Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Positive assortative mating with selection restrictions on group coancestry enhances gain while conserving genetic diversity in long-term forest tree breeding

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selection and mating principles in a closed breeding population (BP) were studied by computer simulation. The BP was advanced, either by random assortment of mates (RAM), or by positive assortative mating (PAM). Selection was done with high precision using clonal testing. Selection considered both genetic gain and gene diversity by "group-merit selection", i.e. selection for breeding value weighted by group coancestry of the selected individuals. A range of weights on group coancestry was applied during selection to vary parent contributions and thereby adjust the balance between gain and diversity. This resulted in a series of scenarios with low to high effective population sizes measured by status effective number. Production populations (PP) were selected only for gain, as a subset of the BP. PAM improved gain in the PP substantially, by increasing the additive variance (i.e. the gain potential) of the BP. This effect was more pronounced under restricted selection when parent contributions to the next generation were more balanced with within-family selection as the extreme, i.e. when a higher status effective number was maintained in the BP. In that case, the additional gain over the BP mean for the clone PP and seed PPs was 32 and 84% higher, respectively, for PAM than for RAM in generation 5. PAM did not reduce gene diversity of the BP but increased inbreeding, and in that way caused a departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The effect of inbreeding was eliminated by recombination during the production of seed orchard progeny. Also, for a given level of inbreeding in the seed orchard progeny or in a mixture of genotypes selected for clonal deployment, gain was higher for PAM than for RAM. After including inbreeding depression in the simulation, inbreeding was counteracted by selection, and the enhancement of PAM on production population gain was slightly reduced. In the presence of inbreeding depression the greatest PP gain was achieved at still higher levels of status effective number, i.e. when more gene diversity was conserved in the BP. Thus, the combination of precise selection and PAM resulted in close to maximal short-term PP gain, while conserving maximal gene diversity in the BP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson E, Jansson R, Lindgren D (1974) Some results from second generation crossings involving inbreeding in Norway spruce (Picea abies). Silvae Genet 23:34–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker RJ (1986) Selection indices in plant breeding. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA

  • Ballou JD, Lacy RC (1995) Identifying genetically important individuals for management of genetic variation in pedigreed populations, Chap. 5. In: Ballou JD, Gilpin M, Foose TJ (eds) Population management for survival and recovery: analytical methods and strategies in small population conservation. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 76–111

  • Borralho NMG (1994) Heterogeneous selfing rates and dominance effects in estimating heritabilities from open-pollinated progeny. Can J For Res 24:1079–1082

    Google Scholar 

  • Buijtenen van JP (1976) Mating designs. In: Proc IUFRO Joint meeting of genetic working parties on advanced generation breeding, Bordeaux, 14–18 June 1976. Institut national de la recherche agronomique, Cestas, France, pp 11–20

  • Buijtenen van JP, Burdon RD (1990) Expected efficiencies of mating designs for advanced generation selection. Can J For Res 20:1648–1663

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer MG (1971) The effect of selection on genetic variability. Am Natl 105:201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer MG (1976) The effect of selection on genetic variability: a simulation study. Genet Res 28:101–117

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer MG (1980) The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics. Clarendon Press, Oxford

  • Burdon RD, Namkoong G (1983) Short note: multiple populations and sublines. Silvae Genet 32:221–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdon RD, Shelbourne CJA, Wilcox MD (1977) Advanced selection strategies. In: Proc FAO IUFRO Third World Consultation on Forest Tree Breeding, Canberra, Australia, 21–26 March 1977, Vol. 2. CSIRO, Canberra, Australia, pp 1133–1147

  • Caballero A (1994) Developments in prediction of effective population size. Heredity 73:657–679

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cockerham CC (1967) Group inbreeding and coancestry. Genetics 56:89–104

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cotterill PP (1984) A plan for breeding radiata pine. Silvae Genet 33:84–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotterill PP, Dean CA, Cameron J, Brindbergs M (1989) Nucleus breeding: a new strategy for rapid improvement under clonal forestry. In: Gibson GL, Griffin AR, Matheson AC (eds) Breeding tropical trees: population structure and genetic improvement strategies in clonal and seedling forestry: Proc Conf held in Pattaya, Thailand, 28 November to 3 December 1988, by IUFRO Working Parties S2.02-08 Tropical species provenances and breeding, and S2.02-09 Eucalypt provenances and breeding. Oxford Forestry Institute, Oxford, UK and Winrock International, Arlington, Virginia, pp 39–51

  • Crow JF, Felsenstein J (1968) The effects of assortative mating on the genetic composition of a population. Eugenics Quart 15:85–97

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crow JF, Kimura M (1970) An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper and Row, New York

  • Danell Ö (1991a) Survey of past, current and future Swedish forest tree breeding. Silvae Fenn 25:241–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Danell Ö (1991b) Possible gains in initial stages of a national tree improvement programme using different techniques. For Tree Improv 23. Proc Nordic Tree Breeders Meeting, September 1990, Hørsholm, Denmark pp 11–30

  • Danell Ö (1993a) Tree breeding strategy: are we too concerned conservationists but inefficient breeders. In: Lee SJ (ed) Progeny testing and breeding strategies: Proceedings of the Nordic Group of Tree Breeders, Edinburgh, 6–10 October 1993. Forestry Authority, Scotland, pp 80–94

  • Danell Ö (1993b) Breeding programmes in Sweden. 1. General approach. In: Lee SJ (ed) Progeny testing and breeding strategies: Proceedings of the Nordic Group of Tree Breeders, Edinburgh, 6–10 Oct 1993. Forestry Authority, Scotland, pp 128 (i–v)

  • de Boer IJM, van Arendonk JAM (1992) Prediction of additive and dominance effects in selected and unselected populations with inbreeding. Theor Appl Genet 84:451–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempfle L (1975) A note on increasing the limit of selection through selection within families. Genet Res 24:127–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Durel CE, Bertin P, Kremer A (1996) Relationship between inbreeding depression and inbreeding coefficient in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster). Theor Appl Genet 92:347–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson G, Schelander B, Åkebrand V (1973) Inbreeding depression in old experimental plantations of Picea abies. Hereditas 73:185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th (edn). Longman, London and New York

  • Fernando RL, Gianola G (1986) Effect of assortative mating on genetic change due to selection. Theor Appl Genet 72:395–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1918) The correlation between relatives on the assumption of Mendelian inheritance. Trans Roy Soc Edn 52:399–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster GS (1986) Making clonal forestry pay: breeding and selection for extreme genotypes. In: Conference Proceedings IUFRO Joint Meeting of Working Parties on Breeding Theory, Progeny Testing, Seed Orchards, 13–17 October 1986, Williamsburg, Virginia, North Carolina State University – Industry Cooperative Tree Improvement Program, Raleigh, North Carolina, pp 582–590

  • Foster GS (1993) Selection and breeding for extreme genotypes, chapter 5 Clonal forestry, vol. 1: genetics and biotechnology. In: Ahuja MR, Libby WJ (eds) Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 50–67

  • Gea LD, Lindgren D, Shelbourne CJA, Mullin T (1997) Complementing inbreeding coefficient information with status number: implications for structuring breeding populations. NZ J For Sci 27:225–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianola D (1982) Assortative mating and the genetic correlation. Theor Appl Genet 62:225–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin AR, Lindgren D (1985) Effect of inbreeding on production of filled seed in Pinus radiata – experimental results and a model of gene action. Theor Appl Genet 71:334–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin AR, Cotterill PP (1988) Genetic variation in growth of outcrossed, selfed and open-pollinated progenies of Eucalyptus regnans and some implications for breeding strategy. Silvae Genet 37:124–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundy B, Luo ZW, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA (1998) The use of Mendelian indices to reduce the rate of inbreeding in selection programmes. J Anim Breed Genet 115:39–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Raya L, Burnside EB (1990) The effect of repeated cycles of selection on genetic variance, heritability, and response. Theor Appl Genet 79: 568–574

    Google Scholar 

  • James JW (1977) Open nucleus breeding systems. J Anim Prod 24:287–305

    Google Scholar 

  • James JW (1978) Effective population size in open nucleus breeding schemes. Acta Agric Scand 28:387–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorjani H (1995a) Genetic studies of assortative mating in selected and unselected populations Publication No. 122, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

  • Jorjani H (1995b) Assortative mating and selection in populations of various sizes: a review of the literature. Publication No. 121, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

  • Jorjani H, Engström G, Strandberg E, Liljedahl L-E (1997a) Genetic studies of assortative mating – a simulation study. I. Characteristics of the control populations. Acta Agric Scand, Sect A, Animal Sci 47:65–73

  • Jorjani H, Engström G, Strandberg E, Liljedahl L-E (1997b) Genetic studies of assortative mating – a simulation study. II. Assortative mating in unselected populations. Acta Agric Scand, Sect A, Animal Sci 47:74–81

  • Jorjani H, Engström G, Strandberg E, Liljedahl L-E (1997c) Genetic studies of assortative mating – a simulation study. III. Assortative mating in selected populations. Acta Agric Scand, Sect A, Animal Sci 47:129–137

  • Jorjani H, Engström G, Strandberg E, Liljedahl L-E (1998) Assortative mating and dominance variance. Proc 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 11–16 January 1998, Armidale, NSW, Australia, pp 45–48

  • Karlsson B, Rosvall O (1993) Breeding programmes in Sweden 3. Norway spruce. In: Lee SJ (ed) Progeny testing and breeding strategies. Proceedings of the Nordic Group of Tree Breeders, Edinburgh, 6–10 October 1993. Forestry Authority, Scotland, pp 135–141

  • Kerr RJ (1998) Asymptotic rates of response from forest tree breeding strategies using best linear unbiased prediction. Theor Appl Genet 96:484–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr RJ, Goddard ME, Jarvis SF (1998) Maximising genetic response in tree breeding with constraints on group coancestry. Silvae Genet 47:165–173

    Google Scholar 

  • King JN, Johnson GR (1993) Monte Carlo simulation models of breeding-population advancement. Silvae Genet 42:68–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Koski V (1973) On self-pollination, genetic load, and subsequent inbreeding in some coniferous. Comm Inst For Fenn 78:1–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy RC (1995) Clarification of genetic terms and their use in the management of captive populations. Zoo Biol 14:565–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesica P, Allendorf FW (1992) Are small populations of plants worth preserving? Conserv Biol 6:135–139

  • Lindgren D (1986) How should breeders respond to breeding values? In: Conference Proc IUFRO Joint Meeting of Working Parties on Breeding Theory, Progeny Testing, Seed Orchards, 13–17 October 1986, Williamsburg, Virginia, North Carolina State University – Industry Cooperative Tree Improvement Program, Raleigh, North Carolina, pp 361–371

  • Lindgren D, Gregorius HR (1976) Inbreeding and coancestry. Proc IUFRO Joint Meeting of Genetic Working Parties on Advanced Generation Breeding, Bordeaux, 14–18 June 1976. Institut national de la recherche agronomique, Cestas, France, pp 49–72

  • Lindgren D, Kang KS (1997) Status number – a useful tool for tree breeding. Res Rep For Genet Res Inst Korea 33:154–165

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren D, Mullin TJ (1997) Balancing gain and relatedness in selection. Silvae Genet 46:124–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren D, Mullin TJ (1998) Relatedness and status number in seed orchard crops. Can J For Res 28:276–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren D, Gea LD, Jefferson PA (1996) Loss of genetic diversity monitored by status number. Silvae Genet. 45:52–59

  • Mahalovich MF (1990) Modelling positive assortative mating and elite populations in recurrent selection programs for general combining ability. PhD thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina

  • McBride G, Robertson A (1963) Selection using assortative mating in Drosophila malanogaster. Genet Res 4:356–369

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeand SE, Bridgwater FE (1998) A strategy for the third breeding cycle of loblolly pine in southern U.S. Silvae Genet 47:223–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Meuwissen THE (1997) Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. J Anim Sci 75:934–940

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meuwissen THE, Woolliams JA (1994) Effective sizes of livestock populations to prevent a decline in fitness. Theor Appl Genet 89:1019–1026

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller JP, James JW (1983a) Effect on linkage disequilibrium of selection for a quantitative character with epistasis. Theor Appl Genet 65:25–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller JP, James JW (1983b) Effects of reduced variance due to selection in open nucleus breeding systems. Aust J Agric Res 34:53–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullin TJ, Park YS (1995) Stochastic simulation of population management strategies for tree breeding: a new decision support tool for personal computers. Silvae Genet 44:132–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3321–3323

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1977) F-statistics and analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Ann Human Genet 41:225–233

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quinton M, Smith C, Goddard ME (1992) Comparison of selection methods at the same level of inbreeding. J Anim Sci 70:1060–1067

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roden JA (1995) Review of the theory of open nucleus breeding systems. Anim Breed Abstr 62:151–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosvall O, Andersson E (1999) Group-merit selection compared to conventional restricted selection for trade-offs between genetic gain and diversity. For Genet 6:11–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosvall O, Lindgren D, Mullin T (1998) Sustainability robustness and efficiency of a multi-generation breeding strategy based on within-family clonal selection. Silvae Genet 47:307–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosvall O, Mullin TJ, Lindgren D (2003) Controlling parent contributions during positive assortative mating and selection increases gain in long-term forest tree breeding (in press)

  • Shepherd RK, Kinghorn BP (1994) A deterministic multitier model of assortative mating following selection. Genet Sel Evol 26:495–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrøppa T (1996) Diallel crosses in Picea abies. II. Performance and inbreeding depression of selfed families. For Genet 3:69–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith C, Quinton M (1993) The effect of selection in sublines and crossing on genetic response and inbreeding. J Anim Sci 71:2631–2638

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SP, Hammond K (1987) Assortative mating and artificial selection: a second appraisal. Genet Sel Evol 19:181–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallis GM, Leppard P (1988) The joint effects of selection and assortative mating on multiple polygenic characters. Theor Appl Genet 75:278–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrier E, Colleau JJ, Folley JL (1989) Effect of mass selection on the within-family variance in finite populations. Theor Appl Genet 77:141–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrier E, Colleau JJ, Folley JL (1990) Predicting cumulative response to directional selection in finite panmictic populations. Theor Appl Genet 79:833–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrier E, Colleau JJ, Foulley JL (1991) Methods for predicting response to selection in small populations under additive genetic models: a review. Livest Prod Sci 29:93–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetta A (1976) Dominance variance in Fisher's model of assortative mating. Ann Hum Genet 39:447–453

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Villanueva B, Wooliams JA (1997) Optimization of breeding programmes under index selection and constrained inbreeding. Genet Res 69:145–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (1996) Deviation from Hardy-Weinberg proportions in finite populations. Genet Res 68:249–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (1997a) Effective size and F-statistics of subdivided populations. I. Monoecious species with partial selfing. Genetics 146:1453–1463

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (1997b) Effect of excluding sib matings on inbreeding coefficient and effective size of finite diploid populations. Biometrics 53:1354–1365

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White T (1993) Advanced-generation breeding populations: size and structure. In: Resolving tropical forest resource concerns through tree improvement, gene conservation and domestication of new species. In: Proc IUFRO Conference S2.02-08, Breeding tropical trees, 9–18 October 1992, Cartegena and Cali, Columbia, pp 208–221

  • Williams CG, Hamrick JL (1996) Elite populations for conifer breeding and gene conservation. Can J For Res 26:453–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams CG, Savolainen O (1996) Inbreeding depression in conifers: implications for breeding strategy. For Sci 42:102–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams CG, Hamrick JL, Lewis PO (1995) Multiple-population versus hierarchical conifer breeding programs: a comparison of genetic diversity levels. Theor Appl Genet 90:584–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray NR, Hill WG (1989) Asymptotic rates of response from index selection. Anim Prod 49:217–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1921) Systems of mating. Genetics 6:111–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1969) Evolution and the genetics of populations. Vol. 2, The theory of gene frequencies. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois

  • Wu HX, Matheson AC, Spencer D (1998a) Inbreeding in radiata pine. I. Effect of inbreeding on survival, growth and variance. Theor Appl Genet 97:1256–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu HX, Matheson AC, Spencer D (1998b) Inbreeding in Pinus radiata. II. Time course of inbreeding depression and effect on growth curve. NZJ For Sci 28:123–139

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out when the authors were visiting scientists at the Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, SLU, Umeå, Sweden. We gratefully acknowledge support received from the Jacob Wallenberg Foundation and Föreningen Skogsträdsförädling. We also thank Dr. Dag Lindgren, Dr. Hossein Jorjani, Dr. Bailian Li, and one anonymous reviewer, for valuable and constructive contributions to the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Forestry Research Institute of Sweden (SkogForsk) , Box 3, Sävar, 918 21, Sweden

    O. Rosvall

  2. Department of Forestry, North Carolina State University, Box 8002, Raleigh , NC 27695-8002, USA

    T. J. Mullin

Authors
  1. O. Rosvall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. J. Mullin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Rosvall.

Additional information

Communicated by O. Savolainen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosvall, O., Mullin, T.J. Positive assortative mating with selection restrictions on group coancestry enhances gain while conserving genetic diversity in long-term forest tree breeding. Theor Appl Genet 107, 629–642 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1318-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1318-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation