Abstract
Background and objective
In today’s rapidly changing world, the technology of social media is widely used for educational purposes. Our aim in this study was to investigate the accuracy and efficacy of video presentations of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy procedures available on the international video sharing website YouTube.
Methods
On 1 December 2020, the terms “percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy” and “percutaneous tracheostomy” were entered into the search feature of YouTube (www.youtube.com). The evaluation was made in three categories; general information about percutaneous tracheostomy, performing percutaneous tracheostomy steps and demographic features of videos.
Results
The median number of viewings of the videos on the date our data were collected was 1342 (IQR, 237–8052), and the most watched video had been viewed 325,170 times. Surgical site cleaning was explained in 46 (65.7%) videos and incision site detection in 55 (78.6%) videos. Needle aspiration into the trachea, insertion of the Seldinger guidewire, dilatation, and tracheal tube placement were covered in all videos (70; 100%). Confirmation of the location of the tracheal tube with end tidal capnography, the last step of the procedure, is available in 34 videos (48.6%).
Conclusion
The use of inexpensive or freely available teaching materials is possible but should always be checked before use with respect to the completeness and correctness of the content conveyed. The unreflected adoption of such content can lead to serious treatment errors.
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund und Ziel
In der sich schnell verändernden Welt von heute wird die Technologie der sozialen Medien in großem Umfang für Bildungszwecke genutzt. Ziel dieser Studie war es, die Genauigkeit und Wirksamkeit von Videodarstellungen perkutaner dilatativer Tracheostomieverfahren zu untersuchen, die auf der internationalen Videoplattform YouTube verfügbar sind.
Material und Methoden
Am 1. Dezember 2020 wurden die Begriffe „perkutane Dilatationstracheostomie“ und „perkutane Tracheostomie“ in die Suchfunktion von YouTube (www.youtube.com) eingegeben. Die Auswertung erfolgte in drei Kategorien: allgemeine Informationen über die perkutane Tracheotomie, die Durchführung der perkutanen Tracheotomie und demografische Merkmale des Videos.
Ergebnisse
Die durchschnittliche Anzahl der Aufrufe der Videos zum Zeitpunkt der Datenerhebung betrug 1342 (237–8052), und das meist gesehene Video wurde 325.170 Mal angesehen. Die Desinfektion der Punktions‑/Inzisionsstelle (46; 65,7 %) und die Bestimmung des Inzisionsgebiets (55; 78,6 %) wurden in den meisten Videos gezeigt. Die Nadelaspiration in die Trachea, das Einführen des Seldinger-Führungsdrahtes, die Dilatation und die Platzierung des Trachealtubus wurden in allen Videos (70; 100 %) behandelt. Die Bestätigung der Lage des Trachealtubus, der letzte Schritt des Verfahrens, ist in 34 Videos (48,6 %) zu sehen.
Diskussion
Die Nutzung preiswerter oder frei zugänglicher Unterrichtsmaterialien ist möglich, sollte aber vor der Nutzung stets hinsichtlich der Vollständigkeit und Richtigkeit der vermittelten Inhalte überprüft werden. Die unreflektierte Annahme solcher Inhalte kann zu schwerwiegenden Behandlungsfehlern führen.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hashimoto DA, Axtell AL, Percutaneous Tracheostomy AHG (2020) Nov 12. N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMvcm2014884
Thomson S (1931) A Permanent Tracheostomy in Stenosis of the Larynx. Proc R Soc Med 9;24(11:1588–1596
Ciaglia P, Firsching R, Syniec C (1985) Elective percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A new simple bedside procedure; preliminary report. Chest 5;87(6:715–719
Pardo MA, Sumner JP, Friello A, Fletcher DJ, Goggs R. Assessment of the percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy technique in experimental manikins and canine cadavers. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2019 9;29(5):484–494.
Raimondi N, Vial MR, Calleja J, Quintero A, Cortés A, Celis E, Pacheco C, Ugarte S, Añón JM, Hernández G, Vidal E, Chiappero G, Ríos F, Castilleja F, Matos A, Rodriguez E, Antoniazzi P, Teles JM, Dueñas C, Sinclair J, Martínez L, von der Osten I, Vergara J, Jiménez E, Arroyo M, Rodríguez C, Torres J, Fernandez-Bussy S, Nates JL; FEPIMCTI and LACCTIN. Evidence-based guidelines for the use of tracheostomy in critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:304–318.
Mehta C, Mehta Y (2017) Percutaneous tracheostomy. Ann Card Anaesth 20(Supplement):S19–S25 (Jan)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SloXwGG2n-Q. Accessed 14 Dec 2020
Rabee R, Najim M, Sherwani Y, Ahmed M, Ashraf M, Al-Jibury O, Rabee N, Najim R, Ahmed A (2015) YouTube in medical education: a student’s perspective. Med Educ Online 16;20:29507
Ng MK, Emara AK, Molloy RM, Krebs VE, Mont M, Piuzzi NS (2020) YouTube as a Source of Patient Information for Total Knee/Hip Arthroplasty: Quantitative Analysis of Video Reliability, Quality, and Content. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 11:25
Loeb S, Reines K, Abu-Salha Y, French W, Butaney M, Macaluso JN Jr, Steinberg GD, Walter D, Byrne N, la Garza D, Smith AB. Quality of Bladder Cancer Information on YouTube. Eur Urol. 2020 9; 30:S0302-2838(20)30706‑5.
Wu V, Lee DJ, Vescan A, Lee JM (2020) Evaluating YouTube as a Source of Patient Information for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Ear Nose Throat J 10: 6:145561320962867
Batar N, Kermen S, Sevdin S, Yıldız N, Güçlü D (2020) Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of Information on Nutrition After Bariatric Surgery on YouTube. OBES SURG 30(12):4905–4910 (Dec)
Karabay E, Karsiyakali N, Kayar K, Koseoglu H (2019) Hypospadias surgery on YouTube: is it valid? Minerva Pediatr. https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5276.19.05555-5
Knopf JD, Kumar R, Barats M, Klimo P Jr, Boop FA, Michael LM 2nd, Martin JE, Bookland M, Hersh DS (2020) Neurosurgical Operative Videos: An Analysis of an Increasingly Popular Educational Resource. World Neurosurg 144:e428–37
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyUrHRJsQMA. Accessed 14 Dec 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1Hm2MhPWIY. Accessed 14 Dec 2020
Ulatowski N, Karolak W, Łoś A, Kołaczkowska M, Siondalski P (2020) Iatrogenic aortic arch injury after unsuccessful percutaneous tracheostomy. J Card Surg 3;35(3:686–688
Arora R, Kumar S, Sachan S (2017) GuideWire Migrating into Murphy’s Eye of Endotracheal Tube: An Unusual Complication of Percutaneous Dilational Tracheostomy. Anesth Essays Res 11(4):1091–1093
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HK and NŞB: study design, data collection, data analysis, writing
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
H. Kocayiğit and N.Ş. Bal declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical standards.
For this article no studies with human participants or animals were performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Scan QR code & read article online
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kocayiğit, H., Bal, N.Ş. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: evaluation of YouTube videos. Anaesthesiologie 71 (Suppl 2), 219–223 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-022-01122-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-022-01122-x