Abstract
Aims
The purpose of this study was to compare pharyngeal airway linear measurements of untreated skeletal Class II subjects with low-, neutral- and high-angle facial patterns and a skeletal Class I control group of postadolescent girls.
Methods
We enrolled 50 postadolescent girls in this study. The Class II,1 cohort included subjects presenting ANB angles greater than 4°. Subjects were categorized as belonging to one of three different rotation models: high, neutral and low angles. ANOVA and Duncan’s tests were used to identify differences within and among groups (p<0.05).
Results
Pharyngeal airway measurements were significantly smaller (p<0.05) in the high-angle Class II group. In addition, the narrowest linear measurements of the oropharynx (ph-pph) were also smaller in the high-angle Class II group (p=0.055). Soft palate thickness (sp1-sp2) was significantly greater (p<0.05) in the low-angle Class II group.
Conclusion
That smaller airway measurements in only the high-angle Class II subjects were noted confirms an association between pharyngeal airway measurements and a vertical skeletal pattern. However, we could not ascertain that a sagittal jaw relationship had an effect on airway space.
Zusammenfassung
Studienziele
Gegenstand dieser Studie waren die Atemwegsweiten im Rachen unbehandelter postadoleszenter Patientinnen mit skeletaler Klasse-II-Anomalie bei unterschiedlichen fazialen Mustern gegenüber einer Klasse-I-Kontrollgruppe.
Methode
Die Studie umfasste 50 postadoleszente Mädchen, wobei jene in der Klasse-II/1-Kohorte einen ANB-Winkel >4° aufwiesen und je nach Winkel der Unterkieferebene einem schwach, neutral oder stark geneigten Rotationstyp zugeordnet wurden. Per Varianzanalyse und Duncan-Test wurden gruppeninterne und gruppenübergreifende Unterschiede ermittelt (p<0,05).
Resultate
Die neigungsstarke Klasse-II-Untergruppe zeigte signifikant kleinere Rachenweiten als alle anderen Gruppen (p<0,05). Auch die engste Stelle im Oropharynx (ph-pph) war in dieser Gruppe deutlich am schmalsten (p=0,055). Die Stärke des weichen Gaumens (sp1–sp2) lag in der neigungsschwachen Klasse-II-Gruppe signifikant über den Werten in allen anderen Gruppen (p<0,05).
Schlussfolgerung
Unser Befund kleinerer Atemwegsweiten in den neigungsstarken Klasse-II-Fällen gegenüber allen anderen Gruppen bestätigt, dass zwischen Rachenweiten und vertikalen Wachstumsmustern ein Zusammenhang besteht. Einen Einfluss der sagittalen Kieferrelation auf die Atemwegsweiten verzeichneten wir nicht.
References
Aboudara C, Nielsen I, Huang JC et al (2009) Comparison of airway space with conventional lateral headfilms and 3-dimensional reconstruction from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135:468–479
Aboudara CA, Hatcher D, Nielsen IL, Miller A (2003) A three-dimensional evaluation of the upper airway in adolescents. Orthod Craniofac Res 6:173–175
Abramson Z, Susarla S, August M et al (2010) Three-dimensional computed tomographic analysis of airway anatomy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:354–362
Abramson Z, Susarla S, Troulis M, Kaban L (2009) Age-related changes of the upper airway assessed by 3-dimensional computed tomography. J Craniofac Surg 20:657–663
Akcam MO, Toygar TU, Wada T (2002) Longitudinal investigation of soft palate and nasopharyngeal airway relations in different rotation types. Angle Orthod 72:521–526
Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr (2005) The cervical vertebral maturation method for the identification of optimal treatment timing. Semin Orthod 11:119–129
Celikoglu M, Akpinar S, Yavuz I (2010) The pattern of malocclusion in a sample of orthodontic patients from Turkey. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 15:e791–e796
Ceylan I, Oktay H (1995) A study on the pharyngeal size in different skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108:69–75
Daniel MM, Lorenzi MC, Costa Leite C da, Lorenzi-Filho G (2007) Pharyngeal dimensions in healthy men and women. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 62:5–10
De Freitas MR, Alcazar NM, Janson G et al (2006) Upper and lower pharyngeal airways in subjects with Class I and Class II malocclusions and different growth patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:742–745
Gábris K, Márton S, Madléna M (2006) Prevalence of malocclusions in Hungarian adolescents. Eur J Orthod 28:467–470
Jena KA, Singh PS, Utreja AK (2010) Sagittal mandibular development effects on the dimensions of the awake pharyngeal airway passage. Angle Orthod 80:1061–1067
Johnston CD, Richardson A (1999) Cephalometric changes in adult pharyngeal morphology. Eur J Orthod 21:357–362
Joseph AA, Elbaum J, Cisneros GJ, Eisig SB (1998) A cephalometric comparative study of the soft tissue airway dimensions in persons with hyperdivergent and normodivergent facial patterns. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56:135–139
Kim YJ, Hong JS, Hwang YI, Park YH (2010) Three-dimensional analysis of pharyngeal airway in preadolescent children with different anteroposterior skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:306, e1–e11
King EW (1952) A roentgenographic study of pharyngeal growth. Angle Orthod 22:23–37
Kirjavainen M, Kirjavainen T (2007) Upper airway dimensions in Class II malocclusion. Effects of headgear treatment. Angle Orthod 77:1046–1053
Kinzinger G, Czapka K, Ludwig B et al (2011) Effects of fixed appliances in correcting Angle Class II on the depth of the posterior airway space: FMA vs. Herbst appliance—a retrospective cephalometric study. J Orofac Orthop 72:301–320
Laine T, Warren DW (1991) Effects of age, gender, and body size on nasal cross-sectional area in children. Eur J Orthod 13:311–316
Lenza MG, Lenza MM, Dalstra M et al (2010) An analysis of different approaches to the assessment of upper airway morphology: a CBCT study. Orthod Craniofac Res 13:96–105
Linder-Aronson S (1970) Adenoids. Their effect on mode of breathing and nasal airflow and their relationship to characteristics of the facial skeleton and the denition. A biometric, rhino-manometric and cephalometro-radiographic study on children with and without adenoids. Acta Otolaryngol 69:1–132
Lopes PM, Moreira CR, Perrella A et al (2008) 3-D volume rendering maxillofacial analysis of angular measurements by multislice CT. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 105:224–230
Ludlow JB, Gubler M, Cevidanes L, Mol A (2009) Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136(3):312–313
Major MP, Flores-Mir C, Major PW (2006) Assessment of lateral cephalometric diagnosis of adenoid hypertrophy and posterior upper airway obstruction: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:700–708
McNamara JA Jr (1981) Influence of respiratory pattern on craniofacial growth. Angle Orthod 51:269–300
Mohsenin V (2003) Effects of gender on upper airway collapsibility and severity of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Med 4:523–529
Oz U, Orhan K, Abe N (2011) Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two dimensional conventional methods and three dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 40:492–500
Oz U, Rubenduz M (2011) Craniofacial differences between skeletal Class II and Class I malocclusions according to vertical classification. J Stomat Occ Med 4:105−111
Preston BC, Tobias VP, Salem HO (2004) Skeletal age and growth of the nasopharynx in the sagittal plane: a cephalometric study. Semin Orthod 10:16–38
Proffit RW, Fields Jr WH, Ackerman LJ et al (2000) Contemporary Orthodontics, 3rd ed. St. Louis, Missouri 2–22
Samman N, Mohammadi H, Xia J (2003) Cephalometric norms for upper airway in healthy Hong Kong Chinese population. Hong Kong Med J 9:25–30
Sheng CM, Lin LH, Su Y, Tsai HH (2009) Developmental changes in pharyngeal airway depth and hyoid bone position from childhood to young adulthood. Angle Orthod 79:484–490
Solow B, Skov S, Ovesen J et al (1996) Airway dimensions and head posture in obstructive sleep apnoea. Eur J Orthod 18:571–579
Standerwick RG (2009) Not all Class II patients alike. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135:573–579
Stellzig-Eisenhauer A (2001) The influence of cephalometric parameters on resonance of speech in cleft lip and palate patients. An interdisciplinary study. J Orofac Orthop 62:202–223
Subtelny JD (1980) Oral respiration: facial maldevelopment and corrective dentofacial orthopedics. Angle Orthod 50:147–164
Tangugsorn V, Krogstad O, Espeland L, Lyberg T (2000) Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): a cephalometric analysis of severe and non-severe OSA patients. Part I: Multiple comparison of cephalometric variables. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 15:139–152
Ucar FI, Uysal T (2011) Orofacial airway dimensions in subjects with Class I malocclusion and different growth patterns. Angle Orthod 81:460–468
Vlijmen OJ van, Maal T, Bergé SJ et al (2010) A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:156–160
Vizzotto MB, Liedke GS, Delamare EL et al (2012) A comparative study of lateral cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomographic images in upper airway assessment. Eur J Orthod 34:390–393
Watanabe T, Isono S, Tanaka A et al (2002) Contribution of body habitus and craniofacial characteristics to segmental closing pressures of passive pharynx in patients with sleep disordered breathing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:260–265
Ye L, Pien GW, Ratcliffe SJ, Weaver TE (2009) Gender differences in obstructive sleep apnea and treatment response to continuous positive airway pressure. J Clin Sleep Med 5:512–518
Zhong Z, Tang Z, Gao X, Zeng XL (2010) A comparison study of upper airway among different skeletal craniofacial patterns in nonsnoring Chinese children. Angle Orthod 80:267–274
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.
Interessenkonflikt
Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seine Koautoren an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oz, U., Orhan, K. & Rubenduz, M. Two-dimensional lateral cephalometric evaluation of varying types of Class II subgroups on posterior airway space in postadolescent girls: a pilot study. J Orofac Orthop 74, 18–27 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-012-0121-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-012-0121-0