Skip to main content
Log in

Unerwünschte Arzneimittelwirkungen als Ursache unspezifischer Symptome bei Patienten in der zentralen Notaufnahme

Adverse drug reactions as cause of nonspecific symptoms in patients in the emergency department

  • Notfallmedizin
  • Published:
Die Anaesthesiologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Bei einem großen Anteil der Patienten, die zentralen Notfallaufnahme (ZNA) zugeführt werden, ist das initiale Leitsymptom unspezifisch. Eine mögliche Ursache hierfür können gerade bei älteren Patienten unerwünschte Arzneimittelwirkungen (UAW) der häufig vorhandenen Polypharmazie sein.

Ziel der Arbeit

Veranschaulichung von UAW-Inzidenzen, der betroffenen Patientenklientel, inklusive Risikofaktoren, sowie von Arzneimittelklassen, deren UAW zu unspezifischen Symptomen führen können. Empfehlungen für die Praxis zum Management von UAW in der ZNA.

Material und Methode

Darstellung der pharmakologischen Grundlagen zu UAW, Statistiken der Pharmakovigilanzzentren sowie Originalliteratur unter Einbezug von Erfahrungen aus der klinischen Praxis und eigenen Projekten.

Ergebnisse

Bei 10 % der Patienten mit unspezifischen Symptomen ist eine UAW für die ZNA-Vorstellung verantwortlich. In 60 % der Fälle werden diese nicht korrekt erkannt. Eine geringe Anzahl an Arzneimittelklassen ist für die meisten dieser Zuweisungen verantwortlich. Zur Verbesserung der UAW-Identifikation und des UAW-Managements stehen Datenbanken, Risikostratifizierungen, klinische Pharmazeuten oder „clinical decision support systems“ zur Verfügung. Eine flächendeckende Anwendung dieser Möglichkeiten findet in deutschen Notaufnahmen bisher nicht statt.

Schlussfolgerungen

Eine korrekte Identifikation von UAW bei Patienten mit unspezifischen Symptomen in der ZNA ist notwendig, um die adäquate Therapie einleiten zu können. Häufig werden die UAW übersehen, da Prozesse und Tools zur Identifizierung und zum Management von UAW in der ZNA nicht angewendet werden. Bei Risikopatienten in der ZNA sollte der Fokus auf die Arzneimittelanamnese gelegt werden, idealerweise unter Berücksichtigung patientenindividueller Risikofaktoren und bestimmter Arzneimittelklassen.

Abstract

Background

In a large proportion of patients admitted to the emergency department (ED), the initial main symptom is nonspecific. One possible reason for this, especially in older patients, may be adverse drug reactions (ADR) due to their frequent polypharmacy.

Aim

To illustrate the incidence of ADRs, the affected patient population including risk factors, and drug classes with ADRs leading to nonspecific symptoms. To provide practice recommendations for the management of ADRs in the ED.

Material and methods

Presentation of the pharmacological principles on ADRs, statistics of pharmacovigilance centers as well as original literature including experiences from clinical practice and own projects.

Results

In 10% of patients with nonspecific symptoms an ADR is responsible for presentation in the ED. In 60% of cases these ADRs are not correctly identified in the ED setting. A small number of drug classes are responsible for most of these referrals. Databases, risk stratification, clinical pharmacists, or clinical decision support systems are available to improve ADR identification and management. As these options are partly associated with considerable costs or the validation for German EDs is missing, a widespread application does not take place.

Conclusion

Correct identification of ADRs in patients with nonspecific symptoms in the ED is necessary to initiate adequate treatment. These ADRs are often overlooked because processes and tools for identification and management are not applied in the ED, leading to a lack of awareness. For high-risk patients in the ED, the focus should be on drug history, ideally considering patient-specific risk factors and specific drug classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. (2015) American Geriatrics Society 2015 Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 63(11): 2227–2246

  2. Nickel CH, Ruedinger JM, Messmer AS et al (2013) Drug—related emergency department visits by elderly patients presenting with non-specific complaints. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med

  3. Deutscher Bundestag Sachstand zu unerwünschten Arzneimittelwirkungen, Meldeverfahren und Zahlen

  4. Dormann H, Criegee-Rieck M, Neubert A et al (2003) Lack of awareness of community-acquired adverse drug reactions upon hospital admission : dimensions and consequences of a dilemma. Drug Saf 26(5):353–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dormann H, Maas R, Eickhoff C et al (2018) Der bundeseinheitliche Medikationsplan in der Praxis : Die Pilotprojekte MetropolMediplan 2016, Modellregion Erfurt und PRIMA. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 61(9):1093–1102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Evans RS, Lloyd JF, Stoddard GJ et al (2005) Risk factors for adverse drug events: a 10-year analysis. Ann Pharmacother 39(7):1161–1168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fitzgerald RJ (2009) Medication errors: the importance of an accurate drug history. Br J Clin Pharmacol 67(6):671–675

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fox C, Richardson K, Maidment ID et al (2011) Anticholinergic medication use and cognitive impairment in the older population: the medical research council cognitive function and ageing study. J Am Geriatr Soc 59(8):1477–1483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Garfinkel D, Mangin D (2010) Feasibility study of a systematic approach for discontinuation of multiple medications in older adults: addressing polypharmacy. Arch Intern Med 170(18):1648–1654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gedde MH, Husebo BS, Mannseth J et al (2021) Less is more: the impact of deprescribing psychotropic drugs on behavioral and psychological symptoms and daily functioning in nursing home patients. Results from the cluster-randomized controlled COSMOS trial. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 29(3):304–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haerdtlein A, Boehmer AM, Dafonte KK et al (2022) Prioritisation of adverse drug events leading to hospital admission and occurring during Hospitalisation: a RAND survey. J Clin Med 11(15)

