Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Zur Qualität von bibliometrischen Analysen

On the quality of bibliometric analyses

  • Leserbriefe
  • Published:
Der Anaesthesist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Originalien to this article was published on 18 May 2021

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Ausserer J, Miller C, Putzer G et al (2017) International publication trends originating from anaesthetic departments from 2001 to 2015. Anaesthesia 72(10):1243–1250. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ball R, Tunger D (2005) Bibliometrische Analysen – Daten, Fakten und Methoden. Grundwissen Bibliometrie für Wissenschaftler, Wissenschaftsmanager, Forschungseinrichtungen und Hochschulen. Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich Reihe Bibliothek, Bd. 12. Forschungszentrum, Zentralbibliothek, Jülich

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benzer A, Pomaroli A, Hauffe H et al (1993) Geographical analysis of medical publications in 1990. Lancet 341(8839):247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(93)90116-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bitzinger D (2015) Bündnis Junge Ärzte – Positionspapier zur Arbeitsverdichtung im deutschen Gesundheitsystem. Anasth Intensivmed 56:196–197

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bitzinger D, Raspe M, Schulte K et al (2017) Evaluation der Arbeits- und Weiterbildungsbedingungen im Fachgebiet Anästhesiologie in Deutschland. Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Befragung. Anasth Intensivmed 58:429–440

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bould MD, Boet S, Sharma B et al (2011) h‑Indices in a university department of anaesthesia: an evaluation of their feasibility, reliability, and validity as an assessment of academic performance. Br J Anaesth 106(3):325–330. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brunner E, Herrmann-Lingen C (2012) Bibliometrie in der Medizin – die Position der AWMF. Bibliometrie 1:21–24

    Google Scholar 

  8. Callaway E (2016) Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric. Nature 535(7611):210–211. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.20224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen Q, Yang H, Chen D et al (2021) Global distribution of publications in anesthesiology. Anaesthesist. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-021-00969-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cools E, Ausserer J, van de Velde M et al (2017) Anaesthesiology research in the European Union and the European Free Trade Association. Eur J Anaesthesiol 34(12):814–823. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cools E, Ausserer J, van de Velde M et al (2019) Publications from university-affiliated anaesthesiology departments: a look at Belgium, France and the Netherlands from 2001 to 2015. Scientometrics 119(2):863–878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03075-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Feneck RO, Natarajan N, Sebastian R et al (2008) Decline in research publications from the United Kingdom in anaesthesia journals from 1997 to 2006. Anaesthesia 63(3):270–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05475.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Figueredo E, Sanchez Perales G, Munoz Blanco F (2003) International publishing in anaesthesia—How do different countries contribute? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 47(4):378–382. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00105.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Flaatten H, Rasmussen LS, Haney M (2016) Publication footprints and pitfalls of bibliometry. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 60(1):3–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hansson S (1995) Impact factor as a misleading tool in evaluation of medical journals. Lancet 346(8979):906

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Herrmann-Lingen C, Brunner E, Hildenbrand S et al (2014) Evaluation of medical research performance—position paper of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF). Ger Med Sci 12:Doc11. https://doi.org/10.3205/000196

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hildebrand AM, Iansavichus AV, Haynes RB et al (2014) High-performance information search filters for acute kidney injury content in PubMed, Ovid Medline and Embase. Nephrol Dial Transplant 29(4):823–832. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gft531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Joannidis M (2009) „Freizeitforschung“ – eine Realität an Österreichs Universitätskliniken. Wien Klin Wochenschr 121(21–22):665–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-009-1276-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller C, Ausserer J, Putzer G et al (2019) Anästhesiologie-Publikationen aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz 2011–2015: Wissenschaftliche Publikationen der Universitätskliniken in D‑A-CH. Anaesthesist 68(5):294–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-019-0582-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller C, Prenn R, Ausserer J et al (2018) Publications by Scandinavian university Departments of Anaesthesiology from 2001 to 2015. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 62(9):1304–1313. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller J, Chuba E, Deiner S et al (2019) Trends in authorship in anesthesiology journals. Anesth Analg 129(1):306–310. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000003949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moppett IK, Hardman JG (2011) Bibliometrics of anaesthesia researchers in the UK. Br J Anaesth 107(3):351–356. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (2021) PubMed help. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK3827/#pubmedhelp.FAQs. Zugegriffen: 24. Mai 2021

  24. Pandit JJ, Yentis SM (2005) All that glisters…how to assess the ‘value’ of a scientific paper. Anaesthesia 60(4):373–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04151.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Peters J (2014) Spieglein, Spieglein an der Wand oder Menetekel? Publikationsleistung universitärer Anästhesiekliniken. Anaesthesist 63(4):273–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-014-2294-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pomaroli A, Haufe H, Benzer A (1994) Who publishes in the large anaesthesia journals? Br J Anaesth 72:723–725

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rusanov A, Miotto R, Weng C (2018) Trends in anesthesiology research: a machine learning approach to theme discovery and summarization. JAMIA Open 1(2):283–293. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt CE, Möller J, Schmidt K et al (2011) Generation Y: Rekrutierung, Entwicklung und Bindung. Anaesthesist 60(6):517–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-011-1886-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Seglen PO (1997) Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 314(7079):498–502. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Szokol JW, Murphy GS, Avram MJ et al (2003) Declining proportion of publications by American authors in major anesthesiology journals. Anesth Analg 96(2):513–517. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-200302000-00039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tripathi RS, Blum JM, Papadimos TJ et al (2011) A bibliometric search of citation classics in anesthesiology. BMC Anesthesiol 11:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-11-24

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. van Noorden R, Singh Chawla D (2019) Hundreds of extreme self-citing scientists revealed in new database. Nature 572(7771):578–579. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02479-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Georg-August-Universität, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland

    Clemens Miller

  2. Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Friedrichshafen, Medizin Campus Bodensee, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Friedrichshafen, Deutschland

    Volker Wenzel

Authors
  1. Clemens Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Volker Wenzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clemens Miller.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

C. Miller und V. Wenzel geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Additional information

Hinweis: Der Leserbrief wurde in Englisch an die Autoren Chen et al. geschickt, mit der Gelegenheit zur Replik. Die Autoren haben davon keinen Gebrauch gemacht.

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miller, C., Wenzel, V. Zur Qualität von bibliometrischen Analysen. Anaesthesist 70, 863–865 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-021-01030-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-021-01030-6

Search

Navigation