Skip to main content
Log in

Rekonstruktion im Oropharynx

Geeignete freie und gestielte Transplantate

Oropharynx reconstruction

Use of free and pedicled flaps

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
HNO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die chirurgische Behandlung von ausgedehnten Karzinomen im Oropharynx lässt einen primären Wundverschluss meistens nicht zu und führt bei Resektionen vor allem im Bereich des Zungengrundes, des weichen Gaumens und der seitlichen Pharynxwand primär häufig zu Störungen der Schluckfunktion und des Stimmklangs, was eine massive Beeinträchtigung der Lebensqualität zur Folge hat. Auch sekundäre Vernarbungen können zum Beispiel zu einer Fixierung der Zunge sowie zu einer Einengung des Pharynx führen. Daher sind rekonstruktive Maßnahmen v. a. mit freien aber auch gestielten Transplantaten besonders wichtig, um funktionelle Beeinträchtigungen zu verringern. Auch nach Traumen oder bei Fehlbildungen sind in seltenen Fällen Rekonstruktionen notwendig.

Abstract

Oropharyngeal cancer surgery often does not allow primary wound closure; furthermore, surgery of tumors in the base of the tongue, the soft palate and the lateral pharyngeal wall often lead to swallowing disorders and nasal twang which severely impair quality of life. Secondary scarring may also result in fixation of the tongue or stenosis of the pharynx. Therefor reconstructive techniques with free or pedicled flaps are essential to reduce functional impairment. In addition, after trauma or due to malformations, reconstructive surgery using flap techniques is sometimes indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Logemann JA, Rademaker AW, Pauloski BR et al (1998) Normal swallowing physiology as viewed by videofluoroscopy and videoendoscopy. Folia Phoniatr Logop 50:311–319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Logemann JA, Pauloski BR, Rademaker AW et al (1993) Speech and swallow function after tonsil/base of tongue resection with primary closure. J Speech Hear Res 36:918–926

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Borggreven PA, Verdonck-de Leeuw I, Rinkel RN et al (2007) Swallowing after major surgery of the oral cavity or oropharynx: a prospective and longitudinal assessment of patients treated by microvascular soft tissue reconstruction. Head Neck 29:638–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Seikaly H, Rieger J, Zalmanowitz J et al (2008) Functional soft palate reconstruction: a comprehensive surgical approach. Head Neck 30:1615–1623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Curtis TA, Beumer J (1979) Speech, palatopharyngeal function and restoration of soft palate defects. Maxillofac Rehabil Prosthodont Surg Consid 244

  6. Logemann JA, Pauloski BR, Rademaker AW, Colangelo LA (1997) Speech and swallowing rehabilitation for head and neck cancer patients. Oncology (Williston Park) 11:651–656, 659 (discussion 659, 663–654)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Urken ML, Buchbinder D, Costantino PD et al (1998) Oromandibular reconstruction using microvascular composite flaps: report of 210 cases. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124:46–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ariyan S (1979) The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. A versatile flap for reconstruction in the head and neck. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:73–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Olivari N (1976) The latissimus flap. Br J Plast Surg 29:126–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang G, Chen B, Gao Y et al (1981) Forearm free skin flap transplantation. Natl Med J China 61:139

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mühlbauer W, Herndl E, Stock W (1982) The forearm flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 70:336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bootz F, Biesinger E (1991) Reduction of complication rate at radial forearm flap donor sites. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 53:160–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Soutar DS, Scheker LR, Tanner NS, McGregor IA (1983) The radial forearm flap: a versatile method for intra-oral reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 36:1–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bootz F, Muller GH (1988) Microvascular tissue transplantation of the ear, nose and throat. HNO 36:456–461

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bootz F, Muller GH (1989) Radial forearm flap. Its versatile application in plastic surgery reconstruction of the head and neck. Laryngorhinootologie 68:595–601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Reuther JF, Steinau HU, Wagner R (1984) Reconstruction of large defects in the oropharynx with a revascularized intestinal graft: an experimental and clinical report. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:345–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bootz F (1988) The free forearm flap in covering defects of the pharynx and oral cavity. HNO 36:462–466

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bootz F, Becker D, Fliesek J (1993) Functional results and survival probability of tumor patients after reconstruction of the mouth cavity and oropharynx using a microvascular radial forearm flap. HNO 41:380–384

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brown JS, Rogers SN, Lowe D (2006) A comparison of tongue and soft palate squamous cell carcinoma treated by primary surgery in terms of survival and quality of life outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:208–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Baumann I, Greschniok A, Bootz F, Kaiserling E (1996) Free transplanted, microvascular reanastomosed forearm flap for reconstruction of the mouth cavity and oropharynx. Clinical and morphologic findings with special reference to reinnervation. HNO 44:616–623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hidalgo DA, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Hu QY (1998) A review of 716 consecutive free flaps for oncologic surgical defects: refinement in donor-site selection and technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:722–732 (discussion 733–724)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Katsaros J, Schusterman M, Beppu M et al (1984) The lateral upper arm flap: anatomy and clinical applications. Ann Plast Surg 12:489–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Fukuda H et al (1991) Free, thinned, paraumbilical perforator-based flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 7:313–316

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Monstrey S, Landuyt K van, Blondeel P et al (1996) Gluteal thigh flap used as a fascio-cutaneous free flap. Microsurgery 17:386–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N et al (2002) Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2219–2226 (discussion 2227–2230)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Koshima I, Fukuda H, Yamamoto H et al (1993) Free anterolateral thigh flaps for reconstruction of head and neck defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:421–428 (discussion 429–430)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seinen Koautor an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Herberhold.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herberhold, S., Bootz, F. Rekonstruktion im Oropharynx . HNO 61, 580–585 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-013-2703-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-013-2703-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation