Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A proposal for a structured approach for cross-company teamwork: a case study of involving the customer in service innovation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Research in Engineering Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper outlines the results of a project aiming to develop and apply methods for service co-creation with customers, focusing on the early phases of service development. The project is collaboration between a manufacturing firm in the automotive industry, one of their B2B-customers (a transportation firm), as well as a university, all in Sweden. The research team selected and developed methods and work practices for problem analysis, idea generation, development and evaluation of services. Thus doing, methodological influence was taken from the area of engineering design. The proposed approaches were applied in a service development experiment mainly based on workshops. The experiment was followed up by an analysis of the resulting output, an interview series, and an evaluation by peers in focus groups. The goal of this article is to answer the following research questions: (1) What is the industrial applicability of co-creating services using a structured approach, e.g. what are the benefits and challenges? (2) What do the different actors contribute with using this approach, and what possible factors influence the nature and quality of the actors’ contributions? (3) Based on the answers to the questions above, what aspects should be considered to support situated planning and execution of future service co-creation projects? A central conclusion is that a structured approach is industrially applicable, but it is also evident that there is no completely universal recipe for service innovation. Addressing these insights, the paper also contributes with guidelines to support the situation-adapted set-up of future service co-creation projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almefelt L (2005) Requirements-driven product innovation—methods and tools reflecting industrial needs. Ph.D. Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden

  • Almefelt L, Berglund F, Nilsson P, Malmqvist J (2006) Requirements management in practice: findings from an empirical study in the automotive industry. Res Eng Design 17(3):113–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almefelt L, Rexfelt O, Zackrisson D and Hallman T (2009) Methodology for service innovation in a Multi-Disciplinary context. In: Proceedings of ICED’09, pp 5–405

  • ALMEGA (The Swedish organisation of service companies) (2008) Innovativa tjänsteföretag och forskarsamhället

  • Alonso-Rasgado T, Thompson G, Dannemark OJ (2004) State of the art in service design & modelling. Vivace Project, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM (1998) How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review 76(5):76–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Araujo CS (2001) Acquisition of product development tools in industry: a theoretical contribution. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark

  • Bateson J (1977) Do we need service marketing? Marketing consumer services: new insights, report 75–115. Marketing Science Institute, Boston

  • Bitran G, Pedrosa L (1998) A structured product development perspective for service operations. European Management Journal 16(2):169–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braha D, Reich Y (2003) Topological structures for modelling engineering design processes. Res Eng Design 14(4):185–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown S (2000) The move to solutions providers. Market Manag 9(1):10

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger HJ, Fähnrich KP, Meiren T (2003) Service engineering—methodical development of new service products. International Journal of Production Economics 85:275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chia MC, Chin TC, Chin HH (2002) A review of service quality in corporate and recreational sport/fitness programs. The Sport Journal 5(3):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark G, Johnston R, Shulver M (2000) Exploiting the service concept for service design and development. In: Fitzsimmons J, Fitzsimmons M (eds) New service design. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt G, Smolkov M (2006) Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance. Des Stud 27(5):549–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos C (2007) Service management and marketing—customer management in service competition, 3rd edn. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1989) Fourth generation evaluation. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel A, Weil B (2003) A new approach of innovative design: an introduction to C-K theory. In: Proceedings of ICED’03. Stockholm, Sweden, pp 109–124

  • Isaksson O, Larsson TC, Rönnbäck Öhrwall A (2009) Development of product-service systems: challenges and opportunities for the manufacturing firm. J Eng Des 20(4):329–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen TE, Andreasen MM (2010) Design methods in practice—beyond the “Systematic Approach” of Pahl & Beitz. In: Proceedings design 2010. Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp 21–28

  • Johne A, Storey C (1998) New service development: a review of the literature and annotated bibliography. Eur J Mark 32(3/4):184–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legardeur J, Boujut JF, Tiger H (2010) Lessons Learned from an empirical study of the early phases of an unfulfilled innovation. Res Eng Design (online first, 8 April 2010)