  12. Hellinger BJ, Gries A, Schiek S et al (2023) A prospective intervention study to identify drug-related emergency department visits comparing a standard care group and a pharmaceutical care group. Eur J Emerg Med

  13. Hohl CM, Zed PJ, Brubacher JR et al (2010) Do emergency physicians attribute drug-related emergency department visits to medication-related problems? Ann Emerg Med 55(6):493.e4–502.e4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hohl CM, Partovi N, Ghement I et al (2017) Impact of early in-hospital medication review by clinical pharmacists on health services utilization. PLoS One 12(2):e170495

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hohl CM, Badke K, Zhao A et al (2018) Prospective validation of clinical criteria to identify emergency department patients at high risk for adverse drug events. Acad Emerg Med 25(9):1015–1026

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Høj K, Pedersen HS, Lundberg ASB et al (2021) External validation of the medication risk score in polypharmacy patients in general practice: a tool for prioritizing patients at greatest risk of potential drug-related problems. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 129(4):319–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Just KS, Dormann H, Böhme M et al (2020) Personalising drug safety-results from the multi-centre prospective observational study on adverse drug reactions in emergency departments (ADRED). Eur J Clin Pharmacol 76(3):439–448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Just KS, Dormann H, Schurig M et al (2020) The phenotype of adverse drug effects: do emergency visits due to adverse drug reactions look different in older people? Results from the ADRED study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 86(11):2144–2154

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kemp K, Mertanen R, Lääperi M et al (2020) Nonspecific complaints in the emergency department—a systematic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 28(1):6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kiesel EK, Hopf YM, Drey M (2018) An anticholinergic burden score for German prescribers: score development. BMC Geriatr 18(1):239

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuhn M, Letunic I, Jensen LJ et al (2016) The SIDER database of drugs and side effects. Nucleic Acids Res 44(D1):D1075–D1079

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lima SIVC, Martins RR, Saldanha V et al (2020) Development and validation of a clinical instrument to predict risk of an adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients. PLoS One 15(12):e243714

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. de Lorenzo-Pinto A, García-Sánchez R, Herranz A et al (2020) Promoting clinical pharmacy services through advanced medication review in the emergency department. Eur J Hosp Pharm 27(2):73–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Markota M, Rummans TA, Bostwick JM et al (2016) Benzodiazepine use in older adults: dangers, management, and alternative therapies. Mayo Clin Proc 91(11):1632–1639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mockel M, Searle J, Muller R et al (2013) Chief complaints in medical emergencies: do they relate to underlying disease and outcome? The charité emergency medicine study (CHARITEM). Eur J Emerg Med 20(2):103–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mühlbauer B (2023) The new PRISCUS List—used judiciously, a valuable aid in deciding when to start and withdraw medications. Deutsches Ärzteblatt international

    Google Scholar 

  27. Otto R, Roller RE, Iglseder B et al (2010) Komplikationen durch Diuretikatherapie bei geriatrischen Patienten. Wien Med Wochenschr 160(11–12):276–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Patanwala AE, Hays DP, Sanders AB et al (2011) Severity and probability of harm of medication errors intercepted by an emergency department pharmacist. Int J Pharm Pract 19(5):358–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ramos-Casals M, Brahmer JR, Callahan MK et al (2020) Immune-related adverse events of checkpoint inhibitors. Nat Rev Dis Primers 6(1):38

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Rawle MJ, Cooper R, Kuh D et al (2018) Associations between polypharmacy and cognitive and physical capability: a british birth cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc 66(5):916–923

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Rottenkolber D, Schmiedl S, Rottenkolber M et al (2011) Adverse drug reactions in Germany: direct costs of internal medicine hospitalizations. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 20(6):626–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ruedinger JM, Nickel CH, Maile S et al (2012) Diuretic use, RAAS blockade and morbidity in elderly patients presenting to the emergency department with non-specific complaints. Swiss Med Wkly 142:w13568

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schneider RB, Iourinets J, Richard IH (2017) Parkinson’s disease psychosis: presentation, diagnosis and management. Neurodegener Dis Manag 7(6):365–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schurig AM, Böhme M, Just KS et al (2018) Adverse drug reactions (ADR) and emergencies. Dtsch Ärztebl Int 115(15):251–258

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Stingl JC, Just KS, Schurig M et al (2020) Prevalence of psychotropic drugs in cases of severe adverse drug reactions leading to unplanned emergency visits in general hospitals. Pharmacopsychiatry 53(3):133–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. van Cauwenberghe L, van Kemseke S, Oudaert E et al (2023) Interception of chronic medication discrepancies by the clinical pharmacist in the emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med 30(1):7–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Villa Zapata L, Subbian V, Boyce RD et al (2022) Overriding drug-drug interaction alerts in clinical decision support systems: a scoping review. Stud Health Technol Inform 290:380–384

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. de Winter S, Spriet I, Indevuyst C et al (2010) Pharmacist- versus physician-acquired medication history: a prospective study at the emergency department. Qual Saf Health Care 19(5):371–375

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. World Health Organization (2003) Adherence to long-term therapies. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin J. Hellinger.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

B.J. Hellinger, Y. Remane, T. Bertsche und A. Gries geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autor/-innen keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

Hinweis des Verlags

Der Verlag bleibt in Hinblick auf geografische Zuordnungen und Gebietsbezeichnungen in veröffentlichten Karten und Institutsadressen neutral.

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hellinger, B.J., Remane, Y., Bertsche, T. et al. Unerwünschte Arzneimittelwirkungen als Ursache unspezifischer Symptome bei Patienten in der zentralen Notaufnahme. Anaesthesiologie 72, 887–893 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-023-01355-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-023-01355-4

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation