Introduction

Despite the remarkable efforts that have gone into researching the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy, no reliable predictors have been found. Obesity is associated with diabetic nephropathy risk independently of glycaemic control and hypertension. While liver fat [1] and perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) [2] represent established metabolic determinants, data on the role of different adipose tissue compartments in the development of diabetic nephropathy are still lacking. Renal sinus fat (RSF) constitutes the renal PVAT compartment surrounding the renal artery, renal vein, lymphatic vessels and proximal ureteral portion. PVAT secretes a variety of paracrine factors interacting with immune cells, vascular endothelium and smooth muscle cells [3]. RSF mass is associated with hypertension in diabetes and chronic kidney disease [4, 5].

Given these data, we hypothesised that RSF may play a role in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy and may therefore be associated with microalbuminuria. Several studies have shown that exercise unmasks albuminuria in normoalbuminuric diabetic individuals, assuming that exercise-induced albuminuria may be the earliest sign of diabetic nephropathy. Exercise leads to albuminuria by both modulating glomerular passage and tubular reuptake of albumin [6]. We investigated whether pre- and/or postexercise urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) is associated with RSF in individuals at diabetic risk.

Methods

Participants

Participants were recruited from the Tübingen Lifestyle Intervention Program (TULIP), which investigates possible predictors of successful lifestyle intervention. Individuals at increased diabetic risk (family history of type 2 diabetes, BMI > 27 kg/m2, impaired glucose tolerance or previous gestational diabetes) were recruited from southern Germany. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. All participants gave their written informed consent.

Based upon the availability of urine specimens from the TULIP baseline examination, 176 TULIP participants were selected for RSF quantification. Exclusion of participants with a single kidney (n = 1), pelvic kidneys (n = 2) or insufficient MRI datasets (n = 5) resulted in 168 participants. An exercise test was conducted in 162 participants, of whom 13 were not able to provide postexercise urine within 30 min after cycling. Thus, postexercise ACR was available for 149 participants. For three of these participants, BP data during exercising were incomplete, resulting in a final study cohort of 146 individuals.

Exercise test and laboratory measurements

The participants provided morning spot urine after an overnight fast. An OGTT was performed using a bedside glucose analyser (YSI, Yellow Springs, OH, USA). The participants subsequently underwent an exercise test until exhaustion on a treadmill bicycle (Ergometrics 800 S; ergoline, Bitz, Germany). BP was measured with a sphygmomanometer (Prakticus II; Friedrich Bosch, Bisingen, Germany) before and every 2 min during exercise. Spot urine was collected within 30 min. Urinary albumin was measured nephelometrically (BN ProSpec Nephelometer) and creatinine quantified enzymatically (ADVIA 1800 Clinical Chemistry System; both Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Eschborn, Germany).

Measurement of adipose tissue

MRI (1.5 T whole-body imager, Magnetom Sonata; Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics) was performed in the early morning as described previously [7]. Axial images were recorded applying a T1-weighted fast spin-echo technique: echo time 12 ms, repetition time 490 ms, turbo factor 7, slice thickness 10 mm, gap between slices 10 mm, field of view 480–560 mm. For determination of RSF, the slice which best depicts the entry of the renal artery into the corresponding kidney was selected for each kidney. Two regions of interest were outlined for both kidneys as shown in Fig. 1. Region A (Fig. 1a, dashed line, blue arrow) was chosen for determination of the total kidney volume at this level using a planimetric approach. Region B (continuous line, white arrow) was selected for subsequent measurement of adipose tissue within the renal sinus. In addition, visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue at the umbilical level were quantified [7].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Axial T1-weighted magnetic resonance images taken at the level of entry of the renal arteries into the renal sinus in two subjects with comparable BMI. a Male volunteer (BMI 32.3 kg/m2) with a high amount of PVAT in the renal sinus (RSF). Manually drawn regions of interest for quantification of total kidney area (region A, dashed line, blue arrow) and adipose tissue in the renal sinus (region B, continuous line, white arrow) are drawn in the right kidney. b Male volunteer (BMI 33.5 kg/m2) with a low amount of RSF on both sides. RSF was calculated as the arithmetical mean of B/(A + B) left and right

In order to exclude a systematic bias in RSF measurement (different kidney sizes, etc.), the ratio of renal sinus adipose tissue to total kidney size was calculated using the arithmetical mean (left/right kidney RSF) for each participant. To prove that the selected MRI slices at the level of entry of the renal artery represented the largest renal sinus diameters, control measurements on cranially and caudally neighbouring slices were carried out. Ten participants were randomly selected in every BMI tertile. Cranially adjacent sections demonstrated 4.1 ± 3.2% points (p < 0.0001, paired two-tailed t test) lower RSF content than the original planes. Caudally adjacent section planes amounted to 3.2 ± 2.7% points lower RSF content (p < 0.0001). Since both upper and lower adjacent sections contain significantly less RSF, the selected planes at the entry of the renal artery depict the renal sinuses at their largest diameter and were accepted as a representative surrogate variable for total RSF.

