Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Association between acute histopathological changes of rectal walls and late radiation proctitis following radiotherapy for prostate cancer+

Assoziation zwischen akuten histopathologischen Veränderungen der Rektumwände und einer späten radiogenen Proktitis nach Strahlentherapie des Prostatakarzinoms

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 09 December 2020

Abstract

Purpose

The impact of acute histopathological changes (HC) of the rectum on development of late clinical proctitis (LCP) after external radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer is poorly explored and was the primary end point of this prospective study.

Methods

In 70 patients, 15 HC of early rectal biopsies after RT were identified, whereby RT was conventional 2D RT in 41 cases and conformational 3D RT in 29. Associations of HC in anterior and posterior rectal walls (ARW, PRW) with LCP, acute endoscopic (AEP) and acute clinical proctitis (ACP) were statistically evaluated considering as explicative variables the patient general characteristics and the HC.

Results

The mean patients’ follow-up was 123.5 months (24–209). The median prostatic dose was 72 Gy (2 Gy/fraction). For the 41 and 29 patients the ARW and PRW doses were 64 and 49 Gy vs. 63 and 50 Gy, respectively. The incidence of LCP ≥ grade 2 at 10 years was 12.9%. The univariate (p = 0.02) and Kaplan–Meyer methods (p = 0.007) showed that the gland (or crypts) loss in the ARW was significantly associated with LCP. AEP and ACP occurred in 14.3 and 55.7% of cases. At multivariate level AEP significantly correlated with hemorrhoids (p = 0.014) and neutrophilia in ARW (p = 0.042).

Conclusions

Early after RT, substantial gland loss in ARW is predictive of LCP. To reduce this complication with conventional fractionation, we suggest keeping the mean dose to ARW ≤48–52 Gy.

Zusammenfassung

Zielsetzung

Der Einfluss akuter histopathologischer Veränderungen (HV) des Rektums auf die Entwicklung einer späten klinischen Proktitis (SKP) nach perkutaner Strahlentherapie (RT) des Prostatakarzinoms ist kaum untersucht und war primärer Endpunkt dieser prospektiven Studie.

Methoden

Bei 70 Patienten wurden 15 HV in frühen Biopsien des Rektums nach RT identifiziert, wobei 41 Patienten mit einer konventionellen 2‑D- und 29 Patienten mit einer 3‑D-konformalen Technik bestrahlt wurden. Die Assoziationen von HV in den anterioren und posterioren Rektumwänden (ARW, PRW) mit SKP, akuter endoskopischer (AEP) und akuter klinischer Proktitis (AKP) wurden statistisch evaluiert, wobei die allgemeinen Eigenschaften der Patienten und die HV als erklärende Variablen herangezogen wurden.

Ergebnisse

Das durchschnittliche Follow-up betrug 123,5 Monate (24–209 Monate). Die mediane Prostatagesamtdosis lag bei 72 Gy (2 Gy/Fraktion). Für die 41 bzw. 29 Patienten betrugen die ARW- und PRW-Dosis 64 und 49 Gy bzw. 63 und 50 Gy. Die Inzidenzrate von SKP ≥ Grad 2 nach 10 Jahren war 12,9 %. Die univariate Analyse (p = 0,02) und der Kaplan-Meier-Test (p = 0,007) zeigten, dass ein Verlust von Drüsen (oder Krypten) im Bereich der ARW signifikant mit der SKP korrelierte. AEP und AKP ereigneten sich in 14,3 bzw. 55,7 % der Fälle. In der multivariaten Analyse korrelierten AEP statistisch signifikant mit Hämorrhoiden (p = 0,014) und Neutrophilie in ARW (p = 0,042).

Schlussfolgerungen

Früh nach der RT ist ein erheblicher Verlust an Drüsen im Bereich der ARW prädiktiv für eine SKP. Um diese Komplikation bei konventioneller Fraktionierung zu vermeiden, empfehlen wir, im Bereich der ARW die mittlere Dosis im Bereich der ARW ≤48–52 Gy zu halten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoffman KE, Voong KR, Pugh TJ, Skinner H, Levy LB, Takiar V et al (2014) Risk of late toxicity in men receiving dose-escalated hypofractionated intensity modulated prostate radiation therapy: results from a randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88:1074–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aluwini S, Pos F, Schimmel E, Krol S, van der Toorn PP, de Jager H et al (2016) Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer (HYPRO): late toxicity results from a randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 17:464–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dearnaley D, Syndikus I, Mossop H, Khoo V, Birtle A, Bloomfield D et al (2016) Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5‑year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial. Lancet Oncol 17:1047–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arcangeli G, Saracino B, Arcangeli S, Gomellini S, Petrongari MG, Sanguineti G et al (2017) Moderate hypofractionation in high-risk, organ-confined prostate cancer: final results of a phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 35:1891–1897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Onjukka E, Fiorino C, Cicchetti A, Palorini F, Improta I, Gagliardi G et al (2019) Patterns in ano-rectal dose maps and the risk of late toxicity after prostate IMRT. Acta Oncol 12:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hoffman KE, Voong KR, Levy LB, Allen PK, Choi S, Schlembach PJ et al (2018) Randomized trial of hypofractionated, dose-escalated, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) versus conventionally fractionated IMRT for localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 36:2943–2949

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Catton CN, Lukka H, Gu CS, Martin JM, Supiot S, Chung PWM et al (2017) Randomized trial of a hypofractionated radiation regimen for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 35:1884–1890

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bolzicco G, Favretto MS, Satariano N, Scremin E, Tambone C, Tasca A (2013) A single-center study of 100 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. BMC Urol 13:49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Musunuru HB, Quon H, Davidson M, Cheung P, Zhang L, D’Alimonte L et al (2016) Dose-escalation of five-fraction SABR in prostate cancer: toxicity comparison of two prospective trials. Radiother Oncol 118:112–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Paleny R, Bremer M, Walacides D, Mainwaring S, Weber K, Henkenberens C (2019) Comparison of relative and absolute rectal dose-volume parameters and clinical correlation with acute and late radiation proctitis in prostate cancer patients. Strahlenther Onkol 195:103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Michalsky JF, Gay H, Jackson A, Tucker SL, Deasy JO (2010) Radiation dose-volume effects in radiation-induced rectal injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76(3 Suppl):S123–S129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grodsky MB, Sidani SM (2015) Radiation proctopathy. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 28:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Campostrini F, Musola R, Marchiaro G, Lonardi F, Verlato G (2013) Role of early proctoscopy in predicting late symptomatic proctitis after external radiation therapy for prostate carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85:1031–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Reddy EK, Giri S, Mansfield CM (1984) External radiation therapy of localized prostatic cancer. J Natl Med Assoc 76:61–66

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Dewit L, van der Schueren E (1984) Radiation treatment planning for the localized prostatic carcinoma: methods and rationale. Strahlentherapie 8:474–484

    Google Scholar 

  16. Campostrini F, Garusi G, Donati E (1995) A practical technique for conformal simulation in radiation therapy of pelvic tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 15:355–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pollack A, Zagars GK, Starkschall G, Childress CH, Kopplin S, Boyer AL et al (1996) Conventional vs. conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary results of dosimetry and acute toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 34:555–564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wachter S, Gerstner N, Goldner G, Pötzi R, Wambersie A, Pötter R (2000) Endoscopic scoring of late rectal mucosa damage after conformal radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 54:11–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hanauer SB, Robinson M, Pruitt R, Lazenby AJ, Persson T, Nilsson LG et al (1998) Budesonide enema for the treatment of active, distal ulcerative colitis and proctitis: a dose-ranging study. U.S. Budesonide enema study group. Gastroenterology 115:525–532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hovdenak N, Fajardo LF, Hauer Jensen M (2000) Acute radiation proctitis: a sequential clinicopathologic study during pelvic radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 48:1111–1117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Leupin N, Curschmann J, Kranzbühler H, Maurer CA, Laissue JA, Mazzucchelli L (2002) Acute radiation colitis in patients treated with short-term preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 26:498–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF (1995) Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31:1341–1346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Crespi M, Delvaux M, Schaprio M, Venables C, Zwiebel F (1996) Working Party Report by the Committee for Minimal Standards of Terminology and Documentation in Digestive Endoscopy of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Minimal standard terminology for a computerized endoscopic database. Ad hoc Task Force of the Committee. Am J Gastroenterol 91:191–216

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wolff D, Stieler F, Welzel G, Lorenz F, Abo-Madyan Y, Mai S et al (2009) Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) vs. serial tomotherapy, step-and-shoot IMRT and 3D-conformal RT for treatment of prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 93:226–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gelfand MD, Tepper M, Katz LA, Binder HJ, Yesner R, Floch MH (1968) Acute irradiation proctitis in man. Development of eosinophilic crypt abscesses. Gastroenterology 1:401–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tepper M, Vidone RA, Hayes MA, Lindenmuth WW, Kligerman MM (1968) Preoperative irradiation in rectal cancer: initial comparison of clinical tolerance, surgical and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 102:587–595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Weisbrot IM, Liber AF, Gordon BS (1975) The effects of therapeutic radiation on colonic mucosa. Cancer 36:931–940

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Haboubi NY, Schofield PF, Rowland PL (1988) The light and electron microscopic features of early and late phase radiation-induced proctitis. Am J Gastroenterol 83:1140–1144

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sedgwick DM, Howard GCW, Ferguson A (1994) Pathogenesis of acute radiation injury to the rectum. A prospective study in patients. Int J Colorect Dis 9:23–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Karamanolis G, Delladetsima I, Kouloulias V, Papaxoinis K, Panayiotides I, Haldeopoulos D et al (2013) Increased expression of VEGF and CD31 in postradiation rectal tissue: implications for radiation proctitis. Mediators Inflamm. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/515048

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Richter KK, Wang J, Fagerhol MK, Hauer-Jensen M (2001) Radiation-induced granulocyte transmigration predicts development of delayed structural changes in rat intestine. Radiother Oncol 59:81–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gulliford SL, Foo K, Morgan RC, Aird EG, Bidmead AM, Critchley H et al (2010) Dose-volume constraints to reduce rectal side effects from prostate radiotherapy: evidence from MRC RT01 Trial ISRCTN 47772397. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:747–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Smit WG, Helle PA, van Putten WL, Wijnmaalen AJ, Seldenrath JJ, van der Werf-Messing BH (1990) Late radiation damage in prostate cancer patients treated by high dose external radiotherapy in relation to rectal dose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 18:23–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zilli T, Jorcano S, Escudé L, Linero D, Rouzaud M, Dubouloz A et al (2011) Twice-weekly hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer with low-risk nodal involvement. Toxicity and outcome from a dose escalation pilot study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:382–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ren W, Sun C, Lu N, Xu Y, Han F, Liu YP et al (2016) Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. J Appl Clin Med Phys 17:254–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Widmark A, Gunnlaugsson A, Beckman L, Thellenberg-Karlsson C, Hoyer M, Lagerlund M et al (2019) Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5‑year outcomes of the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet 394:385–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kittel JA, Reddy CA, Smith KL, Stephans KL, Tendulkar RD, Ulchaker J et al (2015) Long-term efficacy and toxicity of low-dose-rate 125I prostate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 92:884–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mendez LC, Morton GC (2018) High dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2018(7):357–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rodda S, Tyldesley S, Morris WJ, Keyes M, Halperin R, Pai H et al (2017) ASCENDE-RT: An Analysis of Treatment-Related Morbidity for a Randomized Trial Comparing a Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost with a Dose-Escalated External Beam Boost for High- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 8:286–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Franco Campostrini MD or Andrea Remo MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

F. Campostrini, A. Remo, L. Astati, M. Zorzi, G. Capodaglio, A. Buffoli, G. Moretti, B. Della Monica, C. Zanella and G. Verlato declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Campostrini, F., Remo, A., Astati, L. et al. Association between acute histopathological changes of rectal walls and late radiation proctitis following radiotherapy for prostate cancer+. Strahlenther Onkol 196, 617–627 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-020-01590-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-020-01590-3

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation