Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrodynamic design using a derivative-free method

  • Industrial applications
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A derivative-free shape optimization tool for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is developed in order to facilitate the implementation of complex flow solvers in the design procedure. A modified Rosenbrock’s method is used, which needs neither gradient evaluations nor approximations. This approach yields a robust and flexible tool and gives the capability of performing optimizations involving complex configurations and phenomena. The flow solver implemented solves the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations (RANSE) on unstructured grids, using near-wall, low-Reynolds-number turbulence models. Free surface effects are taken into account by a pseudosteady surface tracking method. A mesh deformation strategy based on both lineal and torsional springs analogies is used to update the mesh while maintaining the quality of the grid near the wall for two-dimensional problems. A free-form-deformation technique is used to manage the mesh and the shape perturbations for three-dimensional cases. Two hydrodynamic applications are presented, concerning first the design of a two-dimensional hydrofoil in relation with the free-surface elevation and then the three-dimensional optimization of a hull shape, at full scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, W.K.; Bonhaus, D.L. 1997: Aerodynamic design on unstructured grids for turbulent flows. NASA Technical Memorandum 112867

  2. Anderson, W.K.; Nielsen, E. 1999: Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured meshes using the Navier–Stokes equations. AIAA J.37, 1411–1419

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, W.K.; Venkatakrishnan, V. 1999: Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured grids with a continuous adjoint formulation. Comput. Fluids28, 443–480

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, P.; Huang, C. 2002: An inverse hull design problem in optimizing the desired wake of a ship. J. Ship Res.46, 138–147

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deng, G.; Guilmineau, E.; Queutey, P.; Visonneau, M. 2001: Capture et suivi d’interfaces d’ecoulements de fluides visqueux incompressibles non miscibles. 8e Journées de l’Hydrodynamique, Ecole Centrale de Nantes

  6. Deng, G.; Visonneau, M. 1999: Comparison of explicit algebraic stress models and second-order turbulence closures for steady flows around ships. In: Proc. of the Seventh International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics. Ecole Centrale de Nantes, Nantes, France

  7. Deng, G.; Visonneau, M. 2000: Comparison of explicit algebraic stress models and second-order turbulence closures for steady flows around the kvlcc2 ship at model and full scales. In: A Workshop on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg

  8. Duncan, J. 1983: The breaking and non-breaking wave resistance of a two-dimensional hydrofoil. J. Fluid Mech.126

  9. Elliott, J.; Peraire, J. 1996: Practical 3d aerodynamic design and optimization using unstructured grids. AIAA J.35, 1479–1485

    Google Scholar 

  10. Farhat, C.; Degand, C.; Koobus, B.; Lesoinne, M. 1998: Torsional springs for two dimensional dynamic unstructured fluid meshes. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 231–245

  11. Gill, P.E.; Murray, W.; Wright, M.H. 1981: Practical Optimization. Academic

  12. Hino, T. 1999: Shape optimization of practical ship hull forms using Navier–Stokes analysis. In: Proc. of the 7th International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics. Ecole Centrale de Nantes

  13. Hovland, P.; Mohammadi, B.; Bischof, C. 1997: Automatic differentiation and Navier–Stokes computation. Technical Report ANL/MCS P687-0997, Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argone National Laboratory

  14. Jameson, A. 1988: Aerodynamic design via control theory. J. Sci. Comput.97, 233-260

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jameson, A.; Martinelli, L.; Pierce, N.A. 1998: Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier–Stokes equations. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dynamics10, 213–237

    Google Scholar 

  16. Larsson, L.; Stern, F.; Bertram, V. 2000: Summary, conclusions and recommendations of the Gothenburg 2000 Workshop. In: A Workshop on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg

  17. Lewis, R.; Torczon, V.; Trosset, M. 2000: Direct search methods: then and now. ICASE Rep.

  18. Madsen, J. 2000: Response surface techniques for diffuser shape optimization. AIAA J.38, 1512–1518

    Google Scholar 

  19. Maute, K.; Nikbay, M.; Farhat, C. 2001: Coupled analytical sensitivity analysis and optimization of three-dimensional non-linear aeroelastic systems. AIAA J.39, 2051–2061

    Google Scholar 

  20. Menter, F. 1993: Zonal two-equations k-ω turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. AIAA paper 93-2906

  21. Muzaferija, S.; Peric, M. 1998: Computation of free surface flows using interface-tracking and interface-capturing methods. Non linear Wave Interaction. Computational mechanics computations

  22. Mason, W.; Watson, L. 1994: Noisy aerodynamic response and smooth approximations in HSCT design. AIAA paper 94-4316

  23. Rhie, C.L.; Chow, W.L. 1982: A numerical study of the turbulent flow on an isolated airfoil with trailing edge separation. AIAA paper 82-0998, AIAA/ASME 3rd Joint Thermophysics Fluids, Plasma and Heat Transfer Conference

  24. Rosenbrock, H.H. 1960: An automatic method for finding the greatest or least value of a function. Comp. J.3, 175–184

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sederberg, T.; Parry, S. 1986: Free-from deformation of solid geometric models. Comput. Graph.20, 151–160

    Google Scholar 

  26. Spalart, P.R.; Allmaras, S.R. 1991: A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Paper 92-0439

  27. Swann, W.H. 1964: Report on the development of a new direct search method of optimization. Technical Report Research Note 64/3, ICI Central Instrument Laboratory

  28. Van, S.; Kim, W.; Yim, D.; Lee, C.; Eom, J. 1998: Flow measurement around a 300KVLCC model. In: Proc. of the Annual Spring Meeting, SNAK. Ulsan

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Visonneau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duvigneau, R., Visonneau, M. Hydrodynamic design using a derivative-free method. Struct Multidisc Optim 28, 195–205 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0414-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0414-z

Keywords

Navigation