Abstract
Aims/hypothesis
Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD1) is the rate-limiting enzyme in monounsaturated fatty acid synthesis. It is imperative for the assembly of VLDL particles, which transport triacylglycerol (TG) from liver to adipose tissue and other sites. We aimed to determine the role of hepatic SCD1 activity in human glucose and lipid metabolism.
Methods
We studied 54 people participating in a lifestyle intervention programme with diet modification and increased physical activity. Insulin sensitivity was determined during a euglycaemic–hyperinsulinaemic clamp and estimated from an OGTT. Liver fat was quantified by 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy at baseline and after 9 months of intervention. The pattern of fatty acids in serum VLDL-TGs was determined by ultracentrifugation followed by thin layer and gas chromatography, with the 18:1 n-9: 18:0 ratio providing an index of hepatic SCD1 activity.
Results
The hepatic SCD1 activity index correlated negatively with liver fat (r = −0.29, p = 0.04) and positively with insulin sensitivity, both OGTT-derived (r = 0.42, p = 0.003) and clamp-derived (r = 0.27, p = 0.07). These correlations depended on overall adiposity. They were absent in leaner participants (n = 27, liver fat: p = 0.34, insulin sensitivity [OGTT]: p = 0.75, insulin sensitivity [clamp]: p = 0.24), but were strong in obese individuals (n = 27, p = 0.004, p = 0.0002 and p = 0.006, respectively). Furthermore, during intervention a high SCD1 activity index at baseline predicted a decrease in liver fat only in obese participants (r = −0.46, p = 0.02).
Conclusions/interpretation
Our data suggest that high hepatic SCD1 activity may regulate fat accumulation in the liver and possibly protects from insulin resistance in obesity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the main cause of elevated serum liver enzymes among the general population and generates a wide spectrum of liver damage ranging from simple steatosis to steatohepatitis, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis with end-stage liver disease [1]. NAFLD predicts development of the metabolic syndrome and is involved in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes [1–7]. While these data emphasise the critical role of fatty liver in human metabolism, the mechanisms involved in the process of hepatic fat accumulation in humans are not fully understood. Circulating levels of adiponectin, the adipokine that increases lipid oxidation in liver and skeletal muscle [8, 9], together with genetic variability in the adiponectin receptor genes [10], as well as in the upstream transcription factor 1 and hepatic lipase genes [11], all of which regulate lipolysis and lipid metabolism, may affect hepatic fat accumulation. Furthermore, a high intake of total fat [12, 13] and particularly of saturated fat [14], as well as the amount and the pattern of fatty acids released from adipocytes to the liver [12, 15], may also be involved. However, fatty acids also derive from de novo lipogenesis in the liver [12, 15, 16], which is predominantly regulated by sterol-regulatory binding protein 1c [17]. After the assembly of triacylglycerol (TG), VLDL particles transport fatty acids from the liver to adipose tissue and other sites [17]. The enzyme stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD1), which is predominantly expressed in liver but also in a variety of other tissues, plays an important role in this pathway. SCD1 is a microsomal enzyme that catalyses the synthesis of monounsaturated long-chain fatty acids from saturated fatty acyl-CoAs. The preferred substrates for SCD1 are palmitoyl- (16:0) and stearoyl-CoA (18:0), which are converted to palmitoleoyl- (16:1 n-7) and oleoyl- (18:1 n-9) CoA respectively. These fatty acids in the ester form are the major constituents of VLDL-TGs [18]. The saturated/monounsaturated fatty acid ratio modulates the composition of phospholipids in cell membranes and affects membrane fluidity; differences in this ratio are associated with a number of diseases, including diabetes and obesity [19–23].
Mice with whole-body SCD1 deficiency were lean [24] and had decreased liver fat content [25, 26], suggesting that lack of SCD1 protects from fat accumulation in the liver. However, these lean SCD1-deficient mice developed severe hypercholesterolaemia, had a large decrease in HDL-cholesterol levels and displayed lower VLDL production than the wild-type on a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet [27]. This finding implies that liver-specific downregulation of SCD1 may impair VLDL assembly and thus may abolish the capacity of the liver to clear intrahepatic TG. Accordingly, liver-specific downregulation of SCD1 resulted in an increase, not a decrease in liver fat in rodents [28]. The latter findings suggest that total SCD1 deficiency represents a relatively extreme phenotype that may not easily be compared with human physiology. This is supported by a recent finding that hepatic-specific SCD1 deficiency does not protect from high-fat diet-induced hepatic steatosis or insulin resistance [29].
