Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Der transversale Rectus-abdominis-Muskel- (TRAM-)Lappen

„Second defensive line“ zur mikrovaskulären Rekonstruktion von Defekten im Kopf-Hals-Bereich

The transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) island flap as a second defensive line in microvascular reconstructions of defects in the head and neck area

  • Kasuistiken
  • Published:
HNO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Der mikrovaskulär anastomosierte transversale Rectus-abdominis-Muskel- (TRAM-)Lappen wird seit über 10 Jahren von Allgemein- und plastischen Chirurgen erfolgreich zur Rekonstruktion und Augmentation in der Mammachirurgie eingesetzt. In der rekonstruktiven Kopf-Hals-Chirurgie ist dieser Lappen nur wenig bekannt.

Methodik

Wir haben an 8 Leichen Präparation und anatomische Varianten des TRAM untersucht. An einem klinischen Fall mit kompletter Rekonstruktion der äußeren Nase nach Ablatio nasi und Totalverlust eines zuvor transplantierten radialen Unterarmlappens bei Tumorrezidiv werden Lappenformung und -modellierung des TRAM demonstriert.

Ergebnisse

Das relativ große Gefäßkaliber sowie der einfache primäre Hebedefektverschluss machen den TRAM zur Reserve für Defektverschlüsse im Kopf-Hals-Bereich. Nach Ausdünnung des subkutanen Fettgewebes kann er gut modelliert werden und wurde zum Defektverschluss nach Ablation von Nase/Mittelgesicht eingesetzt.

Fazit

Bei Berücksichtigung entsprechender chirurgischer Kautelen ist die Gefahr einer iatrogenen Eröffnung des Peritoneum oder einer Hernia abdominalis als gering anzusehen. Als myokutaner und somit voluminöser Lappen kann der TRAM aber den fasziokutanen radialen Unterarmlappen nicht ersetzen. Bei ungünstigen Wundverhältnissen im Empfängergebiet ist er für den Kopf-Hals-Chirurgen jedoch eine Alternative.

Abstract

Background

The microvascular anastomosed transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) island flap has been successfully used in plastic surgery for more than 10 years. In reconstructive head and neck surgery, however, it is not yet established.

Method

We analysed the preparation and anatomical variation in TRAM flaps in an examination of eight cadavers. In a clinical case with complete reconstruction of the nose after nasal ablation and complete loss of a radial lower forearm flap that had been transplanted previously due to a recurrent tumor, the possibility of forming and modeling a TRAM flap is demonstrated.

Results

The flap vessels of the TRAM are comparable to the radial forearm flap, and the donor site may be primarily closed. The TRAM proved to be a suitable alternative to close lesions of the head and neck area in selected cases. The myocutaneous TRAM is bulkier than the fascio-cutaneous radial forearm flap. The subcutaneous abdominal fat of the TRAM can be reduced in relation to the vascular distribution of the perforator vessels. If the subcutaneous fat of the flap is reduced, the flap can be shaped and formed well. In the described case, it was used to close the lesion after ablation of the nose and middle face.

Conclusion

The risk of an iatrogenic lesion of the peritoneal fascia or postsurgical herniation of the abdominal wall is low if several surgical prerequisites are taken into consideration. The myocutaneous TRAM will not replace the fascio-cutaneous radial forearm flap in microvascular head and neck surgery, but the large diameter of the donor vessels and the highly vascularized flap tissue makes it an alternative as a second line procedure in cases of unfavorable wound conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Allen RJ, Treece P (1994) Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 32: 32–38

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnez ZM, Bajec J, Bardsley AF, Scamp T, Webster MHC (1991) Experience with 50 free TRAM flap breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 87: 470–478

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baldwin BJ, Schusterman MA, Miller MJ, Kroll SS, Wang BG (1994) Bilateral breast reconstruction: conventional versus free TRAM. Plast Reconstr Surg 93: 1410–1416

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baumann I, Greschniok A, Bootz F, Kaiserling E (1996) Free transplanted, microvascular reanastomosed forearm flap for reconstruction of the mouth cavity and oropharynx. Clinical and morphologic findings with special reference to reinnervation. HNO 44(11): 616–623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bootz F (1988) The free forearm flap in covering defects of the pharynx and oral cavity. HNO 36(11): 462–466

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bootz F, Becker D, Fliesek J (1993) Functional results and survival probability of tumor patients after reconstruction of the mouth cavity and oropharynx using a microvascular radial forearm flap. HNO 41(8): 380–384

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boyd JB, Taylor I, Corlett R (1984) The vascular territories of the superior epigastric and the deep inferior epigastric systems. Plast Reconstr Surg 73: 1–14

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Edsander-Nord A, Jurell G, Wickman M (1998) Donor-site morbidity after pedicled or free TRAM flap surgery: a prospective and objective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 102: 1508–1516

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Erni D, Harder YD (2003) The dissection of the rectus abdominis myocutaneus flap with complete preservation of the anterior sheath. Br J Plast Surg 56: 395–400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Evans HB, Lampe HB (1987) The radial forearm flap in head and neck reconstruction. J Otolaryngol 16(6): 382–386

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Galli A, Adami M, Berrino P, Leone S, Santi P (1992) Long-term evaluation of the abdominal wall competence after total and selective harvesting of the rectus abdominis muscle. Ann Plast Surg 28: 409–413

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hartrampf CR, Scheflan M, Black PW (1982) Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 69: 216–225

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Holmström H (1979) The free abdominoplasty flap and its use in breast reconstruction. An experimental study and clinical case report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 13: 423–427

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Horch RE, Stark GB (1999) The rectus abdominis free flap as an emergency procedure in extensive upper extremity soft tissue defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 103: 1421–1427

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Horch RE, Stark GB (1994) Prosthetic vascular graft infection — defect covering with delayed vertical rectus abdominis muscular flap (VRAM) and rectus femoris flap. VASA 23: 52–56

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Horch RE, Gitsch G, Schultze-Seemann W (2002) The use of the pedicled myocutaneous VRAM (vertical rectus abdominis muscular) flaps to close pouch-vaginal and vesico-vaginal fistulae with simultaneous and perineal reconstruction in irradiated pelvic wounds. Urology 60 (3): 502–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kroll SS (2000) Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 106: 576–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kroll SS, Marchi M (1992) Comparison of strategies for preventing abdominal-wall weakness after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89: 1045–1051

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP (1995) Abdominal wall strength, bulging, and hernia after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 96: 616–619

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moon HK, Taylor GI (1988) The vascular anatomy of the rectus abdominis musculocutaneus flap based on the deep superior epigastric system. Plast Surg Reconstr Surg 82: 815–829

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Scheflan MD, Dinner MI (1983) Transverse abdominis island flap: indications, contraindications, results and complications. Ann Plast Surg 10: 24–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Scheflan MD, Dinner MI (1983) Transverse abdominal island flap — Surgical technique. Ann Plast Surg 10: 120–129

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schusterman MA, Kroll SS, Miller MJ et al. (1994) The free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: one center’s experience with 211 consecutive cases. Ann Plast Surg 32: 234–241

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor GI, Cortlett RJ, Boyd JB (1984) The versatile deep inferior epigastric (inferior rectus abdominis) flap. Br J Plast Surg 37: 330–350

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Taylor GI, Palmer JH (1987) The vascular territorries (angiosomes) of the body: experimental study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg 40: 113–141

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. UICC (International Union Against Cancer) (1997) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 5th edn. J Wiley & Sons, New York

Download references

Interessenkonflikt:

Keine Angaben

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Schipper.

Additional information

Dieser Beitrag wurde auszugsweise anlässlich der 34. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Plastischen Chirurgen sowie der 8. Jahrestagung der Vereinigung der Deutschen Ästhetisch-Plastischen Chirurgen, 30.09.–05.10.2003, Freiburg vorgetragen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schipper, J., Klenzner, T., Arapakis, I. et al. Der transversale Rectus-abdominis-Muskel- (TRAM-)Lappen. HNO 54, 20–24 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-005-1286-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-005-1286-2

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation