Skip to main content
Log in

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: evaluation of YouTube videos

Perkutane Dilatationstracheostomie: Bewertung von YouTube-Videos

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Die Anaesthesiologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and objective

In today’s rapidly changing world, the technology of social media is widely used for educational purposes. Our aim in this study was to investigate the accuracy and efficacy of video presentations of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy procedures available on the international video sharing website YouTube.

Methods

On 1 December 2020, the terms “percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy” and “percutaneous tracheostomy” were entered into the search feature of YouTube (www.youtube.com). The evaluation was made in three categories; general information about percutaneous tracheostomy, performing percutaneous tracheostomy steps and demographic features of videos.

Results

The median number of viewings of the videos on the date our data were collected was 1342 (IQR, 237–8052), and the most watched video had been viewed 325,170 times. Surgical site cleaning was explained in 46 (65.7%) videos and incision site detection in 55 (78.6%) videos. Needle aspiration into the trachea, insertion of the Seldinger guidewire, dilatation, and tracheal tube placement were covered in all videos (70; 100%). Confirmation of the location of the tracheal tube with end tidal capnography, the last step of the procedure, is available in 34 videos (48.6%).

Conclusion

The use of inexpensive or freely available teaching materials is possible but should always be checked before use with respect to the completeness and correctness of the content conveyed. The unreflected adoption of such content can lead to serious treatment errors.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund und Ziel

In der sich schnell verändernden Welt von heute wird die Technologie der sozialen Medien in großem Umfang für Bildungszwecke genutzt. Ziel dieser Studie war es, die Genauigkeit und Wirksamkeit von Videodarstellungen perkutaner dilatativer Tracheostomieverfahren zu untersuchen, die auf der internationalen Videoplattform YouTube verfügbar sind.

Material und Methoden

Am 1. Dezember 2020 wurden die Begriffe „perkutane Dilatationstracheostomie“ und „perkutane Tracheostomie“ in die Suchfunktion von YouTube (www.youtube.com) eingegeben. Die Auswertung erfolgte in drei Kategorien: allgemeine Informationen über die perkutane Tracheotomie, die Durchführung der perkutanen Tracheotomie und demografische Merkmale des Videos.

Ergebnisse

Die durchschnittliche Anzahl der Aufrufe der Videos zum Zeitpunkt der Datenerhebung betrug 1342 (237–8052), und das meist gesehene Video wurde 325.170 Mal angesehen. Die Desinfektion der Punktions‑/Inzisionsstelle (46; 65,7 %) und die Bestimmung des Inzisionsgebiets (55; 78,6 %) wurden in den meisten Videos gezeigt. Die Nadelaspiration in die Trachea, das Einführen des Seldinger-Führungsdrahtes, die Dilatation und die Platzierung des Trachealtubus wurden in allen Videos (70; 100 %) behandelt. Die Bestätigung der Lage des Trachealtubus, der letzte Schritt des Verfahrens, ist in 34 Videos (48,6 %) zu sehen.

Diskussion

Die Nutzung preiswerter oder frei zugänglicher Unterrichtsmaterialien ist möglich, sollte aber vor der Nutzung stets hinsichtlich der Vollständigkeit und Richtigkeit der vermittelten Inhalte überprüft werden. Die unreflektierte Annahme solcher Inhalte kann zu schwerwiegenden Behandlungsfehlern führen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hashimoto DA, Axtell AL, Percutaneous Tracheostomy AHG (2020) Nov 12. N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMvcm2014884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thomson S (1931) A Permanent Tracheostomy in Stenosis of the Larynx. Proc R Soc Med 9;24(11:1588–1596

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ciaglia P, Firsching R, Syniec C (1985) Elective percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A new simple bedside procedure; preliminary report. Chest 5;87(6:715–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pardo MA, Sumner JP, Friello A, Fletcher DJ, Goggs R. Assessment of the percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy technique in experimental manikins and canine cadavers. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2019 9;29(5):484–494.

  5. Raimondi N, Vial MR, Calleja J, Quintero A, Cortés A, Celis E, Pacheco C, Ugarte S, Añón JM, Hernández G, Vidal E, Chiappero G, Ríos F, Castilleja F, Matos A, Rodriguez E, Antoniazzi P, Teles JM, Dueñas C, Sinclair J, Martínez L, von der Osten I, Vergara J, Jiménez E, Arroyo M, Rodríguez C, Torres J, Fernandez-Bussy S, Nates JL; FEPIMCTI and LACCTIN. Evidence-based guidelines for the use of tracheostomy in critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:304–318.

  6. Mehta C, Mehta Y (2017) Percutaneous tracheostomy. Ann Card Anaesth 20(Supplement):S19–S25 (Jan)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SloXwGG2n-Q. Accessed 14 Dec 2020

  8. Rabee R, Najim M, Sherwani Y, Ahmed M, Ashraf M, Al-Jibury O, Rabee N, Najim R, Ahmed A (2015) YouTube in medical education: a student’s perspective. Med Educ Online 16;20:29507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ng MK, Emara AK, Molloy RM, Krebs VE, Mont M, Piuzzi NS (2020) YouTube as a Source of Patient Information for Total Knee/Hip Arthroplasty: Quantitative Analysis of Video Reliability, Quality, and Content. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 11:25

    Google Scholar 

  10. Loeb S, Reines K, Abu-Salha Y, French W, Butaney M, Macaluso JN Jr, Steinberg GD, Walter D, Byrne N, la Garza D, Smith AB. Quality of Bladder Cancer Information on YouTube. Eur Urol. 2020 9; 30:S0302-2838(20)30706‑5.

  11. Wu V, Lee DJ, Vescan A, Lee JM (2020) Evaluating YouTube as a Source of Patient Information for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Ear Nose Throat J 10: 6:145561320962867

    Google Scholar 

  12. Batar N, Kermen S, Sevdin S, Yıldız N, Güçlü D (2020) Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of Information on Nutrition After Bariatric Surgery on YouTube. OBES SURG 30(12):4905–4910 (Dec)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Karabay E, Karsiyakali N, Kayar K, Koseoglu H (2019) Hypospadias surgery on YouTube: is it valid? Minerva Pediatr. https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5276.19.05555-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Knopf JD, Kumar R, Barats M, Klimo P Jr, Boop FA, Michael LM 2nd, Martin JE, Bookland M, Hersh DS (2020) Neurosurgical Operative Videos: An Analysis of an Increasingly Popular Educational Resource. World Neurosurg 144:e428–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyUrHRJsQMA. Accessed 14 Dec 2020

  16. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1Hm2MhPWIY. Accessed 14 Dec 2020

  17. Ulatowski N, Karolak W, Łoś A, Kołaczkowska M, Siondalski P (2020) Iatrogenic aortic arch injury after unsuccessful percutaneous tracheostomy. J Card Surg 3;35(3:686–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Arora R, Kumar S, Sachan S (2017) GuideWire Migrating into Murphy’s Eye of Endotracheal Tube: An Unusual Complication of Percutaneous Dilational Tracheostomy. Anesth Essays Res 11(4):1091–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HK and NŞB: study design, data collection, data analysis, writing

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Havva Kocayiğit MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

H. Kocayiğit and N.Ş. Bal declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards.

For this article no studies with human participants or animals were performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

figure qr

Scan QR code & read article online

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kocayiğit, H., Bal, N.Ş. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: evaluation of YouTube videos. Anaesthesiologie 71 (Suppl 2), 219–223 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-022-01122-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-022-01122-x

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation