Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relationship between the surgical epicondylar axis and the articular surface of the distal femur: an anatomic study

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Many authors presented the epicondylar axis as the fixed axis of rotation of the femoral condyles during flexion of the knee. Positioning of the femoral component of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) based on the epicondyles has been proposed. This work is a critical analysis of this concept. Metallic bodies were inserted at the level of collateral ligament insertions on 16 dried femurs, allowing us to locate the surgical epicondylar axis. The dried femurs were studied using standard radiographs and CT-scan. CT cuts were made perpendicular to the epicondylar axis. The medial mechanical femoral angle and the epicondylar angle were measured on the radiographs. The posterior and distal epiphyseal rotations relative to the epicondylar axis (Posterior Condylar Angle, PCA, and Distal Condylar Angle, DCA, respectively) were measured on the CT-scans. PCA and DCA values were compared. The centre of the posterior femoral condyles was located on sagittal reconstructions using the tangent method and was confirmed with circular templates, and then compared to the location of the epicondyles. Circle-fitting of the entire femoral condylar contours centred on the epicondyles was also tried. The mechanical femoral axis was nearly perpendicular to the epicondylar axis but with important variations. The average PCA and DCA were 1.9° ± 1.8° and 3.1° ± 2.1°, respectively. No relationship could be established between the mechanical femoral angle and the PCA. The individual differences between the PCA and the DCA averaged 2.2°. A significant distance was found between the centre of the condylar contours and the epicondyles: 6.5 mm in average on the lateral side (range 2.3–11.3 mm) and 8.4 mm on the medial side (range 4.0–11.6 mm). Circle-fitting of the entire medial or lateral femoral condylar contours centred on the epicondyles was not possible. The centre of the posterior femoral condyles is significantly different from the epicondylar axis, thus refuting the conclusions of previous authors. Furthermore, considering the differences between the distal and posterior condylar angles shown here, as well as the difficulty of repeatably locating the epicondyles during surgery, using the epicondylar axis as the only landmark to position the femoral component during a first intention TKA is not recommended. The surgical epicondylar axis does not appear to be an adequate basis for the understanding of the shape of the distal femur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akagi M, Yamashita E, Nakagawa T, Asano T, Nakamura T (2001) Relationship between frontal knee alignment and reference axes in the distal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 147–156

  2. Arima J, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS, White SE (1995) Femoral rotational alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee. A technical note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1331–1334

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Asano T, Akagi M, Nakamura T (2005) The functional flexion-extension axis of the knee corresponds to the surgical epicondylar axis: in vivo analysis using a biplanar image-matching technique. J Arthroplasty 20:1060–1067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Asano T, Akagi M, Tanaka K, Tamura J, Nakamura T (2001) In vivo three-dimensional knee kinematics using a biplanar image-matching technique. Clin Orthop 388:157–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS (1993) Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop 40-47

  6. Blaha JD, Mancinelli CA, Simons WH (2002) Using the transepicondylar axis to define the sagittal morphology of the distal part of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A Suppl 2:48–55

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blaha JD, Mancinelli CA, Simons WH, Kish VL, Thyagarajan G (2003) Kinematics of the human knee using an open chain cadaver model. Clin Orthop Relat Res 25–34

  8. Blankevoort L, Huiskes R, de Lange A (1990) Helical axes of passive knee joint motions. J Biomech 23:1219–1229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Boisgard S, Moreau PE, Descamps S, Courtalhiac C, Silbert H, Moreel P, Michel JL, Levai JP (2003) Computed tomographic study of the posterior condylar angle in arthritic knees: its use in the rotational positioning of the femoral implant of total knee prostheses. Surg Radiol Anat 25:330–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD (1998) The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop 111–118

  11. Desme D, Galand-Desme S, Besse JL, Henner J, Moyen B, Lerat JL (2006) Axial lower limb alignment and knee geometry in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 92:673–679

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Eckhoff DG, Bach JM, Spitzer VM, Reinig KD, Bagur MM, Baldini TH, Rubinstein D, Humphries S (2003) Three-dimensional morphology and kinematics of the distal part of the femur viewed in virtual reality. Part II. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A Suppl 4:97–104

    Google Scholar 

  13. Elias SG, Freeman MA, Gokcay EI (1990) A correlative study of the geometry and anatomy of the distal femur. Clin Orthop 98–103

  14. Freeman MA, Pinskerova V (2003) The movement of the knee studied by magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop 35–43

  15. Griffin FM, Insall JN, Scuderi GR (1998) The posterior condylar angle in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty 13:812–815

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Griffin FM, Math K, Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Poilvache PL (2000) Anatomy of the epicondyles of the distal femur: MRI analysis of normal knees. J Arthroplasty 15:354–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hollister AM, Jatana S, Singh AK, Sullivan WW, Lupichuk AG (1993) The axes of rotation of the knee. Clin Orthop 259–268

  18. Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MA (2000) Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:1189–1195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang CC, Insall JN (1989) Effect of rotation on the axial alignment of the femur. Pitfalls in the use of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 50–56

  20. Jonsson H, Karrholm J (1994) Three-dimensional knee joint movements during a step-up: evaluation after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. J Orthop Res 12:769–779

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Katz MA, Beck TD, Silber JS, Seldes RM, Lotke PA (2001) Determining femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: reliability of techniques. J Arthroplasty 16:301–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kinzel V, Ledger M, Shakespeare D (2005) Can the epicondylar axis be defined accurately in total knee arthroplasty? Knee 12:293–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kurosawa H, Walker PS, Abe S, Garg A, Hunter T (1985) Geometry and motion of the knee for implant and orthotic design. J Biomech 18:487–499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Laskin RS (1995) Flexion space configuration in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10:657–660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mantas JP, Bloebaum RD, Skedros JG, Hofmann AA (1992) Implications of reference axes used for rotational alignment of the femoral component in primary and revision knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 7:531–535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Urabe K, Mawatari T, Iwamoto Y (2003) A comparison of rotational landmarks in the distal femur and the tibial shaft. Clin Orthop Relat Res 183–188

  27. Miller MC, Berger RA, Petrella AJ, Karmas A, Rubash HE (2001) Optimizing femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 38–45

  28. Nagamine R, Miura H, Inoue Y, Urabe K, Matsuda S, Okamoto Y, Nishizawa M, Iwamoto Y (1998) Reliability of the anteroposterior axis and the posterior condylar axis for determining rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 3:194–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE (1996) Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 35–46

  30. Scott WN (2006) Insall & Scott Surgery of the Knee, 4th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shiavi R, Limbird T, Frazer M, Stivers K, Strauss A, Abramovitz J (1987) Helical motion analysis of the knee-II. Kinematics of uninjured and injured knees during walking and pivoting. J Biomech 20:653–665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Stiehl JB, Abbott BD (1995) Morphology of the transepicondylar axis and its application in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10:785–789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Stoeckl B, Nogler M, Krismer M, Beimel C, de la Barrera JL, Kessler O (2006) Reliability of the transepicondylar axis as an anatomical landmark in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:878–882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yercan HS, Ait Si Selmi T, Sugun TS, Neyret P (2005) Tibiofemoral instability in primary total knee replacement: A review Part 2: diagnosis, patient evaluation, and treatment. Knee 12:336–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yercan HS, Ait Si Selmi T, Sugun TS, Neyret P (2005) Tibiofemoral instability in primary total knee replacement: a review, Part 1: Basic principles and classification. Knee 12:257–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yoshino N, Takai S, Ohtsuki Y, Hirasawa Y (2001) Computed tomography measurement of the surgical and clinical transepicondylar axis of the distal femur in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty 16:493–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Yoshioka Y, Siu D, Cooke TD (1987) The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:873–880

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Frédéric Lavoie would like to thank the Société Française de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique (SOFCOT) for their financial support during his fellowship year in France.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Centre Livet, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, 8, rue de Margnolles, 69300, Caluire, Lyon, France

    Sébastien Lustig, Tarik Ait Si Selmi, Elvire Servien & Philippe Neyret

  2. Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada

    Frédéric Lavoie

Authors
  1. Sébastien Lustig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frédéric Lavoie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tarik Ait Si Selmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elvire Servien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Philippe Neyret
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sébastien Lustig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lustig, S., Lavoie, F., Selmi, T.A.S. et al. Relationship between the surgical epicondylar axis and the articular surface of the distal femur: an anatomic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthr 16, 674–682 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0551-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0551-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation