Abstract
Purpose
This systematic review aimed to assess the effects of orthopedic functional appliances for anterior open bite (AOB) in primary or mixed dentition children.
Methods
A search for randomized controlled trials (RCT) was conducted in November 2020 in electronic databases with no data or language restrictions. Primary outcomes were skeletal cephalometric variables and adverse events. We used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool to assess methodological quality and the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence.
Results
We identified five RCTs (220 participants). Very low certainty evidence showed an improvement in overbite (mean difference [MD] 3.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.63–4.57) and in the angulation of the upper incisors to the palatal plane (MD 3.70; 95% CI 0.85–6.55) with Frankel’s functional regulator, compared to no treatment. There was no difference in the measured cephalometric variables when comparing removable palatal crib to fixed palatal crib, bonded spurs, and chin cup. When comparing removable versus magnetic bite blocks, a beneficial effect was observed in overbite, overjet, skeletal anteroposterior angular measurements, and skeletal vertical linear measures in the magnetic group. No adverse events were reported.
Conclusion
There was insufficient evidence to infer the effects of these treatments for AOB, and high-quality RCTs are needed to increase the estimated effects.
PROSPERO register
CRD42020175634, prospectively registered (05 July 2020).
Zusammenfassung
Zielsetzung
Ziel dieser systematischen Übersichtsarbeit war es, die Auswirkungen von funktionellen kieferorthopädischen Apparaturen zur Behandlung des frontal offenen Bisses (AOB) bei Kindern im Milchgebiss oder im Wechselgebiss zu untersuchen.
Methoden
Die Suche nach randomisierten kontrollierten Studien (RCTs) wurde im November 2020 in elektronischen Datenbanken ohne Daten- und Sprachbeschränkung durchgeführt. Primäre Outcomes waren skelettale kephalometrische Variablen und unerwünschte Ereignisse. Zur Bewertung der methodischen Qualität wurde das Cochrane „risk-of-bias tool“ verwendet, zur Bewertung der Verlässlichkeit der Evidenz der GRADE-Ansatz.
Ergebnisse
Wir identifizierten 5 RCTs (220 Teilnehmende). Die Evidenz mit sehr geringer Verlässlichkeit zeigte eine Verbesserung des Überbisses (mittlere Differenz [MD] 3,60; 95%-Konfidenzintervall [KI] 2,63‑4,57) und der Winkelung der oberen Schneidezähne zur Gaumenebene (MD 3,70; 95 % KI 0,85–6,55) mit dem Funktionsregler nach Fränkel im Vergleich zu keiner Behandlung. Es gab keinen Unterschied in den gemessenen kephalometrischen Variablen beim Vergleich der herausnehmbaren Gaumensegel mit den festsitzenden Gaumensegeln, den eingeklebten Spornen und der Kinnkappe. Beim Vergleich zwischen herausnehmbaren und magnetischen Aufbissstücken wurde in der magnetischen Gruppe ein positiver Effekt in Bezug auf Überbiss, Overjet, anteroposteriore skelettale Winkelmessungen und vertikale skelettale lineare Messungen beobachtet. Es wurden keine unerwünschten Ereignisse berichtet.
Schlussfolgerung
Es gab keine hinreichende Evidenz, um auf die Auswirkungen dieser Behandlungen auf die AOB zu schließen, und es sind hochwertige RCTs erforderlich, um die geschätzten Auswirkungen zu erhöhen.
PROSPERO-Register
CRD42020175634, prospektiv registriert (05. Juli 2020).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, Haugh MC, Henry D, Hill S, Jaeschke R, Leng G, Liberati A, Magrini N, Mason J, Middleton P, Mrukowicz J, O’Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schünemann HJ, Edejer T, Varonen H, Vist GE, Williams JW Jr, Zaza S, GRADE Working Group (2004) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328(7454):1490. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490
Björk A, Skieller V (1983) Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod 5(1):1–46
Brignardello-Petersen R (2020) Treating anterior open bite with a fixed palatal crib in children aged 8 to 10 years probably results in an important improvement in oral health-related quality of life. J Am Dent Assoc 151(3):e24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2019.10.006
Carvalho AC, Paiva SM, Scarpelli AC, Viegas CM, Ferreira FM, Pordeus IA (2011) Prevalence of malocclusion in primary dentition in a population-based sample of Brazilian preschool children. Eur J Paediatr Dent 12(2):107–111
Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Mucedero M (2007) Comparison of 2 early treatment protocols for open-bite malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132(6):743–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.045
Doshi UH, Bhad-Patil WA (2010) Early management of skeletal open bite with spring-loaded and magnetic bite blocks. World J Orthod 11(2):107–116
Erbay E, Uğur T, Ulgen M (1995) The effects of Frankel’s function regulator (FR-4) therapy on the treatment of angle class I skeletal anterior open bite malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108(1):9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70061-7
Feres MF, Abreu LG, Insabralde NM, de Almeida MR, Flores-Mir C (2017) Effectiveness of open bite correction when managing deleterious oral habits in growing children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 39(1):31–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjw005
Ferreira FPC, Almeida RR, Torres FC, Pedrin RRA, Almeida MR, Santana Filho R (2012) Evaluation of the stability of open bite treatment using a removable appliance with palatal crib combined with high-pull chincup. Dental Press J Orthod 17(6):52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.035
Giuntini V, Franchi L, Baccetti T, Mucedero M, Cozza P (2008) Dentoskeletal changes associated with fixed and removable appliances with a crib in open-bite patients in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133(1):77–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.012
GRADEpro GDT (2015) GRADEpro guideline development tool [software]. McMaster University, Hamilton (Available from gradepro.org)
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (2019) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, 2nd edn. Willey,
Kiliaridis S, Egermark I, Thilander B (1990) Anterior open bite treatment with magnets. Eur J Orthod 12(4):447–457
Kuster R, Ingervall B (1992) The effect of treatment of skeletal open bite with two types of bite-blocks. Eur J Orthod 14(6):489–499. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/14.6.489
Lentini-Oliveira D, Carvalho FR, Qingsong Y, Junjie L, Saconato H, Machado MA, Prado LB, Prado GF (2014) Orthodontic and orthopaedic treatment for anterior open bite in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD5515. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005515.pub3
Machado DB, Brizon VS, Ambrosano GM, Madureira DF, Gomes VE, de Oliveira AC (2014) Factors associated with the prevalence of anterior open bite among preschool children: a population-based study in Brazil. Dental Press J Orthod 19(5):103–109. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.5.103-109.oar
Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG (2010) CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. BMJ 340:c869. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A (2016) Rayyan‑a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 5(1):210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pedrin F, Almeida MR, Almeida RR, Almeida-Pedrin RR, Torres F (2006) A prospective study of the treatment effects of a removable appliance with palatal crib combined with high-pull chincup therapy in anterior open-bite patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129(3):418–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.035
Piassi E, Antunes LS, Graça TCA, Antunes LAA (2019) The impact of mixed dentition malocclusion on the oral health-related quality of life for children and their families: a case-control study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 43(3):211–217. https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4625-43.3.12
Pisani L, Bonaccorso L, Fastuca R, Spena R, Lombardo L, Caprioglio A (2016) Systematic review for orthodontic and orthopedic treatments for anterior open bite in the mixed dentition. Prog Orthod 17(1):28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0142-0
Pithon MM, Magno MB, da Silva Coqueiro R, de Paiva SM, Marques LS, Paranhus LR, Tanaka OM, Maia LC (2019) Oral health-related quality of life of children before, during, and after anterior open bite correction: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 156(3):303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.04.022
Ramos-Jorge J, Motta T, Marques LS, Paiva SM, Ramos-Jorge ML (2015) Association between anterior open bite and impact on quality of life of preschool children. Braz Oral Res 29:46. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0046
Reichert I, Figel P, Winchester L (2014) Orthodontic treatment of anterior open bite: a review article—Is surgery always necessary? Oral Maxillofac Surg 18(3):271–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-013-0430-5
Restrepo C, Santamaría A, Peláez S, Tapias A (2011) Oropharyngeal airway dimensions after treatment with functional appliances in class II retrognathic children. J Oral Rehabil 38(8):588–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02199.x
Rijpstra C, Lisson JA (2016) Etiology of anterior open bite: a review. J Orofac Orthop 77(4):281–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-016-0029-1
Rossato PH, Fernandes TMF, Urnau FDA, de Castro AC, Conti F, de Almeida RR, Oltramari-Navarro PVP (2018) Dentoalveolar effects produced by different appliances on early treatment of anterior open bite: a randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod 88(6):684–691. https://doi.org/10.2319/101317-691.1
Silvestrini-Biavati A, Salamone S, Silvestrini-Biavati F, Agostino P, Ugolini A (2016) Anterior open-bite and sucking habits in Italian preschool children. Eur J Paediatr Dent 17:43–46
Slaviero T, Fernandes TM, Oltramari-Navarro PV, de Castro AC, Conti F, Poleti ML, de Almeida MR (2017) Dimensional changes of dental arches produced by fixed and removable palatal cribs: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Angle Orthod 87(2):215–222. https://doi.org/10.2319/060116-438.1
Tausche E, Luck O, Harzer W (2004) Prevalence of malocclusions in the early mixed dentition and orthodontic treatment need. Eur J Orthod 26(3):237–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/26.3.237
Torres F, Almeida RR, de Almeida MR, Almeida-Pedrin RR, Pedrin F, Henriques JF (2006) Anterior open bite treated with a palatal crib and high-pull chin cup therapy. A prospective randomized study. Eur J Orthod 28(6):610–617. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjl053
Torres FC, Almeida RR, Almeida-Pedrin RR, Pedrin F, Paranhos LR (2012) Dentoalveolar comparative study between removable and fixed cribs, associated to chincup, in anterior open bite treatment. J Appl Oral Sci 20(5):531–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjl053
Tsichlaki A, O’Brien K, Benson PE, Marshman Z, Johal A, Colonio-Salazar FB, Harman NL, Fleming PS (2020) Development of a core outcome set for use in routine orthodontic clinical trials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 158(5):650–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.05.010
Funding
The authors declare that there are funding sources that support this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Elaine Marcílio Santos, Ana Luiza C Martimbianco and Carla Pecoraro, Anna Carolina RT Horliana. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Ana Luiza C Martimbianco, Caroline Moraes Moriyama and Sandra Kalil Bussadori, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
E. Marcílio Santos, S. Kalil Bussadori, A.C. Ratto Tempestini Horliana, C. Moraes Moriyama, L. Jansiski Motta, C. Pecoraro and A.L. Cabrera Martimbianco declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical standards
Ethics approval: Not applicable. Consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Availability of data and material
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Supplementary Information
Supplemental table 1. Search strategies for each electronic database
Supplemental table 2. Risk of bias judgements for each domain.
Supplemental table 3. Summary of findings tables (GRADE approach) for the main comparison.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marcílio Santos, E., Kalil Bussadori, S., Ratto Tempestini Horliana, A.C. et al. Functional orthopedic treatment for anterior open bite in children. A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. J Orofac Orthop 84, 405–414 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-022-00388-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-022-00388-5
Keywords
- Orthodontic appliances, functional
- Malocclusion
- Cephalometry
- Evidence-based dentistry
- Frankel function regulator