Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The 2001 World Trade Center Disaster: Summary and Evaluation of Experiences

  • Focus on Disaster and Military Medicine
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives:

To collect and analyze data from deaths and injuries, and from evaluation of the responses by medical services and by fire, rescue, and police services 1 year after the terror attack on World Trade Center.

Methodology:

Epidemiologic data were collected from all involved agencies and analyzed. The authors personal experience from working at the scene during the event and several other personal testimonies were also included in this analysis.

Results:

Totally 2,762 death certificates were issued by the state of New York for victims of the terror attack. 1,361 (49.9%) of these were issued for victims whose remains could not be identified. All but nine of these victims died at the day of the attack. 77% of the victims were male, medium age 39 years. Of the dead were 342 fire fighters and paramedics and 60 police officers. A total of 1,103 patients were treated during the first 48 days in five key hospitals receiving the majority of the injured. 29% of these were rescue workers. 66% of the injured were male, average age 39 years. The most common injuries were respiratory impairment (49%) and ocular affection (26%), many severe. The most common trauma was lacerations (14%) and sprains (14%). Of those administered to hospital, 19% had trauma and 19% burns. Head injuries were registered in 6% and crush injuries in 4%. With regard to response from involved agencies, communication failure was the most common and difficulties in command operations and scene control were also prevalent.

Conclusions:

The difficulties encountered were very similar to those commonly seen in major accidents or disasters, although on a great scale. Response plans have to be critically reviewed based on the experiences from this and other events, in order to pre-empt difficulties such as those described here in future responses to major urban accidents and disasters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Galveston disaster. Infoplease.com [website]. Available at: http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0005351.html. Accessed 12/9/2002.

  2. Naudet J (2002) World Trade Center Disaster.

  3. Giuliani RJ. Leadership. New York: Miramax Books, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Personal communication. Gestring, Brian. Forensic Scientist, NYC Medical examiners office. New York, November 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Death Certificates for WTC disaster. New York: Office of Vital Statistics, New York City Department of Health, 2002.

  6. Anonymous. Rapid assesment of injuries among the survivors of the terrorist attack on the world trade center - New York City, September 2001. Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep (MMWR) 2002; 51:1–5

  7. FDNY Deaths. New York Times online. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/library/national/091101rescuers.html. Accessed 11/22/2002.

  8. PAPD Deaths. Available at: http://www.wtcpapdmemorial.com/heroes.htm. Accessed 11/22/2002.

  9. NYPD Deaths. Available at: http://www.nyc.gov/html/nypd/html/memorial_01.html. Accessed 11/22/2002.

  10. Westfeldt A. Terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center cost NYC $33 billion to $36 billion, experts say. Associated Press 11/16/2002.

  11. Smith D. Report from ground zero. New York: Penguin Putnam, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith D. Report from ground zero. New York: Penguin Putnam, 2002:12.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith D. Report from ground zero. New York: Penguin Putnam, 2002:24.

    Google Scholar 

  14. VanEssen T. Strong of heart. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  15. VanEssen T. Strong of heart. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2002:19.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smith D. Report from ground zero. New York: Penguin Putnam, 2002:162.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smith D. Report from ground zero. New York: Penguin Putnam, 2002:183.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smith D. Report from ground zero. New York: Penguin Putnam, 2002:28.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Glanz J, Lipton E. Towers fell as intense fire beat defenses, report says. New York Times 3/29/2002:A14.

  20. Eagar TW, Musso C. Why did the World Trade Center collapse? Science, engineering, and speculation. JOM: J Min Metals Mater Soc 2002; 53(12).

  21. NOVA. Why the towers fell. Available at: http://www.pbs.org/nova/wtc.

  22. Smith D. Report from ground zero. New York: Penguin Putnam, 2002:160.

    Google Scholar 

  23. VanEssen T. Strong of heart. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2002:54.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Company M. Report on the Fire Department response to the World Trade Center disaster [Website]. Available at: http://www.nyc.gov/html/fdny/html/mck_report/toc.html. Accessed 12/9/2002.

  25. Mckinsey & Company. A report on the FDNY response to the World Trade Center Attack. New York, 2002.

  26. Mckinsey & Company. A report on the FDNY response to the World Trade Center Attack. New York, 2002:48.

  27. Pryor JP. Personal observations. 9/11/2001.

  28. Nierenberg R. Reflections. September 11 — what we learned. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Menlove S. Reflections. September 11 — what we learned. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hirshberg A, Holcomb G, Mattox K. Hospital trauma care in multiple casualty incidents: a critical review. Ann Emerg Med 1996;28:136–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Scheibner A. World Trade Center perspective from a Manhattan emergency medicine resident. Ann Emerg Med 2002;39:9–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Frykberg E, TepasJr. Terrorist bombings: lessons learned from Belfast to Beirut. Ann Surg. 1998;208:569–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Feliciano D, Anderson GJ, Rozycki G. Management of casualties from the bombing at the centennial Olympics. Am J Surg 1998;176:538–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mallonee S, Shariat S, Stennies G, Waxweiler R, Hogan D, Jordan F. Physical injuries and fatalities resulting from the Oklahoma City Bombing. JAMA 1996;276:382–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Barrie P. World Trade Center attack. Paper presented at trauma and critical care. Point/counterpoint XXI syllabus, 2002, Atlantic City, New Jersey.

  36. VanEssen T. Strong of heart. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2002:34.

    Google Scholar 

  37. VanEssen T. Strong of heart. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2002:26.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mckinsey & Company. A report on the FDNY response to the World Trade Center Attack. New York, 2002:29.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Traumatology and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    John P. Pryor

Authors
  1. John P. Pryor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

† John P. Pryor was killed during his work in Iraq on Christmas Day 2008.

Received: September 25, 2002; revision accepted: November 27, 2002 First Published in Int J Disaster Medicine 2003;1:56–68; Published Online: June 1, 2009

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pryor, J.P. The 2001 World Trade Center Disaster: Summary and Evaluation of Experiences. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 35, 212–224 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-009-9902-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-009-9902-6

Key Words

Search

Navigation