Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intraoperative Magnetresonanztomographie

Erfahrungen aus 15 Jahren Hybridoperationssaal in der Neurochirurgie

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging

Fifteen years’ experience in the neurosurgical hybrid operating suite

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Unfallchirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die intraoperative Magnetresonanztomographie wurde aufgrund von besonderen Anforderungen bei der Resektion von Gliomen des Gehirns vor 15 Jahren etabliert. Mehrere Untersuchungen konnten unabhängig von einander eine Zunahme des Resektionsausmaßes dieser Tumore und damit auch eine verbesserte Überlebensrate bei diesen Patienten zeigen. Durch technische Innovationen verbunden mit einer deutlichen Vereinfachung des Betriebes dieser bildgebenden Modalität fand die Methode v. a. in den letzten Jahren eine weite Verbreitung. Gleichzeitig wurden mit der Einführung der funktionellen und metabolischen Bildgebung neue Möglichkeiten zur Verbesserung des Behandlungsergebnisses eröffnet.

Abstract

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging was established 15 years ago due to special requirements for the resection of cerebral gliomas. Several studies have independently shown an increase of the extent of resection of the tumor and also an improved survival of the patients. Technical innovations combined with an easier operation of this imaging modality led to widespread implementation of this method. The introduction of functional and metabolic imaging opened up new prospects of further improving the therapeutic outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Literatur

  1. Albert FK, Forsting M, Sartor K et al (1994) Early postoperative magnetic resonance imaging after resection of malignant glioma: objective evaluation of residual tumor and its influence on regrowth and prognosis. Neurosurgery 34(1):45–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wirtz CR, Kunze S (1998) Neuronavigation: computerassistierte Neurochirurgie. Dtsch Arztebl A 95(39):2384

    Google Scholar 

  3. Black PM, Alexander EI, Martin C et al (1999) Craniotomy for tumor treatment in an intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging unit. Neurosurgery 45(3):423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tronnier VM, Wirtz CR, Knauth M et al (1997) Intraoperative diagnostic and interventional magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 40(5):891

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stadlbauer A, Nimsky C, Buslei R et al (2007) Diffusion tensor imaging and optimized fiber tracking in glioma patients: histopathologic evaluation of tumor-invaded white matter structures. Neuroimage 34(3):949–956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Merhof D et al (2006) Intraoperative visualization of the pyramidal tract by diffusion-tensor-imaging-based fiber tracking. Neuroimage 30(4):1219–1229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Knauth M, Wirtz CR, Tronnier VM et al (1999) Intraoperative MR imaging increases the extent of tumor resection in patients with high-grade gliomas. Am J Neuroradiol 20(9):1642–1646

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hall WA, Liu H, Martin AJ et al (2000) Safety, efficacy, and functionality of high-field strength interventional magnetic resonance imaging for neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 46(3):632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bernstein M, Al-Anazi AR, Kucharczyk W et al (2000) Brain tumor surgery with the Toronto open magnetic resonance imaging system: preliminary results for 36 patients and analysis of advantages, disadvantages, and future prospects. Neurosurgery 46(4):900

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wirtz CR, Knauth M, Staubert A et al (2000) Clinical evaluation and follow-up results for intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 46(5):1112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Black PM, Moriarty T, Alexander EI et al (1997) Development and implementation of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and its neurosurgical applications. Neurosurgery 41(4):831

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Senft C, Seifert V, Hermann E et al (2008) Usefulness Of intraoperative ultra low-field magnetic resonance imaging in glioma surgery. Neurosurgery 63:257–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Keller von B et al (2004) Intraoperative high-field-strength MR imaging: implementation and experience in 200 patients. Radiology 233(1):67–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nimsky C, Keller von B, Ganslandt O, Fahlbusch R (2006) Intraoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging in transsphenoidal surgery of hormonally inactive pituitary macroadenomas. Neurosurgery 59(1):105–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gerlach R, Mesnil de Rochemont du R, Gasser T et al (2008) Feasibility of Polestar N20, an ultra-low-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging system in resection control of pituitary macroadenomas: lessons learned from the first 40 cases. Neurosurgery 63(2):272–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Senft C, Bink A, Heckelmann M et al (2011) Glioma extent of resection and ultra-low-field iMRI: interim analysis of a prospective randomized trial. Acta Neurochir 109(Suppl):49–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahmadi R, Dictus C, Hartmann C et al (2009) Long-term outcome and survival of surgically treated supratentorial low-grade glioma in adult patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151(11):1359–1365

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schmidt T, König R, Hlavac M et al (2011) Lows and highs: 15 years of development in intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Neurochir 109(Suppl):17–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Knauth M, Aras N, Wirtz CR et al (1999) Surgically induced intracranial contrast enhancement: potential source of diagnostic error in intraoperative MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol 20(8):1547–1553

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wirtz C, Knauth M, Stamov M et al (2002) Clinical impact of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging on central nervous system neoplasia. Tech Neurosurg 7(4):326–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. König RW, Heinen CPG, Antoniadis G et al (2011) Image guided aneurysm surgery in a Brainsuite® ioMRI Miyabi 1.5 T environment. Acta Neurochir 109(Suppl):107–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Neurochirurgische Universitätsklinik Ulm, Steinhövelstraße 9, 89075, Ulm, Deutschland

    M. Hlavac, R. König, M. Halatsch &  C.R. Wirtz

Authors
  1. M. Hlavac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. König
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Halatsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C.R. Wirtz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C.R. Wirtz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hlavac, M., König, R., Halatsch, M. et al. Intraoperative Magnetresonanztomographie. Unfallchirurg 115, 121–124 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-011-2122-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-011-2122-7

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation