Skip to main content
Log in

Behandlung des Harnblasenkarzinoms im Alter

Treatment of bladder cancer in the elderly

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Das Harnblasenkarzinom ist in Deutschland beim Mann die vierthäufigste Krebserkrankung, bei der Frau liegt es an 14. Stelle. Drei Viertel der Erkrankungen treten jenseits des 65. Lebensjahres auf.

Thema

Betagte Patienten mit einem nicht-muskelinvasiven Harnblasenkarzinom scheinen ein höheres Rezidiv- und Progressionsrisiko zu haben und sollten ebenso sorgfältig behandelt und überwacht werden wie jüngere Patienten. Ältere Patienten mit muskelinvasivem Harnblasenkarzinom haben im Falle einer radikalen Zystektomie ein erhöhtes perioperatives Morbiditäts- und Mortalitätsrisiko. Sie sollten in erfahrenen Zentren betreut werden.

Schlussfolgerung

Neben der radikalen Zystektomie als Standardtherapie des muskelinvasiven Harnblasenkarzinoms kommen auch blasenerhaltende Verfahren (transurethrale Resektion, Chemotherapie, Strahlentherapie, Radiochemotherapie) zum Einsatz, die in sorgfältig ausgewählten Fällen eine Therapiealternative sein können. Aussagefähige randomisierte Vergleiche fehlen jedoch bisher.

Abstract

Background

In Germany, bladder cancer is the fourth most common malignancy in males, while it occupies the 14th place in females. About 75 % of cases occur in patients aged 65 or more years.

Objectives

Elderly patients with nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer appear to harbor a higher risk of disease recurrence and progression and should undergo the same treatment and careful surveillance as their younger counterparts. Elderly patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy are at an increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality and should be referred to experienced high-volume centers.

Conclusion

Beside radical cystectomy as standard treatment, several bladder-sparing approaches (transurethral resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy) are available which may be treatment alternatives in carefully selected cases. Valid randomized comparisons between these approaches and radical cystectomy are, however, still lacking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. RKI (2013) Robert Koch-Institut und Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland e. V.: Krebs in Deutschland 2009/2010, 9. Aufl. http://www.rki.de. Zugegriffen: 21. Dez. 2014

  2. Froehner M, Brausi MA, Herr HW et al (2009) Complications following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the elderly. Eur Urol 56:443–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Babjuk M, Böhle A, Burger M et al (2014) Guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (Ta, T1 and CIS). http://www.uroweb.org. Zugegriffen: 21. Dez. 2014

  4. Fernandez-Gomez J, Madero R, Solsona E et al (2009) Predicting nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer recurrence and progression in patients treated with bacillus Calmette-Guerin: the CUETO scoring model. J Urol 182:2195–2203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sylvester RJ, Meijden AP van der, Oosterlinck W et al (2006) Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol 49:466–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oddens JR, Sylvester RJ, Brausi MA et al (2014) The effect of age on the efficacy of maintenance bacillus Calmette-Guérin relative to maintenance epirubicin in patients with stage Ta T1 urothelial bladder cancer: results from EORTC genito-urinary group study 30911. Eur Urol 66:694–701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Witjes JA, Compérat E, Cowan NC et al (2014) EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. http://www.uroweb.org. Zugegriffen: 21. Dez. 2014

  8. Solsona E, Iborra I, Collado A et al (2010) Feasibility of radical transurethral resection as monotherapy for selected patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. J Urol 184:475–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sternberg CN, Pansadoro V, Calabrò F et al (2003) Can patient selection for bladder preservation be based on response to chemotherapy? Cancer 97:1644–1652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. James ND, Hussain SA, Hall E et al (2012) Radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. N Engl J Med 366:1477–1488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goossens-Laan CA, Leliveld AM, Verhoeven RH et al (2014) Effects of age and comorbidity on treatment and survival of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Int J Cancer 135:905–912

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Coen JJ, Paly JJ, Niemierko A et al (2013) Nomograms predicting response to therapy and outcomes after bladder-preserving trimodality therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 86:311–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mitin T, Hunt D, Shipley WU et al (2013) Transurethral surgery and twice-daily radiation plus paclitaxel-cisplatin or fluorouracil-cisplatin with selective bladder preservation and adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (RTOG 0233): a randomised multicentre phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:863–872

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goossens-Laan CA, Gooiker GA, Gijn W van et al (2011) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between hospital/surgeon volume and outcome for radical cystectomy: an update for the ongoing debate. Eur Urol 59:775–783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aziz A, May M, Burger M et al (2014) Prediction of 90-day mortality after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in a prospective European multicenter cohort. Eur Urol 66:156–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Donat SM, Siegrist T, Cronin A et al (2010) Radical cystectomy in octogenarians – does morbidity outweigh the potential survival benefits? J Urol 183:2171–2177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schiffmann J, Gandaglia G, Larcher A et al (2014) Contemporary 90-day mortality rates after radical cystectomy in the elderly. Eur J Surg Oncol 40:1738–1745

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis 40:373–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. American Society of Anesthesiologists (2014) ASA physical status classification system. ASA, Park Ridge. http://www.asahq.org. Zugegriffen: 21. Dez. 2014

  20. Novotny V, Wirth MP, Froehner M (2014) Re: Atiqullah Aziz, Matthias May, Maximilian Burger, et al. PROMETRICS 2011 research group. Prediction of 90-day mortality after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in a prospective European multicenter cohort. Eur Urol 2014;66:156–163. Eur Urol 66:13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J (1994) Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 47:1245–1251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kessler TM, Burkhard FC, Perimenis P et al (2004) Attempted nerve sparing surgery and age have a significant effect on urinary continence and erectile function after radical cystoprostatectomy and ileal orthotopic bladder substitution. J Urol 172:1323–1327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Palapattu GS et al (2006) Outcomes of radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a contemporary series from the Bladder Cancer Research Consortium. J Urol 176:2414–2422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maase H von der, Sengelov L, Roberts JT et al (2005) Long-term survival results of a randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus cisplatin, with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin in patients with bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:4602–4608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Galsky MD, Krege S, Lin CC et al (2014) Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy in septuagenarians with metastatic urothelial cancer. Urol Oncol 32:30.15–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hurria A, Togawa K, Mohile SG et al (2011) Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 29:3457–3465

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Danksagung

Die Autoren danken Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rainer Koch (em.), Radebeul, für die statistischen Analysen.

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. M. Fröhner und H. Rübben geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Fröhner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fröhner, M., Rübben, H. Behandlung des Harnblasenkarzinoms im Alter. Urologe 54, 510–515 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-015-3777-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-015-3777-4

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation