Abstract
Introduction:
Preparation is essential to cope with the challenge of providing optimal care when there is a sudden, unexpected surge of casualties due to a disaster or major incident. By definition, the requirements of such cases exceed the standard care facilities of hospitals in qualitative or quantitative respects and interfere with the care of regular patients. To meet the growing demands to be prepared for disasters, a permanent facility to provide structured, prepared relief in such situations was developed.
Methods:
A permanent but reserved Major Incident Hospital (MIH) has been developed through cooperation between a large academic medical institution, a trauma center, a military hospital, and the National Poison Information Centre (NVIC). The infrastructure, organization, support systems, training and systematic working methods of the MIH are designed to create order in a chaotic, unexpected situation and to optimize care and logistics in any possible scenario. Focus points are: patient flow and triage, registration, communication, evaluation and training. Research and the literature are used to identify characteristic pitfalls due to the chaos associated with and the unexpected nature of disasters, and to adapt our organization.
Results:
At the MIH, the exceptional has become the core business, and preparation for disaster and large-scale emergency care is a daily occupation. An Emergency Response Protocol enables admittance to the normally dormant hospital of up to 100 (in exceptional cases even 300) patients after a start-up time of only 15 min. The Patient Barcode Registration System (PBR) with EAN codes guarantees quick and adequate registration of patient data in order to facilitate good medical coordination and follow-up during a major incident.
Discussion:
The fact that the hospital is strictly reserved for this type of care guarantees availability and minimizes impact on normal care. When it is not being used during a major incident, there is time to address training and research. Collaboration with the NVIC and infrastructural adjustments enable us to not only care for patients with physical trauma, but also to provide centralized care of patients under quarantine conditions for, say, MRSA, SARS, smallpox, chemical or biological hazards. Triage plays an important role in medical disaster management and is therefore key to organization and infrastructure. Caps facilitate role distribution and recognizibility. The PBR resulted in more accurate registration and real-time availability of patient and group information. Infrastructure and a plan is not enough; training, research and evaluation are necessary to continuously work on disaster preparedness.
Conclusion:
The MIH in Utrecht (Netherlands) is a globally unique facility that can provide immediate emergency care for multiple casualties under exceptional circumstances. Resulting from the cooperation between a large academic medical institution, a trauma center, a military hospital and the NVIC, the MIH offers not only a good and complete infrastructure but also the expertise required to provide large-scale emergency care during disasters and major incidents.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lennquist S. Education and training in disaster medicine. Scand J Surg 2005;94:300–10.
Frykberg ER. Medical management of disasters and mass casualties from terrorist bombings: how can we cope? J Trauma 2002;53:201–12.
Chan TC, Killeen J, Griswold W, Lenert L. Information technology and emergency medical care during disasters. Acad Emerg Med 2004;11:1229–36.
Bouman JH, Schouwerwou RJ, Van der Eijk KJ, van Leusden AJ, Savelkoul TJ. Computerization of patient tracking and tracing during mass casualty incidents. Eur J Emerg Med 2000;7:211–16.
Noordergraaf GJ, Bouman JH, van den Brink EJ, van de Pompe C, Savelkoul TJ. Development of computer-assisted patient control for use in the hospital setting during mass casualty incidents. Am J Emerg Med 1996;14:257–61.
Baker MS. Creating order from chaos: part II: tactical planning for mass casualty and disaster response at definitive care facilities. Mil Med 2007;172:237–43.
Marres GMH, de Lange D, Leenen LPH, Hoepelman AIM. Woundinfections in repatriated survivors of the Tsunami disaster. Wounds 2006;18:92–100.
Zimering R, Gulliver SB, Knight J, Munroe J, Keane TM. Post-traumatic stress disorder in disaster relief workers following direct and indirect trauma exposure to Ground Zero. J Trauma Stress 2006;19:553–7.
American College of Surgeons. Statement on the disaster and mass casualty management. Bull Am College Surgeons 2003;88.
Kaiser AM, Schultsz C, Kruithof GJ, Debets-Ossenkopp Y, Vandenbroucke-Grauls C. Carriage of resistant microorganisms in repatriates from foreign hospitals to The Netherlands. Clin Microbiol Infect 2004;10:972–9.
Frykberg ER, Tepas JJIII. Terrorist bombings. Lessons learned from Belfast to Beirut. Ann Surg 1988;208:569–76.
Sklar DP. Disaster planning and organization. Casualty patterns in disasters. JW Assn Emerg Disas Med 1987;3:49–51.
Klein JS, Wiegelt JA. Disaster management. Lessons learned. Surgical Clin N Am 1991;71:257–66.
Baker MS. Creating order from chaos: part I: triage, initial care, and tactical considerations in mass casualty and disaster response. Mil Med 2007;172:232–6.
Hirshberg A, Holcomb JB, Mattox KL. Hospital trauma care in multiple-casualty incidents: a critical view. Ann Emerg Med 2001;37:647–52.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marres, G., Bemelman, M., van der Eijk, J. et al. Major Incident Hospital: Development of a Permanent Facility for Management of Incident Casualties. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 35, 203–211 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-009-8230-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-009-8230-1