Abstract
The contribution by Hubert L. Dreyfus to the debate on the feasibility of AI projects has been surely of great relevance because of his pointing out specific limits of the machine as compared to the human mind. His critics, along with the actual difficulties encountered in the advance of a pure symbolic AI, induced a wide discussion that in some measure stimulated other ways to follow for reproducing human abilities. Nevertheless, a curious fact characterizes the history of AI regarding the problems raised, among the many, by Dreyfus. While in the first era the main concern by the opponents was to certify the limited power of computers as compared to humans, it seems that today the main concern is exactly the opposite, namely the growing and threatening power of AI devices, both software and hardware based, such as robots. Maybe the reason of that has been, and is today too, the imbalance assigned to the discussion, on the one side, of what human faculties are and work, and, on the other, on what the artificial is and can work. Designing the artificial, in every field, means to give birth to devices that consist of a sort of overlapping of nature and technology, and, therefore, they deserve to be named naturoids. This implies that, to understand them, we need to study their genuine ‘artificial nature’ in general terms, bringing further what H. A. Simon called the ‘science of the artificial’.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Drew McDermott M, Mitchell Waldrop R, Schank B, Chandrasekaran J, McDermott (1985) The dark ages of AI: a panel discussion at AAAI 84. AI Mag 6:3
Dreyfus HL (1992) What computers still can’t do. A critique of artificial reason, New York
Dreyfus SE, Dreyfus HL (1980) A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition (PDF). Storming Media, Washington, DC. Retrieved 13 June 2010
Geminboek P, Saunders R (2016) Towards socializing non-anthropomorphic robots by harnessing dancers’ kinesthetic awareness. In: Koh JTKV, Dunstan BJ, Silvera-Tawil D, Velonaki M (eds) Cultural robotics: first international workshop. IEEE RO-MAN. Springer, Switzerland
Hoffman G, Weinberg G (2010) Synchronization in human–robot musicianship. In: The 19th international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, Viareggio
Murano P (2002) Anthropomorphic vs non-anthropomorphic software interface feedback for online systems usage. In: 7th European Research Consortium for Informatics
Negrotti M (2010) Naturoids: from a dream to a paradox. Futures Elsevier 42:759–768
Negrotti M (2012) The reality of the artificial, nature, technology and naturoids. Springer, Heidelberg
Rosen R (1993) Bionics revisited. In: Karlqvist A, Svedin U, Haken H (eds) The machine as metaphor and tool. Springer, New York
Searle JR (1980) Minds, brains, and programs. Behav Brain Sci 3(3):417–457
Sivakumar PK, Srinivas CS, Kiselev A, Loutfi A (2013) Robot–human hand-overs in non-anthropomorphic robots. In: 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Negrotti, M. Hubert Dreyfus, the artificial and the perspective of a doubled philosophy. AI & Soc 34, 195–201 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0800-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0800-5