Calculations

BP is expressed as mean arterial BP calculated as 2/3 × diastolic BP + 1/3 × systolic BP. RSF is expressed as a percentage (see above). Glomerular filtration rate was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. Data are given as mean ± SD. Variables with skewed distributions were logarithmically transformed to approximate normal distributions. Associations were assessed by multiple linear regression models using least-squares estimations. Effect sizes are given as standardised beta coefficients (βst) with 95% CI; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical calculations were performed using JMP 8.0 (SAS, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

RSF amounted to 6.9 ± 5.1% of kidney areas. RSF was associated with sex, being significantly higher in male (9.7 ± 5.7%) than in female participants (5.0 ± 3.7%; p < 0.001). RSF was positively associated with age (βst 0.44; 95% CI 0.29, 0.59), BMI (βst 0.3; 95% CI 0.15, 0.46) and VAT (βst 0.64; 95% CI 0.52, 0.77; all p < 0.001). In a multiple linear regression model with sex (βst 0.27; 95% CI 0.13, 0.40 for males), age (βst 0.44; 95% CI 0.31, 0.57) and BMI (βst 0.28; 95% CI 0.15, 0.41) as explanatory variables, all variables were significantly associated with RSF (p < 0.001), but further adjustment for VAT (βst 0.55; 95% CI 0.34, 0.76; p < 0.001) rendered the influence of BMI insignificant (βst −0.03; 95% CI −0.20, 0.14; p = 0.68). RSF showed no association with subcutaneous adipose tissue (βst 0.09; 95% CI −0.07, 0.26; p = 0.28). Smoking showed a trend for an association with postexercise ACR (βst 0.14, 95% CI −0.02, 0.30; p = 0.08) after adjusting for sex, age and BMI, but not with pre-exercise ACR (βst −0.09; 95% CI −0.25, 0.07; p = 0.35). Use of antihypertensive or cholesterol-lowering agents was not associated with pre- (βst −0.02; 95% CI −0.20, 0.16; βst 0.13; 95% CI −0.04, 0.30) or postexercise ACR (βst −0.04; 95% CI −0.22, 0.14; βst 0.03; 95% CI −0.14, 0.20; p > 0.77) in identical models.

Estimated glomerular filtration rate was not associated with RSF after adjustment for age and sex (βst −0.02; 95% CI −0.11, 0.07; p = 0.6) with/without further adjustment for VAT (βst −0.04; 95% CI −0.14, 0.06; p = 0.46).

RSF was not associated with ACR quantified in the morning spot urine (pre-exercise microalbuminuria) and adjusted for sex, age, VAT and resting BP (βst 0.12; 95% CI −0.11, 0.34; p = 0.19). However, RSF was positively associated with postexercise ACR after adjustment for sex, age, VAT and mean arterial peak pressure (MAPP) during exercise (Table 1). RSF maintained its significant association with postexercise ACR (βst 0.30; 95% CI 0.09, 0.51; p = 0.005) even after further adjustment for peak exercise workload. Running association models between RSF and postexercise ACR adjusted for smoking (βst 0.05; 95% CI −0.12, 0.21; p = 0.56), antihypertensive (βst −0.02; 95% CI −0.19, 0.15; p = 0.81) or cholesterol-lowering agents (βst 0.02; 95% CI −0.14, 0.19; p = 0.77) did not change our main finding regarding the association of RSF with postexercise ACR (βst 0.29; 95% CI 0.07, 0.51; p = 0.009; βst 0.30; 95% CI 0.09, 0.51; p = 0.006; βst 0.30; 95% CI 0.09, 0.52; p = 0.006, respectively).

Table 1 Linear regression model depicting the association between postexercise ACR and RSF (independent variable) after adjustment for confounding variables

RSF showed an association with resting BP (βst 0.25; 95% CI 0.09, 0.41; p = 0.003), but it exhibited only a trend for an association with MAPP (βst 0.14; 95% CI −0.02, 0.31; p = 0.08). RSF did not associate with peak BP after adjustment for sex, age, BMI or VAT (βst −0.03; 95% CI −0.22, 0.16; βst −0.09; 95% CI −0.30, 0.11), nor after adjustment for peak exercise load (βst −0.09; 95% CI −0.30, 0.11; all p > 0.38). We decided to adjust our association model between RSF and postexercise ACR for MAPP and not for resting BP, as only MAPP significantly influenced postexercise ACR (βst 0.21; 95% CI 0.05, 0.37; p = 0.009) compared with resting BP (βst 0.08; 95% CI −0.08, 0.25; p = 0.33).

Discussion

Several conceivable mechanisms may explain the association between RSF and albuminuria found in this study. PVAT secretes a multitude of cytokines and the secretion profile differs according to the localisation of PVAT in the vascular tree [8]. Thus, RSF representing the PVAT of renal arteries could influence microalbuminuria independently of VAT mass, as shown in our study. Saturated fatty acids increase endoplasmic reticulum stress in insulin-sensitive tissue [9]. Large perivascular triacylglycerol stores could therefore contribute to local inflammation, which is implicated in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy.

PVAT was proposed as a regulator of insulin-induced vasoreactivity, and defective podocyte-specific insulin signalling plays a role in the aetiology of proteinuria through podocyte damage [10]. It seems conceivable that RSF may modulate both insulin-signalling on vasoreactivity and the podocyte cytoskeleton. A mechanical effect of RSF should also be considered, as pressure on the renal veins and lymph vessels can lead to hyperfiltration.

An important point of uncertainty in our study is the testing of exercise-induced albuminuria. Although physiologically plausible and supported by smaller studies [11, 12], exercise-induced albuminuria remains of uncertain prognostic value. Cortical thinning of the kidneys could theoretically confound the analysis, but this is an age-related phenomenon and age was accounted for in our model. Another limitation might be that the exercise test was carried out immediately after the OGTT. However, this potential confounder was immanent, and 2 h plasma glucose did not associate with postexercise ACR (data not shown).

Our results can be considered as a further piece in the jigsaw puzzle of understanding human diabetic nephropathy. To validate the potential role of RSF for clinical endpoints, longitudinal studies with long-term follow-up must be undertaken. Identification of individuals at greatest risk of later diabetic nephropathy represents a pivotal future challenge in order to focus nephroprotection on those at highest risk.