Skip to main content
Log in

Neue Wege zur Prävention des Typ-1-Diabetes bei Kindern

Chancen und Risiken

New ways for prevention of type 1 diabetes in children

Possibilities and risks

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Innerhalb des klinischen Phänotyps Typ-1-Diabetes besteht eine beträchtliche Heterogenität: Die genetische Anfälligkeit ist komplex, die Progressionsraten unterscheiden sich deutlich, ebenso wie die Wirksamkeit therapeutischer Maßnahmen. Neue Präventionsstrategien sollen mithilfe von Biomarkern zu personalisierten Kombinationstherapien in Analogie zum Vorgehen in der Kinderonkologie führen. Bekanntlich beginnt der Typ-1-Diabetes mit der Autoimmunität, dem Nachweis von 2 oder mehr persistierenden diabetesassoziierten Antikörpern (Stadium 1). Eine zusätzliche subklinische Dysglykämie wird als Stadium 2 bezeichnet, der manifeste Typ-1-Diabetes als Stadium 3. Sowohl genetische wie immunologische Parameter ermöglichen eine Früherkennung von Kindern und Jugendlichen. Da 9 von 10 betroffenen Kindern aus Familien ohne andere Familienmitglieder mit Typ-1-Diabetes stammen, sind bevölkerungsbezogene Screeningstrategien zur Prävention des Typ-1-Diabetes erforderlich. Untersuchungen zur psychologischen Belastung durch Screeningprozeduren zeigten, dass die große Mehrheit der Familien mit dem Wissen um das erhöhte Diabetesrisiko ihres Kindes nach kurzer Zeit relativ unbelastet leben konnte. Im Forschungsnetzwerk Globale Plattform zur Prävention des Autoimmunen Diabetes (GPPAD) werden Primärprävention mit oralem Insulin (POINT-Studie) oder Probiotika (S1NTIA-Studie) untersucht. Das europäische Forschungsnetzwerk „An innovative approach towards understanding and arresting Type 1 diabetes“ (INNODIA) entwickelt ein einheitliches Studienprotokoll („Masterprotokoll“), um ab dem Patientenalter von 5 Jahren die Untersuchung neuer Einzelsubstanzen und Kombinationstherapien zu beschleunigen. Sekundäre Präventionsansätze zeigen in ersten Pilotstudien vielversprechende Ergebnisse zu Verlängerung der Remissionsphase oder Verzögerung des Krankheitsbeginns bei Risikopopulationen.

Abstract

There is considerable heterogeneity within the clinical phenotype of type 1 diabetes: the genetic susceptibility is complex and progression rates markedly differ, as does the efficacy of therapeutic measures. New prevention strategies should use biomarkers to lead to personalized combination treatment analogous to the approach used in pediatric oncology. It is well known that type 1 diabetes starts with autoimmunity and the detection of two or more persistent diabetes-associated antibodies (stage 1). An additional subclinical dysglycemia is termed stage 2 and manifest type 1 diabetes is termed stage 3. Both genetic and immunological parameters enable early detection in children and adolescents. Because 9 out of 10 affected children come from families without other family members having type 1 diabetes, population-based screening strategies are needed for prevention of type 1 diabetes. Studies on the psychological burden of screening procedures showed that the vast majority of families were able to live relatively unburdened by the knowledge of their child’s increased diabetes risk after a short period of time. The Global Platform for Prevention of Autoimmune Diabetes (GPPAD) research network is investigating primary prevention with oral insulin (POInT study) or probiotics (S1NTIA study). The European research network “an innovative approach towards understanding and arresting type 1 diabetes” (INNODIA) is developing a standardized study protocol (master protocol) to accelerate the investigation of new single agents and combination therapies in patients over 5 years of age. Secondary prevention approaches are showing promising results in initial pilot studies to prolong the remission phase or delay disease onset in populations at risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. American Diabetes Association (2021) Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes—2021. Diabetes Care 44(Supplement 1):S15–S33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Assfalg R, Knoop J, Hoffman KL et al (2021) Oral insulin immunotherapy in children at risk for type 1 diabetes in a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia 64:1079–1092

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aye T, Mazaika PK, Mauras N et al (2019) Diabetes Research in Children Network (Direcnet) study group. Impact of early diabetic ketoacidosis on the developing brain. Diabetes Care 42:443–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonifacio E, Ziegler AG, Klingensmith G et al (2015) Effects of high-dose oral insulin on immune responses in children at high risk for type 1 diabetes: the Pre-POINT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 313:1541–1549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Craig ME, Kim KW, Isaacs SR et al (2019) Early-life factors contributing to type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 62:1823–1834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Danne T, Kordonouri O, Lange K (Hrsg) (2014) Diabetes bei Kindern und Jugendlichen, 7. Aufl. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fonolleda M, Murillo M, Vázquez F et al (2017) Remission phase in paediatric type 1 diabetes: new understanding and emerging biomarkers. Horm Res Paediatr 88:307–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghetti S, Kuppermann N, Rewers A et al (2020) Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) DKA FLUID study group. Cognitive function following diabetic ketoacidosis in children with new-onset or previously diagnosed type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 43:2768–2775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gubitosi-Klug RA, Braffett BH, Hitt S et al (2021) DCCT/EDIC research group. Residual β cell function in long-term type 1 diabetes associates with reduced incidence of hypoglycemia. J Clin Invest 131:e143011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Haller MJ, Long SA, Blanchfield JL et al (2019) Low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin preserves C‑peptide, reduces HbA1C, and increases regulatory to conventional T‑cell ratios in new-onset type 1 diabetes: two-year clinical trial data. Diabetes 68:1267–1276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Herold KC, Bundy BN, Lomg SA et al (2019) An anti-CD3 antibody, teplizumab, in relatives at risk for type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 381:603–613

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hommel A, Haupt F, Delivani P et al (2018) Screening for type 1 diabetes risk in newborns: the Freder1k pilot study in Saxony. Horm Metab Res 50:44–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ovalle F, Grimes T, Xu G et al (2018) Verapamil and beta cell function in adults with recent-onset type 1 diabetes. Nat Med 24:1108–1112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kahaly GJ, Stan MN, Frommer L et al (2020) A novel anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody, iscalimab, for control of graves hyperthyroidism‑A proof-of-concept trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105:dgz13. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgz013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lange K (2018) Früherkennungsuntersuchungen zum Typ-1-Diabetes aus psychologischer Sicht. Diabetologe 14:250–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mortensen HB, Hougaard P, Swift P et al (2009) New definition for the partial remission period in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 32:1384–1390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Neu A, Bürger-Büsing J, Danne T et al (2019) Diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 127(S 01):S39–S72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Patterson CC, Harjutsalo V, Rosenbauer J et al (2019) Trends and cyclical variation in the incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes in 26 European centres in the 25 year period 1989–2013: a multicentre prospective registration study. Diabetologia 62:408–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Quattrin T, Haller MJ, Steck AK et al (2020) Golimumab and beta-cell function in youth with new-onset type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 383:2007–2017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Raab J, Haupt F, Scholz M et al (2016) Capillary blood islet autoantibody screening for identifying pre-type 1 diabetes in the general population: design and initial results of the Fr1da study. BMJ Open 6(5):e11144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rewers M, Gottlieb P (2009) Immunotherapy for the prevention and treatment of type 1 diabetes: human trials and a look into the future. Diabetes Care 32:1769–1782

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Richardson SR, Morgan NG (2018) Enteroviral infections in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes: new insights for therapeutic intervention. Curr Opin Pharmacol 43:11–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Russell JT, Roesch LFW, Ördberg M et al (2019) Genetic risk for autoimmunity is associated with distinct changes in the human gut microbiome. Nat Commun 10:3621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Skyler JS, Bakris GL, Bonifacio E et al (2017) Differentiation of diabetes by pathophysiology, natural history, and prognosis. Diabetes 66:241–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tang R, Zhong T, Wu C et al (2019) The remission phase in type 1 diabetes: role of hyperglycemia rectification in immune modulation. Front Endocrinol 10:824–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vatanen T, Franzosa EA, Schwager R et al (2018) The human gut microbiome in early-onset type 1 diabetes from the TEDDY study. Nature 562:589–594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Winkler C, Schober E, Ziegler AG et al (2012) Markedly reduced rate of diabetic ketoacidosis at onset of type 1 diabetes in relatives screened for islet autoantibodies. Pediatr Diabetes 13:308–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ziegler AG, Arnolds S, Kölln A et al (2021) Supplementation with Bifidobacteria longum subspecies infantis EVC001 for mitigation of type 1 diabetes autoimmunity – the GPPAD-SINT1A study protocol. BMJ Open : (in press)

  29. Ziegler AG, Danne T, Dunger DB et al (2016) Primary prevention of beta-cell autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes – the Global Platform for the Prevention of Autoimmune Diabetes (GPPAD) perspectives. Mol Metab 5:255–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ziegler AG, Kick K, Bonifacio E et al (2020) Yield of a public health screening of children for islet autoantibodies in Bavaria, Germany. JAMA 323:339–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Kordonouri.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

O. Kordonouri, T. Danne und K. Lange geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

Redaktion

G. Hansen, Hannover

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kordonouri, O., Danne, T. & Lange, K. Neue Wege zur Prävention des Typ-1-Diabetes bei Kindern. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 169, 930–940 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00112-021-01274-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00112-021-01274-x

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation