Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of a miniaturized handheld arterial pressure monitor for guiding full and partial REBOA use during resuscitation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a well-validated method for the control of noncompressible truncal hemorrhage. In lower resource or battlefield settings, the need for arterial line setup and monitoring is problematic and potentially prohibitive. We sought to evaluate the accuracy and precision of a miniaturized portable device (Centurion COMPASS®) versus standard arterial pressure monitoring using standard ER-REBOA and partial REBOA (pREBOA) as a high-fidelity and space-/time-conserving alternative.

Methods

A total of 40 swine underwent a four-phase validation/precision study (each phase using five ER-REBOAs and five pREBOAs). Phases I/II evaluated accuracy with full and pREBOA in uninjured animals. Phases III/IV duplicated the previous phases but in a severe hemorrhagic shock model. Carotid and femoral pressures were monitored with both intra-arterial pressure systems and the COMPASS® device. The vascular flow was measured by aortic flow probes. Correlation and Bland–Altman analysis were performed.

Results

There was a strong correlation in accuracy testing of proximal and distal COMPASS® devices compared to standard intra-arterial pressure monitoring (r = 0.94, 0.8; p < 0.005) as well as during precision testing (r = 0.98, 0.89 p < 0.005) in the uninjured phases. Similar accuracy and reliability were demonstrated in hemorrhagic shock, with a strong correlation for the proximal and distal COMPASS® devices (r = 0.98, 0.97; p < 0.005), as well as during precision testing (r = 0.99, 0.95; p < 0.005) in both full and pREBOA scenarios. Bland–Altman analysis showed extremely low bias between the COMPASS® and arterial line for both proximal (bias = 1.9) and distal (bias = 0.8) pressure measurements.

Conclusion

The COMPASS® provides accurate and precise pressure measurements during standard and partial REBOA in both uninjured and shock conditions. This device may help extend and enhance capability in any low-resource/battlefield settings, or even eliminate the need for standard intra-arterial invasive pressure monitoring and external setup.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stannard A, Morrison JJ, Scott DJ, Ivatury RA, Ross JD, Rasmussen TE. The epidemiology of noncompressible torso hemorrhage in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(3):830–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DuBose JJ. How I do it: Partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (P-REBOA). J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(1):197–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Russo RM, Williams TK, Grayson JK, Lamb CM, Cannon JW, Clement NF, et al. Extending the golden hour: partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in a highly lethal swine liver injury model. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80(3):372–8 (discussion 8-80).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Russo RM, Neff LP, Lamb CM, Cannon JW, Galante JM, Clement NF, et al. Partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in swine model of hemorrhagic shock. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223(2):359–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Williams TK, Neff LP, Johnson MA, Ferencz SA, Davidson AJ, Russo RM, et al. Extending resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: endovascular variable aortic control in a lethal model of hemorrhagic shock. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(2):294–301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ogura T, Lefor AK, Nakamura M, Fujizuka K, Shiroto K, Nakano M. Ultrasound-guided resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in the resuscitation area. J Emerg Med. 2017;52(5):715–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reva VA, Hörer TM, Makhnovskiy AI, Sokhranov MV, Samokhvalov IM, DuBose JJ. Field and en route resuscitative endovascular occlusion of the aorta: a feasible military reality? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(1 Suppl 1):S170–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Manley JD, Mitchell BJ, DuBose JJ, Rasmussen TE. a modern case series of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) in an out-of-hospital, combat casualty care setting. J Spec Oper Med. 2017;17(1):1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lendrum R, Perkins Z, Chana M, Marsden M, Davenport R, Grier G, et al. Pre-hospital Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) for exsanguinating pelvic haemorrhage. Resuscitation. 2019;135:6–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cannon J, Morrison J, Lauer C, Grabo D, Polk T, Blackbourne L, et al. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) for Hemorrhagic Shock. Mil Med. 2018;183(suppl_2):55–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Russo RM, White JM, Baer DG. Partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: a systematic review of the preclinical and clinical literature. J Surg Res. 2021;262:101–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lallemand MS, Moe DM, McClellan JM, Smith JP, Daab L, Marko S, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for major abdominal venous injury in a porcine hemorrhagic shock model. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(2):230–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson MA, Davidson AJ, Russo RM, Ferencz SE, Gotlib O, Rasmussen TE, et al. Small changes, big effects: The hemodynamics of partial and complete aortic occlusion to inform next generation resuscitation techniques and technologies. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;82(6):1106–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saugel B, Kouz K, Meidert AS, Schulte-Uentrop L, Romagnoli S. How to measure blood pressure using an arterial catheter: a systematic 5-step approach. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):172.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Togashi K, Nandate K, Hoaglan C, Sherman B, Bowdle A. A multicenter evaluation of a compact, sterile, single-use pressure transducer for central venous catheter placement. Anesth Analg. 2013;116(5):1018–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmid KM, Lauria MJ, Braude DA, Crandall CS, Marinaro JL. Accuracy and reliability of a disposable vascular pressure device for arterial pressure monitoring in critical care transport. Air Med J. 2020;39(5):389–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Carr MJ, Benham DA, Lee JJ, Calvo RY, Wessels LE, Schrader AJ, et al. Real-time bedside management and titration of partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta without an arterial line: good for pressure, not for flow! J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021;90(4):615–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Giavarina D. Understanding bland Altman analysis. Biochemia Medica. 2015;25(2):141–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Percie Du Sert N, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biol. 2020;18(7):e3000410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang R, Fox EE, Greene TJ, Eastridge BJ, Gilani R, Chung KK, et al. Multicenter retrospective study of noncompressible torso hemorrhage: anatomic locations of bleeding and comparison of endovascular versus open approach. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(1):11–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Eastridge BJ, Hardin M, Cantrell J, Oetjen-Gerdes L, Zubko T, Mallak C, et al. Died of wounds on the battlefield: causation and implications for improving combat casualty care. J Trauma. 2011;71(1 Suppl):S4-8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kotwal RS, Butler FK Jr. Junctional hemorrhage control for tactical combat casualty care. Wilderness Environ Med. 2017;28(2S):S33–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sims K, Montgomery HR, Dituro P, Kheirabadi BS, Butler FK. Management of external hemorrhage in tactical combat casualty care: the adjunctive use of XStat compressed hemostatic sponges: TCCC Guidelines Change 15–03. J Spec Oper Med. 2016;16(1):19–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bennett BL, Littlejohn LF, Kheirabadi BS, Butler FK, Kotwal RS, Dubick MA, et al. Management of external hemorrhage in tactical combat casualty care: chitosan-based hemostatic gauze dressings–TCCC Guidelines-Change 13–05. J Spec Oper Med. 2014;14(3):40–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Holcomb JB, Jenkins D, Rhee P, Johannigman J, Mahoney P, Mehta S, et al. Damage control resuscitation: directly addressing the early coagulopathy of trauma. J Trauma. 2007;62(2):307–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Martin M, Oh J, Currier H, Tai N, Beekley A, Eckert M, et al. An analysis of in-hospital deaths at a modern combat support hospital. J Trauma. 2009;66(4 Suppl):S51-60 (discussion S-1).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Spinella PC, Perkins JG, Grathwohl KW, Beekley AC, Holcomb JB. Warm fresh whole blood is independently associated with improved survival for patients with combat-related traumatic injuries. J Trauma. 2009;66(4 Suppl):S69-76.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Biffl WL, Fox CJ, Moore EE. The role of REBOA in the control of exsanguinating torso hemorrhage. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(5):1054–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lyon RF, Northern DM. REBOA by a non-surgeon as an adjunct during MASCAL. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(6):1121e5-e6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Northern DM, Manley JD, Lyon R, Farber D, Mitchell BJ, Filak KJ, et al. Recent advances in austere combat surgery: Use of aortic balloon occlusion as well as blood challenges by special operations medical forces in recent combat operations. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;85(1S Suppl 2):S98–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Holtestaul T, Jones I, Conner J, Lammers D, Weiss J, Bingham J, et al. REBOA management guided by a novel handheld pressure transducer. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022;92(4):729–34.

  32. De Schoutheete JC, Fourneau I, Waroquier F, De Cupere L, O’Connor M, Van Cleynenbreugel K, et al. Three cases of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in austere pre-hospital environment—technical and methodological aspects. World J Emerg Surg. 2018;13(54). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-018-0213-2

  33. Wessels LE, Wallace JD, Bowie J, Butler WJ, Spalding C, Krzyzaniak M. Radiofrequency identification of the ER-REBOA: confirmation of placement without fluoroscopy. Mil Med. 2019;184(3–4):e285–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Scott DJ, Eliason JL, Villamaria C, Morrison JJ, Houston Rt, Spencer JR, et al. A novel fluoroscopy-free, resuscitative endovascular aortic balloon occlusion system in a model of hemorrhagic shock. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75(1):122–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Linnebur M, Inaba K, Haltmeier T, Rasmussen TE, Smith J, Mendelsberg R, et al. Emergent non-image-guided resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) catheter placement: a cadaver-based study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(3):453–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was funded by the Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center (TATRC) at the United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command through the AMEDD Advanced Medical Technology Initiative (AAMTI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DB, LW, MC, MM, and MK contributed to the literature search; LW, DB, AS, MC, DL, ME, MK, and MM contributed to the study design; DB, MC, JL, RC, AS, TH, DL, IJ, JC, and JW collected the data; DB, TH, RC, MC, MK, ME, and MM interpreted the data; DB, LW, MC, MK, and MM wrote the article; DB, MC, LW, JL, RC, AS, TH, DL, IJ, JC, JW, ME, MK, and MM performed critical revisions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew J. Martin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Picture 1: COMPASS devices used during experimentation

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benham, D.A., Carr, M.J., Wessels, L. et al. Validation of a miniaturized handheld arterial pressure monitor for guiding full and partial REBOA use during resuscitation. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 49, 795–801 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02121-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02121-8

Keywords

Navigation