Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Emergency thoracotomies in the largest trauma center in Denmark: 10 years’ experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

The aim of our study was to investigate the outcome in terms of 30-day survival and to determine whether preoperative factors could predict the outcome.

Methods

All patients who underwent an emergency thoracotomy (ET) during the period 2000 to 2009 were included. The patients were divided into two groups: emergency department thoracotomy and operating room thoracotomy. Data on demographics, mechanism of injury, intraoperative data, Injury Severity Scores (ISS), probability of survival, signs of life, transportation time, indications, and outcome were collected.

Results

Forty-four ETs were performed. The mechanisms of injury were penetrating in 28 (64%) and blunt in 16 (36%) cases. In the emergency department thoracotomy group, the survival was 45 versus 20% for penetrating and blunt trauma, respectively. The total survival was 33%. In the operating room thoracotomy group, the survival was 83%. The survivors had a significantly lower ISS and a higher calculated probability of survival. The calculated mean probability of survival was 44 and 84% in the emergency department thoracotomy and operating room thoracotomy groups, respectively. The actual survival was similar, with 33% in the emergency department thoracotomy group and 83% in the operating room thoracotomy group.

Conclusions

The probability of survival and ISS are good predictors of survival in these patients and should be included in the future in order to make upcoming studies easier to compare. Patients with very high ISS or low probability of survival survived, justifying the procedure in our center.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Working Group, Ad Hoc Subcommittee on Outcomes, American College of Surgeons, Committee on Trauma. Practice management guidelines for emergency department thoracotomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193:303–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hopson LR, Hirsh E, Delgado J, Domeier RM, Krohmer J, McSwain NE Jr, Weldon C, Friel M, Hoyt DB. Guidelines for withholding or termination of resuscitation in prehospital traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196:475–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Meredith JW, Hoth JJ. Thoracic trauma: when and how to intervene. Surg Clin North Am. 2007;87:95–118, vii.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rhee PM, Acosta J, Bridgeman A, Wang D, Jordan M, Rich N. Survival after emergency department thoracotomy: review of published data from the past 25 years. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190:288–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Søreide K, Petrone P, Asensio JA. Emergency thoracotomy in trauma: rationale, risks, and realities. Scand J Surg. 2007;96:4–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rashid MA, Wikström T, Ortenwall P. Cardiac injuries: a ten-year experience. Eur J Surg. 2000;166:18–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rashid MA, Wikström T, Ortenwall P. Outcome of lung trauma. Eur J Surg. 2000;166:22–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rashid MA, Wikström T, Ortenwall P. Thoracic vascular injuries: a major problem in trauma. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2001;35:285–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Søreide K, Søiland H, Lossius HM, Vetrhus M, Søreide JA, Søreide E. Resuscitative emergency thoracotomy in a Scandinavian trauma hospital—is it justified? Injury. 2007;38:34–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pahle AS, Pedersen BL, Skaga NO, Pillgram-Larsen J. Emergency thoracotomy saves lives in a Scandinavian hospital setting. J Trauma. 2010;68:599–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974;14:187–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS. Injury severity scoring again. J Trauma. 1995;38:94–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boyd CR, Tolson MA, Copes WS. Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score. J Trauma. 1987;27:370–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hunt PA, Greaves I, Owens WA. Emergency thoracotomy in thoracic trauma—a review. Injury. 2006;37:1–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jurkovich GJ, Esposito TJ, Maier RV. Resuscitative thoracotomy performed in the operating room. Am J Surg. 1992;163:463–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Seamon MJ, Fisher CA, Gaughan JP, Kulp H, Dempsey DT, Goldberg AJ. Emergency department thoracotomy: survival of the least expected. World J Surg. 2008;32:604–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schnüriger B, Inaba K, Branco BC, Salim A, Russell K, Lam L, Plurad D, Demetriades D. Organ donation: an important outcome after resuscitative thoracotomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211:450–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Kandler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kandler, K., Konge, L., Rafiq, S. et al. Emergency thoracotomies in the largest trauma center in Denmark: 10 years’ experience. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 38, 151–156 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-011-0138-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-011-0138-x

Keywords

Navigation