Abstract
The reconstruction of a tendon–bone interface, as in rotator-cuff repairs, remains a challenging surgical problem. There is however, little data to show what effect joint position or repair loading under physiological conditions have on the repaired tendon–bone interface. A change in the amount of contact area or load at the tendon–bone interface may influence healing. In this study we investigated the effect of limb position and boundary conditions on the tendon–bone interface in an in vitro rabbit tendon–bone repair model using both unlinked and linked suture repairs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakalim G, Pasila M (1975) Surgical treatment of rupture of the rotator cuff tendon. Acta Orthop Scand 46:751–757
Bateman JE (1963) The diagnosis and treatment of ruptures of the rotator cuff. Surg Clin North Am 43:1523–1530
Gerber C, Schneeberger AG, Beck M, Schlegel U (1994) Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:371–380
Hawkins RJ, Misamore GW, Hobeika PE (1985) Surgery for full-thickness rotator-cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:1349–1355
Heikel HV (1968) Rupture of the rotator cuff of the shoulder: Experiences of surgical treatment. Acta Orthop Scand 39:477–492
Itoi E, Sashi R, Minagawa H, Shimizu T, Wakabayashi I, Sato K (2001) Position of immobilization after dislocation of the glenohumeral joint. A study with use of magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:661–667
McLaughlin HL (1963) Repair of the rotator cuff. Surg Clin North Am 43:1535–1540
Nixon JE, DiStefano V (1975) Ruptures of the rotator cuff. Orthop Clin North Am 6:423–447
Zuckerman JD, Leblanc JM, Choueka J, Kummer F (1991) The effect of arm position and capsular release on rotator cuff repair. A biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:402–405
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hughes, P.J., Evans, R.O.N., Miller, B. et al. Boundary conditions at the tendon–bone interface. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13, 55–59 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-003-0461-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-003-0461-9