  • López-Mesa B, Thompson G (2006) On the significance of cognitive style and the selection of appropriate design methods. J Eng Des 17(4):371–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Mesa B, Mulet E, Vidal R, Thompson G (2009) Effects of additional stimuli on idea-finding in design teams. J Eng Design (iFirst, 29 June 2009)

  • Lovelock C, Gummesson E (2004) Whither services marketing? In search of a new paradigm and fresh perspectives. Journal of Service Marketing 7(1):20–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Luecke R, Katz R (2003) Managing creativity and innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthing J, Sandén B, Edvardsson B (2004) New service development learning from and with customers. International Journal of Service Industry Management 15(5):479–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier H, Roy R, Seliger G (2008) Industrial product-service systems—IPS2. CIRP Ann Manufact Technol 59(2):607–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Menor L, Tatikonda M, Sampson S (2002) New service development: areas for exploitation and exploration. J Oper Manag 20(2):135–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz S (2005) Service design: practical access to an evolving field. Köln International School of Design, Cologne

  • Norell M (1992) Stödmetoder och samverkan i produktutveckling (Advisory tools and co-operation in product development). Ph.D. Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

  • Ottosson S (1996) Dynamic product development: findings from participating action research in a fast new product development process. J Eng Des 7(2):151–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering design, a systematic approach, 2nd English edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1985) A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Retailing 49:41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh S (1991) Total design: integrated methods for successful product engineering. Addison-Wesley, New York

  • Reich Y, Konda SL, Monarch IA, Levy SN, Subrahmanian E (1996) Varieties and issues of participation and design. Des Stud 17:165–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich Y, Ullmann G, Van der Loos M, Leifer L (2009) Coaching product development teams: a conceptual foundation for empirical studies. Res Eng Design 19:205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rexfelt O (2008) User-centred design and technology-mediated services-identifying and addressing challenges by analysing activities. Ph.D. Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden

  • Sarkar P, Chakrabarti A (2008) The effect of representation of triggers on design outcomes. Artif Intell Eng Design Anal Manufact 22(2):101–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter J (1934) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Segers NM, de Vries B, Achten HH (2005) Do word graphs stimulate design? Des Stud 26(6):625–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Spat D, Fähnrich KP (2008) Advances in services innovations. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh NP (1990) The principles of design. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Svensson L, Brulin G, Ellström PE, Widegren Ö (2002) Interaktiv forskning—för utveckling av teori och praktik (Interactive research—for development of theory and practice). Arbetslivsinstitutet, Stockholm in Swedish

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjalve E (1979) A short course on industrial design. Newnes-Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing 68(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veeke H, Lodewijks G, Ottjes J (2006) Conceptual design of industrial systems: an approach to support collaboration. Res Eng Design 17(2):85–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal R, Mulet E, Gómez-Senent E (2004) Effectiveness of the means of expression in creative problem-solving in design groups. J Eng Des 3(3):285–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin R (1994) Case study research: design and methods. Sage Publishing, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky F (1971) Entdecken, Erfinden, Forschen im Morphologischen Weltbild. Droemer-Knaur, München

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our thanks to all team members for making the workshops and interviews reality. In addition, the financial support from Vinnova, the Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems, is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Product and Production Development, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Oskar Rexfelt, Lars Almefelt, Johan Malmqvist & MariAnne Karlsson

  2. Volvo Technology Corporation, Gropegårdsgatan 10, M1:6, 40508, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Daniel Zackrisson & Teres Hallman

Authors
  1. Oskar Rexfelt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lars Almefelt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel Zackrisson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Teres Hallman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Johan Malmqvist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. MariAnne Karlsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oskar Rexfelt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rexfelt, O., Almefelt, L., Zackrisson, D. et al. A proposal for a structured approach for cross-company teamwork: a case study of involving the customer in service innovation. Res Eng Design 22, 153–171 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-011-0104-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-011-0104-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation