Skip to main content
Log in

Radiation exposure during 3D fluoroscopy of the knee: an experimental study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To measure the radiation exposure at the knee and surrounding area during the use of 3D fluoroscopy.

Methods

An experimental study was conducted by using a human cadaveric knee as a focus point for the 3D fluoroscope. An isocentric C-arm fluoroscope machine was applied on the lateral side of the knee. The radiation dosage at the focus point and surrounding area was measured. The mean radiation exposure in each location was compared between low- and high-resolution scanning.

Results

The mean radiation sustained at the focus point was 44.0 ± 5.6 μSv and 20.0 ± 1.0 μSv in high- and low-resolution scanning, respectively. Radiation exposure on the opposite side of the C-arm machine was found to be higher than that on the other locations with the same distance from the focus point. In low-resolution scanning, radiation could not be detected beyond 75 cm from the focus point at the proximal, distal and same side of the machine. Radiation could be measured at a distance of up to 1.25 m on the opposite side of the machine. In high-resolution scanning, radiation could be measured at a distance of up to 1 m at the proximal, distal and same side of the C-arm, but up to 1.5 m on the opposite side.

Conclusion

Radiation exposure during 3D fluoroscopy of the knee decreases with increasing distance from the focus point. A higher number of scans in the high-resolution mode causes greater radiation exposure. In isocentric 3D fluoroscopy of the knee, a safe zone is located at least 1.5 m away from the focus point.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atesok K, Finkelstein J, Khoury A, Peyser A, Weil Y, Liebergall M, et al. The use of intraoperative three-dimensional imaging (ISO-C-3D) in fixation of intraarticular fractures. Injury. 2007;38:1163–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kendoff D, Gardner MJ, Citak M, Kfuri M Jr, Thumes B, Krettek C, et al. Value of 3D fluoroscopic imaging of acetabular fractures comparison to 2D fluoroscopy and CT imaging. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128:599–605.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rübberdt A, Feil R, Stengel D, Spranger N, Mutze S, Wich M, et al. The clinical use of the ISO-C(3D) imaging system in calcaneus fracture surgery. Unfallchirurg. 2006;109:112–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Citak M, Kendoff D, Kfuri M Jr, Pearle A, Krettek C, Hüfner T. Accuracy analysis of Iso-C3D versus fluoroscopy-based navigated retrograde drilling of osteochondral lesions: a pilot study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(3):323–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Richter M, Geerling J, Zech S, Goesling T, Krettek C. Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging with a motorized mobile C-arm (SIREMOBIL ISO-C-3D) in foot and ankle trauma care: a preliminary report. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19:259–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Holly LT, Foley KT. Percutaneous placement of posterior cervical screws using three-dimensional fluoroscopy. Spine. 2006;31:536–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Summers LE, Kouri JG, Yang M, Patrick Jacob R. Odontoid screw placement using isocentric 3-dimensional C-arm fluoroscopy. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21:45–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Patel VV, Dwyer A, Estes S, Burger E. Intraoperative 3-dimensional reconstructed multiplanar fluoroscopic imaging for immediate evaluation of spinal decompression. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21:209–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giachino AA, Cheng M. Irradiation of the surgeon during pinning of femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1980;62-B(2):227–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Riley SA. Radiation exposure from fluoroscopy during orthopedic surgical procedures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:257–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehlman CT, DiPasquale TG. Radiation exposure to the orthopaedic surgical team during fluoroscopy: “how far away is far enough?”. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:392–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller ME, Davis ML, MacClean CR, Davis JG, Smith BL, Humphries JR. Radiation exposure and associated risks to operating-room personnel during use of fluoroscopic guidance for selected orthopaedic surgical procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65(1):1–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Theocharopoulos N, Perisinakis K, Damilakis J, Papadokostakis G, Hadjipavlou A, Gourtsoyiannis N. Occupational exposure from common fluoroscopic projections used in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;89-A(9):1698–703.

    Google Scholar 

  14. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):81–100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Siriraj Research Development Fund.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Riansuwan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tharmviboonsri, T., Riansuwan, K., Nitising, A. et al. Radiation exposure during 3D fluoroscopy of the knee: an experimental study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 38, 307–311 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-011-0165-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-011-0165-7

Keywords

Navigation