To our knowledge, there are no data on the relationships of hepatic SCD1 activity with glucose and lipid metabolism in humans. In the present study, we specifically hypothesised that hepatic SCD1 activity may be involved in the pathophysiology of fatty liver and insulin resistance in humans. Therefore, we determined the 18:1 n-9: 18:0 ratio in the serum VLDL-TGs that are assembled in the liver, to estimate hepatic SCD1 activity and tested the relationships of this index with liver fat, as measured by 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1HMRS), and with insulin sensitivity.
Methods
Participants
A total of 54 individuals were included in the present study. They were participating in an ongoing trial to reduce adiposity and to prevent type 2 diabetes [10]. Individuals were recruited from the southern part of Germany. They were randomly included in this study on condition that they fulfilled at least one of the following criteria: a family history of type 2 diabetes, a BMI > 27 kg/m2, previous diagnosis of impaired glucose tolerance or gestational diabetes. The participants were not taking any medication known to affect glucose tolerance or insulin sensitivity. None of them had a history of liver disease or regularly consumed alcohol. They were considered healthy according to a physical examination and routine laboratory tests. Most of them were sedentary and not involved in regular exercise programmes. Participants underwent baseline measurements and had data re-measured at 9 months of follow-up after they had undergone dietary counselling and increased physical activity. Counselling aimed to reduce body weight by ≥5% and total intake of energy (particularly from fat) to <30% of energy consumed, and at increasing intake of fibre to at least 15 g/4187 kJ (1,000 kcal). Furthermore, they were asked to reduce intake of saturated fat to ≤10% of energy. Participants were instructed to increase physical activity and to perform at least 3 h of moderate sports per week. For the day prior to tests, participants were instructed to refrain from heavy exercise and retain their regular diets, mostly consisting of a Western diet at baseline and the aforementioned healthy diet at follow-up. Informed written consent was obtained from all participants and the local medical ethics committee approved the protocol.
Body composition and body fat distribution
Body fat was measured by the bioelectrical impedance method (RJL, Detroit, MI, USA). Visceral fat was measured with an axial T1-weighted fast spin echo technique with a 1.5 T whole-body imager (Magnetom Sonata; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) [30].
1HMRS for quantitative analysis of liver fat
Liver fat was measured by localised 1HMRS as previously described [10]. We chose a liver fat cut-off of 5.5% as the threshold to denote steatosis. This cut-off has been identified to separate participants with fatty liver from healthy control persons [31].
Oral glucose tolerance test
All individuals underwent a 75 g OGTT. We obtained venous plasma samples at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min for determination of plasma glucose and insulin. Glucose tolerance was determined according to the 1997 WHO diagnostic criteria [32]. Insulin sensitivity was calculated from glucose and insulin values during the OGTT, as proposed by Matsuda and DeFronzo [33].
Euglycaemic–hyperinsulinaemic clamp
A total of 48 participants underwent measurements of insulin sensitivity by the euglycaemic–hyperinsulinaemic clamp. At about 07:00 hours, after a 12 h overnight fast, an antecubital vein was cannulated for infusion of insulin and glucose. A dorsal hand vein of the contralateral arm was cannulated and placed under a heating device to permit sampling of arterialised serum. After basal blood was drawn, participants received a primed insulin infusion at a rate of 40 mU m−2 min−1 for 2 h. Blood was drawn every 5 min for determination of serum glucose. Glucose infusion was adjusted appropriately to maintain the fasting glucose level. Insulin sensitivity (μmol kg−1 min−1 [pmol/l]−1) for systemic glucose uptake was calculated as the mean infusion rate of glucose (μmol kg−1 min−1) necessary to maintain euglycaemia during the last 60 min of the euglycaemic–hyperinsulinaemic clamp divided by the steady-state plasma insulin concentration.
Analytical procedures
Plasma and serum glucose, insulin, NEFA and lipids
Serum glucose was determined using a bedside glucose analyser (glucose-oxidase method; YSI, Yellow Springs Instruments, Yellow Springs, CO, USA). For measurement of insulin and total NEFA and lipoproteins, blood was placed on ice after drawing, immediately transferred to the laboratory and subsequently analysed. Plasma insulin was determined by microparticle enzyme immunoassay (ADVIA Centaur; Bayer HealthCare, Fernwald, Germany) and total serum NEFA concentrations were measured with an enzymatic method (WAKO Chemicals, Neuss, Germany). Serum total cholesterol and HDL- and LDL-cholesterol concentrations were measured with a standard colorimetric method using the Bayer analyser (Bayer HealthCare).
Fatty acid pattern
Fasting plasma samples were spun down, frozen immediately and stored at −80°C for analysis of the fatty acid pattern. First, the plasma VLDL-fraction was separated from the HDL- and LDL-cholesterol fraction by ultracentrifugation. For this, 1.5 ml sodium chloride solution (1.006 g/ml) was added to 1.5 ml human plasma. Subsequently, ultracentrifugation at 40,000 rpm (817,480 g) and 10°C was done for 18 h using a preparative ultracentrifuge (Optima; Beckman Coulter, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Afterwards, the top layer (VLDL fraction) was removed and used for further analyses.
Next, the VLDL fraction was divided, using thin layer chromatography (TLC), into five subfractions containing phospholipids, diacylglycerol, NEFA, TG and cholesteryl esters. In detail, the VLDL-fraction was cleared from protein using 2-propanol, n-heptane and 2 mol/l phosphoric acid. Toluol, methanol and water were added, and after centrifugation at 4,000 rpm (8,175 g) the upper phase was dried under nitrogen. The lipids were solved in CHCl3–CH3OH and applied to a silica gel chromatography plate (Merk, Darmstadt, Germany). The phospholipids, diacylglycerol, NEFA, TG and cholesteryl esters were separated using n-hexane, diethylether and acetic acid as a solvent. To identify the localisation of the fractions, a pooled control plasma was also separated on each plate and visualised by 2,7-dichlor-fluoresceine under ultraviolet light. The TG fraction was scraped off the TLC plate, transferred to screw-capped vials and dissolved in methanol/toluol mixture (4:1, vol./vol.) containing cis-13,16,19-docosatrienoic acid as an internal standard. Trans-esterification was performed by incubation with acetyl chloride at 100°C. The cold sample was neutralised with K2CO3 and the upper phase was concentrated to 80 μl under nitrogen. The fatty acid methyl esters were quantified with cis-13,16,19-docosatrienoic acid as the internal standard using gas chromatography with a flame ionisation detector, as previously described [34]. In a subgroup of 38 participants for whom a sufficient sample volume was available, the fatty acid pattern was also determined in the NEFA fraction in serum.
Calculation of the desaturase activity indexes
As 18:0 but not 16:0 is the preferred substrate of SCD1 in humans [35], the 18:1 n-9: 18:0 ratio was calculated as an index of hepatic SCD1 (Δ9) desaturase activity. Furthermore, the 20:4 n-6: 20:3 n-6 and 18:3 n-6: 18:2 n-6 ratios were calculated as indexes of hepatic Δ5 and Δ6 desaturase activities, respectively.
Statistical analyses
Data are given as mean ± SE. Statistical comparison between variables was performed using logarithmically transformed data (for non-normally distributed parameters). Differences between baseline and follow-up were tested using the matched pairs t test. To adjust for the effects of relevant covariates (age, sex, percentage of body fat), multivariate linear regression analyses were performed. A p value≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The statistical software package JMP 4.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) was used.
Results
Baseline data
Characteristics of the population are shown in Table 1. The two sexes were evenly represented. Anthropometrics and metabolic characteristics covered a wide range that was particularly large for body fat, liver fat and insulin sensitivity.
At baseline, the hepatic SCD1 activity index was not different between males (11.2 ± 0.7) and females (9.8 ± 0.7, p = 0.18) and was not correlated with age or total body fat (p ≥ 0.59 for all). The hepatic SCD1 activity index was also not correlated with visceral fat (p = 0.48). However, it was negatively correlated with liver fat (r = −0.29, p = 0.04), when adjusted for sex and body fat in multivariate regression analyses. In addition, participants with fatty liver (n = 21, liver fat >5.5%) had a lower hepatic SCD1 activity index (9.5 ± 0.8) than healthy control participants (n = 33, 11.0 ± 0.7), independently of sex and body fat (p = 0.04).
In univariate analyses, sex and body fat were determinants of metabolic parameters. Regarding the relationships of the hepatic SCD1 activity index, adjusted for sex and body fat in multivariate linear regression analyses, with metabolic parameters, no correlations with fasting glycaemia and NEFA were observed (both p ≥ 0.43). However, the adjusted hepatic SCD1 activity index was negatively correlated with fasting insulinaemia (r = −0.28, p = 0.04), as well as with 2 h glycaemia (r = −0.30, p = 0.03) and 2 h insulinaemia (r = −0.41, p = 0.002). In addition, the adjusted hepatic SCD1 activity index was positively correlated with insulin sensitivity estimated from the OGTT (r = 0.42, p = 0.003). A statistical trend was seen for a positive correlation with insulin sensitivity determined during the clamp (r = 0.27, p = 0.07). Furthermore, the 16:1 n-7: 16:0 ratio also correlated positively with insulin sensitivity by OGTT (r = 0.31, p = 0.02).
Because low insulin sensitivity is associated with a low activity of Δ5 and a high activity of Δ6 desaturases as calculated from product/precursor ratios in muscle and adipose tissue [36], we also investigated whether indices reflecting activities of these enzymes in the liver are associated with liver fat and insulin sensitivity in humans. The indexes of Δ5 (20:4 n-6: 20:3 n-6) and Δ6 (18:3 n-6: 18:2 n-6) desaturase were not correlated with liver fat or insulin sensitivity (p ≥ 0.25 for all).
Since obesity is a strong determinant of high liver fat and insulin resistance, we divided the participants into two groups by the median percentage of body fat (lean, n = 27, body fat 26.5 ± 1%; obese, n = 27, body fat 35.6 ± 1%) and investigated the relationships of hepatic SCD1 activity with liver fat and insulin sensitivity within each group. In lean participants, the hepatic SCD1 activity index, adjusted for sex and body fat, was not correlated with liver fat (p = 0.34) or OGTT-derived (p = 0.75) or clamp-derived insulin sensitivity (p = 0.24; Fig. 1a–c). In contrast, very strong correlations of the index with liver fat and OGTT- and clamp-derived insulin sensitivity measures were found in obese individuals (r = −0.57, p = 0.004; r = 0.69, p = 0.0002; r = 0.58, p = 0.006, respectively, Fig. 1d–f).
Furthermore, we tested the relationships of the SCD1 activity index estimated from the serum NEFA fraction. Under fasting conditions most of the serum NEFA derive from adipose tissue [12]. The adipose tissue SCD1 activity index was positively associated with the hepatic SCD1 index, albeit weakly (r = 0.32, p = 0.053). In obese participants of this subgroup, moreover, the relationships between the hepatic SCD1 activity index and adjusted liver fat (p = 0.002) and insulin sensitivity (p = 0.0002) were stronger than those between the adipose tissue SCD1 activity index and the same two parameters (p = 0.02 and p = 0.02, respectively).
Longitudinal data
Under a lifestyle intervention, there was a significant decrease in BMI, percentage of body fat and visceral fat, as well as a large decrease in liver fat (Table 1). Fasting TG, total and LDL-cholesterol levels, 2 h insulinaemia and both fasting and 2 h glycaemia decreased, while insulin sensitivity increased. Based on the cross-sectional findings between hepatic SCD1 activity and liver fat, we next asked whether the hepatic SCD1 activity index at baseline predicted change in liver fat in prospective analyses. Among parameters at baseline, such as sex, age, total body fat, visceral fat, insulin sensitivity estimated from the OGTT and measured by the clamp, fasting serum NEFA, total cholesterol, LDL- and HDL-cholesterol, TG and the hepatic SCD1 activity index, only sex was significantly associated with change in liver fat in univariate analyses in the lean group (fold-change men = 0.49, women = 0.94, p = 0.03). In contrast, only the hepatic SCD1 activity index was significantly associated with change in liver fat in the obese group (Fig. 2).
Discussion
In the present study, we investigated the role of hepatic SCD1 activity in the pathophysiology of fatty liver and insulin resistance in humans. We found that the hepatic SCD1 activity index, estimated from the fatty acid pattern in serum VLDL-TGs, was negatively associated with liver fat. In contrast, it was not associated with total body fat or visceral fat, which are known determinants of liver fat [1, 7]. Furthermore, the longitudinal data allowed us to determine whether the hepatic SCD1 activity index predicted change in liver fat. A high hepatic SCD1 activity index at baseline was associated with a decrease in liver fat in obese participants. These findings support the hypothesis that hepatic SCD1 activity may regulate liver fat content in humans.
Furthermore, the hepatic SCD1 activity index was also correlated with insulin sensitivity, both that estimated from the OGTT and that determined by the euglycaemic–hyperinsulinaemic clamp. Interestingly, we found a weak correlation of the hepatic SCD1 activity index with insulin sensitivity determined by the clamp, which is a function of both insulin-stimulated glucose disposal and hepatic insulin sensitivity in the suppression of endogenous glucose production. In contrast, the hepatic SCD1 activity index correlated more strongly with insulin sensitivity estimated from the OGTT and derived from fasting values such as the homeostasis model insulin resistance index (p = 0.04, data not shown). The latter two measurements closely represent hepatic insulin resistance [1, 37]. Because of the relationship of hepatic SCD1 activity with liver fat and since fatty liver is closely associated with hepatic insulin resistance [2, 5, 7], these data support the hypothesis that SCD1 may be involved in the regulation of insulin sensitivity via regulation of fat accumulation in the liver. In addition, since high liver fat also induces hepatic, as well as skeletal muscle insulin resistance via increased production of fetuin-A [38], hepatic SCD1 activity may also be involved in the regulation of skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity. In support of this hypothesis, we found a negative correlation between hepatic SCD1 activity and circulating fetuin-A in obese participants (r = −0.53, p = 0.027). The hepatic indexes of the Δ5 and Δ6 desaturases did not display such correlations with liver fat or insulin sensitivity, suggesting that the activities of these enzymes in the liver are less important for the regulation of liver fat and insulin sensitivity in humans.
Because fat in the liver commonly accumulates and insulin sensitivity declines with increasing adiposity, we tested whether the observed correlations depended on adiposity. In lean participants, no correlations were found between hepatic SCD1 activity and both liver fat and insulin sensitivity, whereas very strong correlations were seen in obese participants. There are several possible explanations for these differences. It may be that SCD1 activity becomes important in the regulation of liver fat and insulin sensitivity as adiposity increases. This hypothesis is supported by recent findings that SCD1 activity is upregulated in obesity. Warensjo et al. [23] found that SCD1 activity in serum cholesteryl esters under fasting conditions in humans predicted an increased risk of developing the metabolic syndrome. However, since this association was not independent of obesity and due to the fact that diets with a high amount of saturated fatty acids [36] and glucose [39] increased SCD1 activity, the authors of that report concluded that the observed relationships reflected compensatory upregulation of SCD1 activity to continuous intake of unhealthy diets [23]. Furthermore, in L6 myotubes SCD1 overproduction does not improve insulin signalling in basal conditions, but does protect from fatty acid-induced insulin resistance [40]. These data, together with our findings in humans, suggest that SCD1 may particularly protect from obesity-induced insulin resistance.
In the present study, we estimated hepatic SCD1 activity from the fatty acid pattern within the VLDL-TG fraction. VLDL-TG are synthesised in the liver from fatty acids originating from adipose tissue lipolysis (62%), intra-hepatic de novo lipogenesis (23%) and dietary lipids [12]. Under fasting conditions, serum NEFA predominantly arise from adipose tissue lipolysis (82%) [12]. The SCD1 activity index estimated from the fatty acid pattern within the NEFA fraction was only weakly correlated with the hepatic SCD1 activity index, insulin sensitivity and liver fat. Therefore, the SCD1 activity index estimated from VLDL-TG may not only reflect the fatty acid pattern and SCD1 activity within the adipose tissue, but also hepatic SCD1 activity.
The role of SCD1 activity in lipid and glucose metabolism has been extensively studied in vitro and in rodents, and SCD1 has been identified as a potential drug target to improve insulin sensitivity [41]. Mice lacking whole-body SCD1 were lean, were protected against adiposity [24] and displayed increased insulin signalling in skeletal muscle [42]. They also had decreased liver fat content, suggesting that SCD1 deficiency protected against fatty liver [25, 26]. Interestingly, however, these findings in SCD1-deficient animals were mostly associated with a lean phenotype. Hepatic steatosis can develop in a dietary mouse model despite sustained downregulation of SCD1 [43]. In addition, total SCD1 deficiency resulted in a noticeable phenotype with alopecia [44], abnormalities in the epidermal lipid barrier leading to breakdown of thermoregulation and a metabolic wasting syndrome that could in part explain the excessive energy expenditure [45]. Moreover, SCD1-deficient mice on a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet developed severe hypercholesterolaemia and had a large decrease in HDL-cholesterol levels [27]. In this respect it is also important to mention that loss of hepatic SCD1 activity leads to significantly lower VLDL-TG content in vivo and TG secretion in isolated hepatocytes [18, 46]. Furthermore, hepatic SCD1 and diacylglycerol acyltransferase closely interact for the final step of TG synthesis and control their composition and subsequent secretion as VLDL [47]. Thus, the latter findings suggest that liver-specific downregulation of SCD1 may impair VLDL assembly and subsequently may reduce the capacity of the liver to clear intrahepatic TG. This hypothesis was supported by recent data showing that reduction of hepatic SCD1 expression by antisense oligonucleotides did not result in a decrease, but in an increase in hepatic lipid content in rodents [28]. In addition, very recently and in contrast to whole-body SCD1 deficiency [25, 26], hepatic-specific SCD1 deficiency did not protect from high-fat diet-induced hepatic steatosis or insulin resistance [29]. Furthermore, it was shown that: (1) genetically obese (ob/ob) whole-body SCD1-deficient mice displayed an accelerated progression to severe diabetes [48]; (2) high SCD1 activity protected both from obesity and from palmitate-induced insulin resistance and lipotoxicity [40, 49]; and (3) the insulin-sensitisers thiazolidinediones increased the expression of SCD1 mRNA in adipose tissue and this increased expression of SCD1 was associated with increased insulin sensitivity [50]. Therefore, it is necessary to precisely test the effects of more moderate regulation of SCD1 activity on metabolism, particularly in the light of SCD1 having become an important drug target.
In conclusion, with this approach we provide novel data that a high hepatic SCD1 activity index is associated with low liver fat content and high insulin sensitivity in obese participants. These data suggest that high hepatic SCD1 activity may protect from fat accumulation in the liver and insulin resistance in obesity.
Abbreviations
- 1HMRS:
-
proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy
- NAFLD:
-
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
- SCD1:
-
stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1
- TG:
-
triacylglycerol
- TLC:
-
thin layer chromatography
References
Angulo P (2002) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med 346:1221–1231
Kelley DE, McKolanis TM, Hegazi RA, Kuller LH, Kalhan SC (2003) Fatty liver in type 2 diabetes mellitus: relation to regional adiposity, fatty acids, and insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 285:E906–E916
Marchesini G, Babini M (2006) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the metabolic syndrome. Minerva Cardioangiol 54:229–239
Petersen KF, Dufour S, Feng J et al (2006) Increased prevalence of insulin resistance and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Asian-Indian men. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:18273–18277
Roden M (2006) Mechanisms of disease: hepatic steatosis in type 2 diabetes—pathogenesis and clinical relevance. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 2:335–348
Targher G, Bertolini L, Poli F et al (2005) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of future cardiovascular events among type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes 54:3541–3546
Utzschneider KM, Kahn SE (2006) Review: The role of insulin resistance in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:4753–4761
Bugianesi E, Pagotto U, Manini R et al (2005) Plasma adiponectin in nonalcoholic fatty liver is related to hepatic insulin resistance and hepatic fat content, not to liver disease severity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:3498–3504
Kantartzis K, Rittig K, Balletshofer B et al (2006) The relationships of plasma adiponectin with a favorable lipid profile, decreased inflammation, and less ectopic fat accumulation depend on adiposity. Clin Chem 52:1934–1942
Stefan N, Machicao F, Staiger H et al (2005) Polymorphisms in the gene encoding adiponectin receptor 1 are associated with insulin resistance and high liver fat. Diabetologia 48:2282–2291
Kantartzis K, Fritsche A, Machicao F et al (2007) Upstream transcription factor 1 gene polymorphisms are associated with high antilipolytic insulin sensitivity and show gene–gene interactions. J Mol Med 85:55–61
Donnelly KL, Smith CI, Schwarzenberg SJ, Jessurun J, Boldt MD, Parks EJ (2005) Sources of fatty acids stored in liver and secreted via lipoproteins in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Invest 115:1343–1351
Westerbacka J, Lammi K, Hakkinen AM et al (2005) Dietary fat content modifies liver fat in overweight nondiabetic subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:2804–2809
Tiikkainen M, Bergholm R, Vehkavaara S et al (2003) Effects of identical weight loss on body composition and features of insulin resistance in obese women with high and low liver fat content. Diabetes 52:701–707
Hudgins LC, Hellerstein M, Seidman C, Neese R, Diakun J, Hirsch J (1996) Human fatty acid synthesis is stimulated by a eucaloric low fat, high carbohydrate diet. J Clin Invest 97:2081–2091
Ueki K, Kadowaki T, Kahn CR (2005) Role of suppressors of cytokine signaling SOCS-1 and SOCS-3 in hepatic steatosis and the metabolic syndrome. Hepatol Res 33:185–192
Taskinen MR (2003) Diabetic dyslipidaemia: from basic research to clinical practice. Diabetologia 46:733–749
Miyazaki M, Kim YC, Ntambi JM (2001) A lipogenic diet in mice with a disruption of the stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 gene reveals a stringent requirement of endogenous monounsaturated fatty acids for triglyceride synthesis. J Lipid Res 42:1018–1024
Jones BH, Maher MA, Banz WJ et al (1996) Adipose tissue stearoyl-CoA desaturase mRNA is increased by obesity and decreased by polyunsaturated fatty acids. Am J Physiol 271:E44–E49
Pan DA, Lillioja S, Milner MR et al (1995) Skeletal muscle membrane lipid composition is related to adiposity and insulin action. J Clin Invest 96:2802–2808
Storlien LH, Jenkins AB, Chisholm DJ, Pascoe WS, Khouri S, Kraegen EW (1991) Influence of dietary fat composition on development of insulin resistance in rats. Relationship to muscle triglyceride and omega-3 fatty acids in muscle phospholipid. Diabetes 40:280–289
Vessby B, Aro A, Skarfors E, Berglund L, Salminen I, Lithell H (1994) The risk to develop NIDDM is related to the fatty acid composition of the serum cholesterol esters. Diabetes 43:1353–1357
Warensjo E, Riserus U, Vessby B (2005) Fatty acid composition of serum lipids predicts the development of the metabolic syndrome in men. Diabetologia 48:1999–2005
Ntambi JM, Miyazaki M, Stoehr JP et al (2002) Loss of stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 function protects mice against adiposity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:11482–11486
Cohen P, Miyazaki M, Socci ND et al (2002) Role for stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 in leptin-mediated weight loss. Science 297:240–243
Dobrzyn P, Dobrzyn A, Miyazaki M et al (2004) Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 deficiency increases fatty acid oxidation by activating AMP-activated protein kinase in liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:6409–6414
Flowers MT, Groen AK, Oler AT et al (2006) Cholestasis and hypercholesterolemia in SCD1-deficient mice fed a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet. J Lipid Res 47:2668–2680
Gutierrez-Juarez R, Pocai A, Mulas C et al (2006) Critical role of stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 (SCD1) in the onset of diet-induced hepatic insulin resistance. J Clin Invest 116:1686–1695
Miyazaki M, Flowers MT, Sampath H et al (2007) Hepatic stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 deficiency protects mice from carbohydrate-induced adiposity and hepatic steatosis. Cell Metab 6:484–496
Machann J, Thamer C, Schnoedt B et al (2005) Standardized assessment of whole body adipose tissue topography by MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:455–462
Szczepaniak LS, Nurenberg P, Leonard D et al (2005) Magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure hepatic triglyceride content: prevalence of hepatic steatosis in the general population. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 288:E462–E468
Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus (1997) Report of the Expert Committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 20:1183–1197
Matsuda M, DeFronzo RA (1999) Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp. Diabetes Care 22:1462–1470
Stefan N, Wahl HG, Fritsche A, Haring H, Stumvoll M (2001) Effect of the pattern of elevated free fatty acids on insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion in healthy humans. Horm Metab Res 33:432–438
Kim YC, Gomez FE, Fox BG, Ntambi JM (2000) Differential regulation of the stearoyl-CoA desaturase genes by thiazolidinediones in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. J Lipid Res 41:1310–1316
Vessby B, Gustafsson IB, Tengblad S, Boberg M, Andersson A (2002) Desaturation and elongation of fatty acids and insulin action. Ann NY Acad Sci 967:183–195
Meyer C, Pimenta W, Woerle HJ et al (2006) Different mechanisms for impaired fasting glucose and impaired postprandial glucose tolerance in humans. Diabetes Care 29:1909–1914
Stefan N, Hennige AM, Staiger H et al (2006) Alpha2-Heremans-Schmid glycoprotein/fetuin-A is associated with insulin resistance and fat accumulation in the liver in humans. Diabetes Care 29:853–857
Houdali B, Wahl HG, Kresi M et al (2003) Glucose oversupply increases Delta9-desaturase expression and its metabolites in rat skeletal muscle. Diabetologia 46:203–212
Pinnamaneni SK, Southgate RJ, Febbraio MA, Watt MJ (2006) Stearoyl CoA desaturase 1 is elevated in obesity but protects against fatty acid-induced skeletal muscle insulin resistance in vitro. Diabetologia 49:3027–3037
Dobrzyn A, Ntambi JM (2005) Stearoyl-CoA desaturase as a new drug target for obesity treatment. Obes Rev 6:169–174
Rahman SM, Dobrzyn A, Dobrzyn P, Lee SH, Miyazaki M, Ntambi JM (2003) Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 deficiency elevates insulin-signaling components and down-regulates protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B in muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:11110–11115
Toye AA, Dumas ME, Blancher C et al (2007) Subtle metabolic and liver gene transcriptional changes underlie diet-induced fatty liver susceptibility in insulin-resistant mice. Diabetologia 50:1867–1879
Miyazaki M, Dobrzyn A, Elias PM, Ntambi JM (2005) Stearoyl-CoA desaturase-2 gene expression is required for lipid synthesis during early skin and liver development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:12501–12506
Binczek E, Jenke B, Holz B, Gunter RH, Thevis M, Stoffel W (2007) Obesity resistance of the stearoyl-CoA desaturase-deficient (scd1−/−) mouse results from disruption of the epidermal lipid barrier and adaptive thermoregulation. Biol Chem 388:405–418
Legrand P, Catheline D, Fichot MC, Lemarchal P (1997) Inhibiting delta9-desaturase activity impairs triacylglycerol secretion in cultured chicken hepatocytes. J Nutr 127:249–256
Man WC, Miyazaki M, Chu K, Ntambi J (2006) Colocalization of SCD1 and DGAT2: implying preference for endogenous monounsaturated fatty acids in triglyceride synthesis. J Lipid Res 47:1928–1939
Flowers JB, Rabaglia ME, Schueler KL et al (2007) Loss of stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 improves insulin sensitivity in lean mice but worsens diabetes in leptin-deficient obese mice. Diabetes 56:1228–1239
Busch AK, Gurisik E, Cordery DV et al (2005) Increased fatty acid desaturation and enhanced expression of stearoyl coenzyme A desaturase protects pancreatic beta-cells from lipoapoptosis. Diabetes 54:2917–2924
Riserus U, Tan GD, Fielding BA et al (2005) Rosiglitazone increases indexes of stearoyl-CoA desaturase activity in humans: link to insulin sensitization and the role of dominant-negative mutation in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma. Diabetes 54:1379–1384
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all participants for their cooperation. The study was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KFO 114), the European Community’s FP6 EUGENE2 (LSHM-CT-2004-512013) and the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport of the Czech Republic (MSM0021627502).
Duality of interest
The authors declare that there is no duality of interest associated with this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
N. Stefan and A. Peter contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stefan, N., Peter, A., Cegan, A. et al. Low hepatic stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 activity is associated with fatty liver and insulin resistance in obese humans. Diabetologia 51, 648–656 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-008-0938-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-008-0938-7