoun B, Latargez L, Freslon M, Defossez G, Salas N, Gayet LE (2009) Complications following rotating hinge Endo-Modell (Link) knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:529–536

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gustke KA (2005) Preoperative planning for revision total knee arthroplasty: avoiding chaos. J Arthroplasty 20:37–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hernandez-Vaquero D, Sandoval-Garcia MA (2010) Hinged total knee arthroplasty in the presence of ligamentous deficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:1248–1253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Inglis AE, Walker PS (1991) Revision of failed knee replacements using fixed-axis hinges. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:757–761

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Joshi N, Navarro-Quilis A (2008) Is there a place for rotating-hinge arthroplasty in knee revision surgery for aseptic loosening? J Arthroplasty 23:1204–1211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaplan E, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Keenan J, Chakrabarty G, Newman JH (2000) Treatment of supracondylar femoral fracture above total knee replacement by custom made hinged prosthesis. Knee 7:165–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lachiewicz PF, Falatyn SP (1996) Clinical and radiographic results of the total condylar III and constrained condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11:916–922

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Laurin CA, Dussault R, Levesque HP (1979) The tangential x-ray investigation of the patellofemoral joint: x-ray technique, diagnostic criteria and their interpretation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 144:16–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Merchant AC, Mercer RL, Jacobsen RH, Cool CR (1974) Roentgenographic analysis of patellofemoral congruence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:1391–1396

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nieder E (1991) Sled prosthesis, rotating knee and hinge prosthesis: St. Georg model and ENDO-model. Differential therapy in primary knee joint arthroplasty. Orthopade 20:170–180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Petrou G, Petrou H, Tilkeridis C, Stavrakis T, Kapetsis T, Kremmidas N, Gavras M (2004) Medium-term results with a primary cemented rotating-hinge total knee replacement. A 7- to 15-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:813–817

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pour AE, Parvizi J, Slenker N, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF (2007) Rotating hinged total knee replacement: use with caution. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1735–1741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pradhan NR, Bale L, Kay P, Porter ML (2004) Salvage revision total knee replacement using the Endo-Model rotating hinge prosthesis. Knee 11:469–473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rand JA, Chao EY, Stauffer RN (1987) Kinematic rotating-hinge total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:489–497

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rand JA, Ilstrup DM (1991) Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty. Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:397–409

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Scuderi GR (2001) Revision total knee arthroplasty: how much constraint is enough? Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:300–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sculco TP (2006) The role of constraint in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:54–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shaw JA, Balcom W, Greer RB 3rd (1989) Total knee arthroplasty using the kinematic rotating hinge prosthesis. Orthopedics 12:647–654

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Springer BD, Hanssen AD, Sim FH, Lewallen DG (2001) The kinematic rotating hinge prosthesis for complex knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:283–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Springer BD, Sim FH, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG (2004) The modular segmental kinematic rotating hinge for nonneoplastic limb salvage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 421:181–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Utting MR, Newman JH (2004) Customised hinged knee replacements as a salvage procedure for failed total knee arthroplasty. Knee 11:475–479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vince KG (2003) Why knees fail. J Arthroplasty 18:39–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Walker PS, Emerson R, Potter T, Scott R, Thomas WH, Turner RH (1982) The kinematic rotating hinge: biomechanics and clinical application. Orthop Clin North Am 13:187–199

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang CJ, Wang HE (2000) Early catastrophic failure of rotating hinge total knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 15:387–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Westrich GH, Mollano AV, Sculco TP, Buly RL, Laskin RS, Windsor R (2000) Rotating hinge total knee arthroplasty in severely affected knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 379:195–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Ms. Min-Jung Lee for her assistance with the analysis and statistical assessment of the data. Authors also thank Ms. Hyeran Lee for her assistance with this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taik-Sun Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, JH., Yoon, JR., Oh, CH. et al. Primary total knee arthroplasty using rotating-hinge prosthesis in severely affected knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20, 517–523 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1590-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1590-1

Keywords

Navigation