Literatur
Hammond NE et al (2017) Patterns of intravenous fluid resuscitation use in adult intensive care patients between 2007 and 2014: An international cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 12(5):e176292
Young P et al (2015) Effect of a buffered crystalloid solution vs saline on acute kidney injury among patients in the intensive care unit: the SPLIT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314(16):1701–1710
Semler MW et al (2018) Balanced crystalloids versus saline in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med 378(9):829–839
Zampieri FG et al (2021) Effect of intravenous fluid treatment with a balanced solution vs 0.9% saline solution on mortality in critically ill patients: the BaSICS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.11684
Finfer S et al (2022) Balanced multielectrolyte solution versus saline in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2114464
Hammond DA et al (2020) Balanced crystalloids versus saline in critically ill adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Pharmacother 54(1):5–13
Zampieri FG et al (2021) Effect of slower vs faster intravenous fluid bolus rates on mortality in critically ill patients: the BaSICS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 326(9):830–838
Badawi O et al (2012) Association between intensive care unit-acquired dysglycemia and in-hospital mortality. Crit Care Med 40(12):3180–3188
van den Berghe G et al (2001) Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 345(19):1359–1367
Van den Berghe G et al (2006) Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU. N Engl J Med 354(5):449–461
Investigators N‑SS et al (2009) Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 360(13):1283–1297
Preiser JC et al (2009) A prospective randomised multi-centre controlled trial on tight glucose control by intensive insulin therapy in adult intensive care units: the Glucontrol study. Intensive Care Med 35(10):1738–1748
Ichai C et al (2010) International recommendations for glucose control in adult non diabetic critically ill patients. Crit Care 14(5):R166
Evans L et al (2021) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med 47(11):1181–1247
Hagel S et al (2022) Effect of therapeutic drug monitoring-based dose optimization of piperacillin/tazobactam on sepsis-related organ dysfunction in patients with sepsis: a randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 48(3):311–321
Johnstone J et al (2021) Effect of probiotics on incident ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 326(11):1024–1033
Casamento AJ et al (2021) A phase II cluster-crossover randomized trial of fentanyl versus morphine for analgosedation in mechanically ventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 204(11):1286–1294
Thiel HNR (2021) Anästhesiologische Pharmakotherapie: Von den Grundlagen der Pharmakologie zur Medikamentenpraxis Bd. 4
Hughes CG et al (2021) Dexmedetomidine or propofol for sedation in mechanically ventilated adults with sepsis. N Engl J Med 384(15):1424–1436
Devlin JW et al (2018) Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med 46(9):e825–e873
S3-Leitlinie Analgesie, Sedierung und Delirmanagement in der Intensivmedizin in DAS-Leitlinie 2020. AWMF-Registernummer: 001/012.
Geense WW et al (2021) New physical, mental, and cognitive problems 1 year after ICU admission: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 203(12):1512–1521
Hughes CG et al (2021) Association of delirium during critical illness with mortality: multicenter prospective cohort study. Anesth Analg 133(5):1152–1161
DGAI, D.G.f.A.u.I.e. V. Analgesie, Sedierung und Delirmanagement in der Intensivmedizin (DAS-Leitlinie). Registernummer 001 – 012 31. März 2021
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
M. Dietrich, C. Beynon, M.O. Fiedler, M. Bernhard, A. Hecker, C. Jungk, C. Nusshag, D. Michalski, F.C.F. Schmitt, T. Brenner, M.A . Weigand und C.J. Reuß geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Additional information
Da viele Studien unter Akronymen veröffentlicht und besprochen werden, gibt Tab. 1 einen Überblick über die im vergangenen Jahr erschienenen Studien unter gleichzeitiger Nennung der jeweiligen Akronyme (sofern vorhanden).
QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dietrich, M., Beynon, C., Fiedler, M.O. et al. Fokus allgemeine Intensivmedizin 2021/2022. Anaesthesiologie 71, 714–721 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-022-01173-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-022-01173-0