Zusammenfassung
Für die Durchführung einer radikalen Prostatektomie zur Therapie des lokalisierten Prostatakarzinoms stehen mit dem offenen retropubischen, der perinealen sowie der laparoskopischen Zugang verschiedene operative Techniken zur Verfügung. Die postoperative Lebensqualität der Patienten wird neben der Tumorkontrolle maßgeblich durch die postoperativen Kontinenz- und Potenzraten bestimmt. In dieser Arbeit werden die Ergebnisse der eigenen Klinik sowie die in der Literatur publizierten Daten zu den einzelnen Operationsverfahren gegenübergestellt.
Abstract
Radical prostatectomy for the treatment of prostate cancer can be performed by various techniques using a retropubic, perineal, or laparoscopic approach. Besides tumor control, the postoperative urinary continence rates and potency rates impact patients' quality of life after radical prostatectomy. This paper shows the results of our own center and compares the data in the literature regarding functional results of radical prostatectomy with respect to various operative techniques.
Literatur
Seitmann H, Mushinski MH, Silverberg F (1995) Probabilities of eventually developing or dying of cancer-United States 1995. Cancer 35: 36
Albertsen PC, Hanley JA, Gleason DF, Barry MJ (1998) Competing risk analysis of men aged 55 to 74 years at diagnosis managed conservatively for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 280: 975–980
Lepor H, Nieder AM, Ferrandino MN (2001) Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1,000 cases. J Urol 166: 1729–1733
Ruiz-Deya G, Davis R, Srivastav SK, Wise A, Thomas R (2001) Outpatient radical prostatectomy: impact of standard perineal approach on outcome. J Urol 166: 581–586
Lance RS, Freidrichs PA, Powell CR et al. (2001) Comparison of radical retropubic with perineal prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer within the Uniformed Services Urology Research Group. BJU-Int 87: 61–65
Augustin H, Hammerer P, Graefen M, Palisaar J, Noldus J, Fernandez S, Huland H (2003) Intraoperative and perioperative morbidity of contemporary radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1243 patients: results of a single center between 1999 and 2002. Eur Urol 43: 113–118
Turk I, Deger IS, Winkelmann B, Roigas J, Schonberger B, Loening SA (2001) Die laparoskopische radikale Prostatektomie. Erfahrungen mit 145 Eingriffen. Urologe A 40: 199–206
Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2003) Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology 60: 864–868
Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Doublet JD, Baumert H, Vallancien G (2002) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 43: 123–133
Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Borkowski T et al. (2003) Assessment of surgical technique and perioperative morbidity associated with extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 61: 617–622
Khan MA, Han M, Partin AW, Epstein JI, Walsh PC (2003) Long-term cancer control of radical prostatectomy in men younger than 50 years of age. Urology 62: 86–91
Walsh PC (2000) Radikal prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer provides durable cancer control with excellent quality of life: a structurated debate. J Urol 163: 1802–1807
Iselin CE, Robertson JE, Paulson DF (1999) Radical perineal prostatectomy: Oncological outcome during a 20-year period. J Urol 161: 163–168
Hoznek A, Samadi DB, Salomon L, De-La-Taille A, Olsson LE, Abbou CC (2002) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: published series. Curr Urol Rep 3: 152–158
Salomon L, Levrel O, Anastasiadis AG et al. (2002) Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 5: 285–290
Goluboff ET, Saidi JA, Mazer S, Bagiella E, Heitjan DF, Benson MC, Olsson CA (1998) Urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: the Columbia experience. J Urol 159: 1276–1280
Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Rogers E, Goad JR, Ohori M, Boone TM, Scardino PT (1996) Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 156: 1707–1713
Michl U, Graefen M, Haese A, Hammerer P, Huland H (2001) Prospective analysis of continence and micturition following nerve sparing and non nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Significant impact of the nerve sparing procedure on continence. J Urol 165 [Suppl]
Kao TC, Cruess DF, Garner D et al. (2000) Multicenter patient self reporting questionnaire on impotence, incontinence and stricture after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 163: 858
Stanford JL, Feng Z, Hamilton AS et al. (2000) Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. JAMA 283: 354–360
Wei TJ, Dunn RL, Marcovich R, Montie JE, Sanda MG (2000) Prospective assessment of patient reported urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 164: 744–748
Catalona WJ, Carvalhal GF, Mager DE, Smith DS (1999) Potency, continence and complication rates in 1870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 162: 433–438
Bishoff JT, Motley G, Optenberg SA et al. (1998) Incidence of fecal and urinary incontinence following radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy in a national population. J Urol 160: 454–458
Dahm P, Silverstein AD, Weizer AZ, Young MD, Vieweg J, Albala DM, Paulson DF (2003) A longitudinal assessment of bowel related symptoms and fecal incontinence following radical perineal prostatectomy. J Urol 169: 2220–2224
Weldon VE, Tavel FR, Neuwirth HJ (1997) Continence, potency and morbidity after radical perineal prostatectomy. J Urol 158: 1470–1475
Frazier HA, Robertson JE, Paulson DF (1992) Radical prostatectomy: The pros and cons of the perineal versus retropubic approach. J Urol 147: 888–890
Gray M, Petroni GR, Theodorescu D (1999) Urinary function after radical prostatectomy: a comparison of the retropubic and perineal approaches. Urology 53: 881–890
Olsson LE, Salomon L, Nadu A, Hoznek A, Cicco A, Saint F, Chopin D, Abbou CC (2001) Prospective patient-reported continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 58: 570–572
Salomon L, Anastasiadis AG, Katz R (2002) Urinary continence and erectile function: a prospective evaluation of functional results after radical laparoscopic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 42: 338–343
Stolzenburg JU, Do M, Rabenalt R, Pfeiffer H, Horn L, Truss MC, Jonas U, Dorschner W (2003) Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: initial experience after 70 procedures. J Urol 169: 2066–2071
Roumeguere T, Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M et al. (2003) Radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of oncological and functional results between open and laparoscopic approaches. World J Urol 20: 360–366
Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Schulze M, Teber D, Hatzinger M, Frede T (2003) Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 169: 1689–1693
Noldus J, Michl U, Graefen M et al. (2002) Patient-reported sexual function after nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 42: 118–124
Jakse G, Brehmer B, Borchers H, Verger-Kuhnke A, Biesterfeld S (2003) Nerverhaltende perineale Prostatektomie. Urologe A 42: 382–386
Katz R, Salomon L, Hoznek A, Taille A, Vordos D, Cicco A, Chopin D, Abbou CC (2003) Patient reported sexual function following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 168: 2078–2082
Potosky AL, Legler J, Albertson PC, Stanford JL, Gililand FD, Hamilton AS, Eley JW, Stephenson RA, Harlan LC (2000) Health out comes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Nat Canc Inst 92: 1582–1592
Wei T, Dunn RL, Sandler HM, McLaughlin PU, Montie JE, Litwin MS, Nyquist L, Sanda MG (2002) Comprehensive comparison of health related quality of life after contemporary therapie for localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 20: 557–566
Hara I, Kawabata G, Miyake H, Nakamura I, Hara S, Okada H, Kamidono S (2003) Comparison of quality of life following laparoscopic and open prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 169: 2045–2048
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Michl, U., Graefen, M., Noldus, J. et al. Funktionelle Ergebnisse unterschiedlicher Operationstechniken der radikalen Prostatektomie. Urologe [A] 42, 1196–1202 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-003-0431-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-003-0431-3