Skip to main content
Log in

Quantity and distribution of plaque in orthodontic patients treated with molar bands

Plaque bei Patienten mit orthodontischen Bändern − Quantität und Verteilung

  • Originalarbeit
  • Published:
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The placement of orthodontic bands usually increases plaque accumulation due to numerous mechanical retention sites. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the amount and distribution pattern of biofilm in the oral (palatal and lingual) and interproximal regions surrounding orthodontic bands.

Materials and Methods

We evaluated the formation of biofilm on 32 orthodontic bands which had been placed intraorally for 6–37 months. Two parameters were measured: the percentage of surface covered by biofilm (quantity) and the biofilm distribution pattern of accumulation. We measured these two parameters in four regions of interest: the mesial and distal interproximal regions, as well as the mesial and distal regions of the oral attachment.

Results

The quantity of biofilm formation was similar in all four regions of interest, ranging from 13.3% to 16.8%. In contrast to biofilm quantity, distribution patterns differed in the four regions. In the mesial and distal interproximal regions it appeared as extensive insular areas in 87.5% and 71.9%, respectively, whereas it appeared more often supragingival and linear in nature in regions adjacent to the oral attachment, i.e. in 65.6% and 68.8%, respectively.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that firstly, oral hygiene in the palatal and lingual regions of orthodontic bands seems as difficult as it is in the interproximal areas, thus requiring thorough hygiene in both areas. Secondly, orthodontic patients with a history of periodontal disease require special attention regarding the use of orthodontic bands.

Zusammenfassung

Zielsetzung

Der Einsatz orthodontischer Bänder verstärkt in der Regel die Plaqueakkumulation aufgrund der vermehrten mechanischen Retentionsmöglichkeiten. Ziel der Studie war die Evaluierung von Menge und Verteilung des Biofilms in den oralen bzw. den lingualen und palatinalen sowie den interdentalen Bereichen von Molarenbändern.

Material und Methodik

Auf den adhärenten Biofilm hin untersucht wurden 32 orthodontische Bänder nach einer Verweildauer im Mund des Patienten zwischen 6 und 37 Monaten. Bestimmt wurden zwei Parameter: die Quantität, also der mit Plaque besiedelte Anteil der Oberfläche, und die Verteilung des Biofilms auf dem Band. Diese wurden in jeweils vier Bereichen überprüft: an der mesialen und distalen Interdentalfläche sowie an den Flächen direkt mesial und distal des oralen Attachments.

Ergebnisse

Die Quantität der Plaqueanhaftung, zwischen 13,3 und 16,8%, war in allen vier Bereichen vergleichbar, die Verteilung der Plaque dagegen unterschiedlich. Auf der mesialen und distalen Interdentalfläche war die Plaquebesiedlung in 87,5 bzw. 71,9% großflächig inselförmig, während die Flächen direkt mesial und distal des oralen Attachments zu 65,6 bzw. 68,8% eine strichförmige, supragingivale Plaqueansammlung zeigten.

Schlussfolgerung

Zum einen ist die Hygiene der palatinalen und lingualen Flächen eines Bandes ähnlich erschwert wie die der interdentalen Flächen; dies sollte bei der kieferorthopädischen Hygieneeinweisung Berücksichtigung finden. Außerdem ist der Einsatz von orthodontischen Bändern bei Patienten mit einer parodontalen Grunderkrankung kritisch zu betrachten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexander SA (1991) Effects of orthodontic attachments on the gingival health of permanent second molars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 100:337–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Atack NE, Sandy JR, Addy M (1996) Periodontal and microbiological changes associated with the placement of orthodontic appliances. A review. J Periodontol 67:78–85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyd RL, Baumrind S (1992) Periodontal considerations in the use of bonds or bands on molars in adolescents and adults. Angle Orthod 62:117–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyd RL, Leggott PJ, Quinn RS et al (1989) Periodontal implications of orthodontic treatment in adults with reduced or normal periodontal tissues versus those of adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 96:191–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyd RL (1983) Longitudinal evaluation of a system for self-monitoring plaque control effectiveness in orthodontic patients. J Clin Periodontol 10:380–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Busscher HJ, Mei HC van der (1997) Physico-chemical interactions in initial microbial adhesion and relevance for biofilm formation. Adv Dent Res 11:24–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Demling A, Demling C, Schwestka-Polly R et al (2010) Short-term influence of lingual orthodontic therapy on microbial parameters and periodontal status. A preliminary study. Angle Orthod 80:480–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Demling A, Elter C, Heidenblut T et al (2010) Reduction of biofilm on orthodontic brackets with the use of a polytetrafluoroethylene coating. Eur J Orthod 32:414–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Demling A, Heuer W, Elter C et al (2009) Analysis of supra- and subgingival long-term biofilm formation on orthodontic bands. Eur J Orthod 31:202–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Diamanti-Kipioti A, Gusberti FA, Lang NP (1987) Clinical and microbiological effects of fixed orthodontic appliances. J Clin Periodontol 14:326–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eliades T, Eliades G, Brantley WA (1995) Microbial attachment on orthodontic appliances: I. Wettability and early pellicle formation on bracket materials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108:351–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fransson C, Mooney J, Kinane DF et al (1999) Differences in the inflammatory response in young and old human subjects during the course of experimental gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol 26:453–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fransson C, Berglundh T, Lindhe J (1996) The effect of age on the development of gingivitis. Clinical, microbiological and histological findings. J Clin Periodontol 23:379–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Furuichi Y, Lindhe J, Ramberg P et al (1992) Patterns of de novo plaque formation in the human dentition. J Clin Periodontol 19:423–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ (1982) Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod 81:93–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Groessner-Schreiber B, Griepentrog M, Haustein I et al (2001) Plaque formation on surface modified dental implants. An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 12:543–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hannig M (1997) Transmission electron microscopic study of in vivo pellicle formation on dental restorative materials. Eur J Oral Sci 105:422–433

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hannig M (1999) Transmission electron microscopy of early plaque formation on dental materials in vivo. Eur J Oral Sci 107:55–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Heuer W, Elter C, Demling A et al (2007) Analysis of early biofilm formation on oral implants in man. J Oral Rehabil 34:377–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Huser MC, Baehni PC, Lang R (1990) Effects of orthodontic bands on microbiologic and clinical parameters. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 97:213–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lundström F, Hamp SE (1980) Effect of oral hygiene education on children with and without subsequent orthodontic treatment. Scand J Dent Res 88:53–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Naranjo A, Triviño M, Jaramillo A et al (2006) Changes in the subgingival microbiota and periodontal parameters before and 3 months after bracket placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:275.e17–e22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ogaard B, Rølla G, Arends J (1988) Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 94:68–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ong MM, Wang HL (2002) Periodontic and orthodontic treatment in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 122:420–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Paolantonio M, Festa F, Placido G di et al (1999) Site-specific subgingival colonization by Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 115:423–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Petti S, Barbato E, Simonetti D’Arca A (1997) Effect of orthodontic therapy with fixed and removable appliances on oral microbiota: a six-month longitudinal study. New Microbiol 20:55–62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Quirynen M, Bollen CM (1995) The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol 22:1–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ristic M, Vlahovic Svabic M, Sasic M et al (2008) Effects of fixed orthodontic appliances on subgingival microflora. Int J Dent Hyg 6:129–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Dr. Ralph Kastenholz for his contribution in obtaining the data for this evaluation, and the Johannes-Gutenberg University of Mainz for funding this project.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Danksagung

Wir bedanken uns bei Dr. Ralph Kastenholz für seine Mitwirkung bei der Erhebung der Daten für diese Untersuchung. Der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz danken wir für die finanzielle Unterstützung dieser Studie.

Interessenkonflikt

Keine Angaben

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Hornikel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erbe, C., Hornikel, S., Schmidtmann, I. et al. Quantity and distribution of plaque in orthodontic patients treated with molar bands. J Orofac Orthop 72, 13–20 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-010-0001-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-010-0001-4

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation