Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Redefining tumour suppressor genes: exceptions to the two-hit hypothesis

  • Review
  • Published:
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Knudson’s two-hit model of tumour suppressor genes supposes that two mutations are required to cause a tumour, one occurring in each of the two alleles of the gene. Many such cancer genes exhibiting biallelic disruption and truncating point mutations have been identified, revealing the success of the model. Despite changes in our concept of cancer genes, two inactivating point mutations are still considered the hallmark of tumour suppressor genes. Recently, however, more and more reports describe candidate tumour suppressors that do not conform to this standard definition, including haploinsufficient genes requiring inactivation of only one allele, and genes inactivated not by mutation but rather epigenetic hypermethylation. This review describes some of these exceptions and proposes a revised tumour suppressor gene definition to facilitate the identification of this new generation of tumour suppressor loci.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. J. W. Paige.

Additional information

Received 21 January 2003; received after revision 26 March 2003; accepted 1 April 2003

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paige, A.J.W. Redefining tumour suppressor genes: exceptions to the two-hit hypothesis. CMLS, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 60, 2147–2163 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-003-3027-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-003-3027-6

Navigation