Zusammenfassung
Plastisch-rekonstruktive Eingriffe nehmen in der Urologie zu. Die Verwendung des optimalen Materials, d. h. z. B. freier Hautlappen oder gestielter Muskellappen, ist hierbei für den einzelnen Eingriff von entscheidender Bedeutung. Vorgestellt werden Technik, Indikationen sowie Grenzfelder und Innovationen zu und in anderen operativen Disziplinen.
Abstract
Plastic reconstructive surgery is of increasing importance in urology. The choice of the optimal material, for example dermal graft or musculocutaneous graft, is decisive for the operative success of each procedure. We present the technique, indications, innovations, and mutual fields with other operative disciplines.
Literatur
Aslan G, Sarifakioglu N, Tuncali D, Terzioglu A, Bingul F (2004) The prepuce and circumcision: dual application as a graft. Ann Plast Surg 53: 199–203
Hendren H, Keating M (1988) Use of dermal graft and free urethral graft in penile reconstruction. J Urol 140: 1265–1269
Turkaslan T, Dayicioglu D, Ozsoy Z (2004) An easy method for defatting large full-thickness grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 114: 275–276
Bradley C, Morgan M, Arya L, Rovner E (2003) Vaginal erosion after pubovaginal sling procedures using dermal allografts. J Urol 169: 286–287
Quek M, Ginsberg D, Wilson S, Skinner E, Stein J, Skinner D (2004) Pubovaginal slings for stress urinary incontinence following radical cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder reconstruction in women. J Urol 172: 219–221
Chaikin D, Rosenthal J, Blaivas J (1998) Pubovaginal facial sling for all types of stress urinary incontinence: long-term analysis. J Urol 160: 1312–1316
Carr L, Webster G (1996) Full-thickness cutaneous martius flaps: a useful technique in female reconstructive urology. Urology 48: 461–463
Haferkamp A, Wagener N, Buse S, Reitz A, Pfitzenmaier J, Hallscheidt P, Hohenfellner M (2005) Vesikovaginale Fisteln. Urologe A 44: 270–276
Hallberg H, Holmström H (2003) Vaginal reconstruction with skin grafts and vacuum-assisted closure. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 37: 97–101
Tosun Z, Hosnutter M, Savaci N, Capar M, Sentürk S (2004) Experience with vaginoplasty. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 38: 27–31
Krege S, Rübben H (2005) Rekonstruktion des äußeren weiblichen Genitale. Urologe (in press)
Tunuguntla H: Management of Peyronie’s Disease — a review. World J Urol 19: 244–250
Backhaus B, Müller S, Albers P (2003) Corporoplasty for advanced Peyronie’s Disease using venous and/or dermis patch grafting: new surgical technique and long-term patient satisfaction. J Urol 169: 981–984
Chun J, McGregor A, Krishnan R, Carson C (2001) A comparison of dermal and cadaveric pericardial grafts in the modified Horton-Devine procedure for Peyronie’s Disease. J Urol 166: 185–188
Leungwattanakij S, Bivalacacqua T, Yang D, Hyun, Hellstrom W (2003) Comparison of cadaveric pericardial, dermal, vein, and synthetic grafts for tunica albuginea substitution using a rat model. BJU 92: 119–124
Grein U, Schreiter F (1996) Kavernöse Insuffizienz nach Dermalgraft-Corporoplastik. Urologe A 35: 11–13
Christakis C, Vaklavas C, Kontos N, Chatzidimitriou C, Tzelepi K, Karanikas M, Christakis E (2004) Pelvic reconstruction of the retroperitoneum after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum using full-thickness skin grafts. Tech Coloproctol 8: 85–88
Howdieshell,T, Proctor C, Sternberg E, Cue J, Mondy J, Hawkins M (2004) Temporary abdominal closure followed by definitive abdominal wall reconstruction of the open abdomen. Am J Surg 188: 301–306
Jernigan T, Fabian T, Croce M, Moore N, Pritchard F, Minard G, Bee T (2003) Staged management of giant abdominal wall defects. Ann Surg 238: 349–357
Tuncali D, Bingul F, Talim B, Surucu S, Sahin F, Aslan G (2005) Histologic characteristics of the human prepuce pertaining to its clinical behaviour as a dual graft. Ann Plast Surg 54: 191–195
Interessenkonflikt:
Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sperling, H., Lümmen, G., Krege, S. et al. Nutzung freier Hauttransplantate in der Urologie. Urologe 44, 751–755 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-005-0846-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-005-0846-0