Skip to main content
Log in

Hybrid performance in taro (Colocasia esculenta) in relation to genetic dissimilarity of parents

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Taro (Colocasia esculenta) breeding, as other root crop breeding, is based on the production and evaluation of large numbers of hybrids. The selection of parents is based on their phenotypic value in the absence of information concerning general combining ability (GCA), specific combining ability (SCA), or genetic distances between varieties. By combining data from heritability trials and from genetic diversity studies conducted with AFLP and SSR markers, we aimed at studying the relationship between hybrid vigour and genetic dissimilarity between parents. The traits studied included number of suckers, corm weight, corm dimensions, and dry matter content. Correlation coefficients between hybrid gain and dissimilarity values were calculated. The prediction of hybrid performance based on the mid-parent value was compared to the prediction based on a modified expression that takes into account the genetic relationships between parents. Correlations were all but one positive but not statistically significant for all traits, with the exception of the number of suckers, when using SSR markers for dissimilarity calculations. Accordingly, the genetic dissimilarities in the prediction of hybrid performances did not increase the correlation between predicted and observed hybrid vigour values. However, large differences were observed among the residual means from the regression between predicted and observed values when using AFLP or SSR markers, mainly due to the much higher polymorphism revealed by the latter. Models need to be further adapted to the type of molecular marker used, since their ability to reveal different rates of polymorphism will have a direct incidence on the calculation of genetic dissimilarities between genotypes. Nevertheless, since SSR markers are more polymorphic and more informative than AFLP markers, they should be preferentially used for these studies. Low genetic dissimilarity of parents yielded weak heterosis effects and future studies need to be conducted by using a broader genetic base. This is the first study assessing the relationship of hybrid vigour with the genetic distances between parents, conducted on a tropical root crop.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernardo R (1992) Relationship between single-cross performance and molecular marker heterozygosity. Theor Appl Genet 83:628–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos H, Pérez JC, Iglesias C, Fregene M, Calle J, Jaramillo G, Morante N, López J (2006) The use of double-haploids in cassava breeding. In: Howeler RH (ed) Cassava research and development in Asia: exploring new opportunities for an ancient crop. Proceedings of the 7th Regional Cassava Workshop, DOA-CIAT, Bangkok, Thailand, pp 150–160

  • Charcosset A, Essioux L (1994) The effect of population structure on the relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci. Theor Appl Genet 89:336–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charcosset A, Gallais A (2003) Application of markers in selection. In: de Vienne D (ed) Molecular markers in plants genetics and biotechnology. Science Publishers, Enfield, NH, pp 53–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Charcosset A, Lefort-Buson M, Gallais A (1991) Relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci: a theoretical computation. Theor Appl Genet 81:571–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chardon F, Virlon B, Moreau L, Falque M, Joets J, Decousset L, Murigneux A, Charcosset A (2004) Genetic architecture of flowering time in maize as inferred from QTL meta-analysis and synteny conservation with the rice genome. Genetics 168:2169–2185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ivancic A, Lebot V (2000) The genetics and breeding of taro. Séries Repères, CIRAD, Montpellier

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivancic A, Okpul T (1995) Population approach to genetic improvement of taro (Colocasia esculenta). In: Taro seminar, 26–30 June 1995, Papua New Guinea University of Technology, Lae

  • Ivancic A, Quero-García J, Lebot V (2003) Development of visual tools for selecting qualitative corm characteristics of taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott). Aust J Agri Res 54:581–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivancic A, Lebot V, Roupsard O, Quero-García J, Okpul T (2004) Thermogenic flowering of taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott, Araceae). Can J Bot 82:1557–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreike CM, van Eck H, Lebot V (2004) Genetic diversity in taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) from South East Asia and Oceania. Theor Appl Genet 109:761–768

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lebot V, Aradhya KM (1991) Isozyme variation in taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) from Asia and Oceania. Euphytica 56:55–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Lübberstedt T, Melchinger AE, Fahr S, Clein D, Dally A, Westhoff P (1998) QTLs mapping in testcrosses of flint lines of maize: III. Comparison across populations for forage traits. Crop Sci 40:783–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace ES, Godwin I (2002) Development and characterization of polymorphic microsatellites markers in taro (Colocasia esculenta). Genome 45:823–832

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malécot G (1948) Les mathématiques de l’hérédité. Masson et Cie, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchinger AE (1999) Genetic diversity and heterosis. In: Coors CG, Pandley S (eds) Genetics and and exploitation of heterosis in crops. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 98–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. The American Naturalist 106:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noyer JL, Weber A, Billot C, Brottier P, Quero-García J, Lebot V (2006) Genetic diversity of taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) assessed by SSR markers. In: Guarino L, Taylor M (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd International Taro Symposium (SPC-IPGRI-FAO-CIRAD), Nadi, Fiji. 21–23 May 2003, Secretariat of the Pacific Community, Nouméa, New Caledonia

  • Okpul T (2002) Genetic studies on taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) : diversity and adaptability of selected genotypes. M.S. thesis. Papua New Guinea University of Technology, Lae, Papua New Guinea

  • Panter DM, Allen FL (1995) Using best linear unbiased predictions to enhance breeding for yield in soybean. II. Selection of superior crosses from a limited number of yield trials. Crop Sci 35:405–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Purseglove JW (1979) Tropical crops––Monocotyledons. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Quero-García J, Noyer JL, Perrier X, Marchand JL, Lebot V (2004) A germplasm stratification of taro (Colocasia esculenta) based on agro-morphological descriptors, validation by AFLP markers. Euphytica 137:387–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quero-García J, Noyer JL, Weber A, Perrier X, McKey D, Lebot V (2006a) Recombination and clonality in taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott): implications for the evolution of cultivar diversity. In: 14th Triennial Symposium of the International Society for Tropical Root Trops, Thiruvananthapuram, India

  • Quero-García J, Ivancic A, Letourmy P, Feldmann P, Molisale T, Lebot V (2006b) Heritability of the main agronomic traits of taro. Crop Sci 46:2368–2375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quero-García J, Courtois B, Ivancic A, Letourmy P, Risterucci AM, Noyer JL, Lebot V (2006c) First genetic maps and QTL studies of yield traits of taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott). Euphytica 151:187–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1999–2001) SAS Release 8.02. Cary, NC, USA

  • Sivan P, Tavalqia MB (1984) First two taro varieties developed from breeding program released for commercial production. Fiji Agri J 46:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Michener CDA (1958) A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ Kansas Sci Bull 38:1409–1438

    Google Scholar 

  • TANSAO (Taro Network for Southeast Asia, Oceania) (2002) Final report (covering period from January 1998 to December 2001. CIRAD, Montpellier, France, p 207

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenkouano A, Crouch JH, Crouch HK, Vuylsteke D, Ortiz R (1999) Comparison of DNA marker and pedigree-based methods of genetic analysis in plantain and banana (Musa spp.) clones. II. Predicting hybrid performance. Theor Appl Genet 98:69–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weightman B (1989) Agriculture in Vanuatu. A historical review. The British Friends of Vanuatu, Portsmouth

    Google Scholar 

  • White TL, Hodge GR (1988) Best linear prediction of breeding values in a forest tree improvement program. Theor Appl Genet 76:719–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JE, Sivan P, Munroe C (1991) Alafua sunrise and Samoa hybrid improved the production of taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) in the Pacific. In: Ofori F, Hahn SK (eds) Proceedings of 9th Symposium of the International Society for Tropical Root Crops, pp 453–461

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Taro Network for Southeast Asia and Oceania (TANSAO), a project funded by the INCO programme of the European Union (DG XII) (grant no. ERBIC18CT970205). The authors are thankful to the Vanuatu Agricultural Research and Training Center (VARTC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Quero-García.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Bradshaw.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quero-García, J., Letourmy, P., Ivancic, A. et al. Hybrid performance in taro (Colocasia esculenta) in relation to genetic dissimilarity of parents. Theor Appl Genet 119, 213–221 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-1030-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-1030-5

Keywords

Navigation