Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Examining the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure: Four Preliminary Studies

  • Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) is a relatively new measure of implicit cognition that tests cognition as relational behavior instead of an associative activity and thus may provide a more specific measure of cognitive repertoires, including those for social biases, than better known implicit measures such as the Implicit Association Test (IAT). A small body of IRAP research provides tentative evidence for this measure’s potential. The current study adds to this research by using the IRAP to assess for social biases for race, religion, gender, and obesity. Overall results show medium to large effect sizes for all conditions except obesity, as well as interesting trends at the trial-type level. These outcomes and possible future directions of IRAP research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ADAMS, C. H., & WILSON, K. G. (2006). Complex human behavior and gender categorization. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Mississippi, University, MS.

    Google Scholar 

  • BACH, P., & WESTERCAMP, K. (2007, May). Delusions: Implicit or explicit belief conviction? Paper presented at the meeting for the Association for Behavior Analysis, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARNES-HOLMES, D., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., POWER, P., HAYDEN, E., MILNE, R., & STEWART, I. (2006). Do you really know what you believe? Developing the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a direct measure of implicit beliefs. Irish Psychologist, 32, 169–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARNES-HOLMES, D., HAYDEN, E., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., & STEWART, I. (in press). The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a response-time and event-related-potentials methodology for testing natural verbal relations: A preliminary study. Psychological Record.

  • BARNES-HOLMES, D., MURPHY, A., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., & STEWART, I. (2009). The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP): Exploring the impact of private versus public contexts and the response latency criterion on pro-white and anti-black stereotyping among white Irish individuals. Psychological Record.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARNES-HOLMES, D., MURTAGH, R., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., & STEWART, I. (in press). Using the Implicit Association Test and the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure to measure attitudes towards meat and vegetables in vegetarians and meat eaters. Psychological Record.

  • BARNES-HOLMES, D., WALDRON, D., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., & STEWART, I. (2009). Testing the validity of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure and the Implicit Association Test: Measuring attitudes toward Dublin and country life in Ireland. Psychological Record, 59, 389–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • BETHAY, S., SANDOZ, E. K., DRAKE, C. E., & WILSON, K. G. (2007, May). Investigation of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure as a Clinical Tool. Paper presented at the meeting for the Association for Behavior Analysis, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • BLANTON, H., & JACCARD, J. (2006). Arbitrary metrics in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 27–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BRENDL, C. M., MARKMAN, A. B., & MESSNER, C. (2001). How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 760–773.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CAMPBELL, C., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2008, May). Measuring self-esteem using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP). Paper presented at the meeting for the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • CULLEN, C., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2008). Implicit pride and prejudice: A heterosexual phenomenon? In T. G. Morrison & M. A. Morrison (Eds.), The Psychology of Modern Prejudice (pp. 195–223). New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAWSON, D. L., BARNES-HOLMES, D., GRESSWELL, D. M., HART, A. J. P., & GORE, N. J. (in press). Assessing the implicit beliefs of sexual offenders using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure: A first study. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment.

  • DE HOUWER, J. (2003). The extrinsic affective Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 50, 77–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DRAKE, C. E., & WILSON, K. G. (2007, May). Evaluating a behavioral measure of psychological flexibility. Paper presented at the meeting for the Association for Behavior Analysis, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • FIEDLER, K., MESSNER, C., & BLUEMKE, M. (2006). Unresolved problems with the ‘I’, the ‘A’, and the ‘T’: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (Iat). European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 74–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GREENWALD, A. G., MCGHEE, D. E., & SCHWARTZ, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GREENWALD, A. G., NOSEK, B. A., & BANAJI, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GREENWALD, A. G., NOSEK, B. A., BANAJI, M. R., & KLAUER, K. C. (2005). Validity of the salience asymmetry interpretation of the Implicit Association Test: Comment on Rothermund and Wentura (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 420–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GREENWALD, A. G., POEHLMAN, T. A., UHLMANN, E., & BANAJI, M. R. (in press). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: Iii. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

  • GREENWALD, A. G., RUDMAN, L. A., NOSEK, B. A., & ZAYAS, V. (2006). Why so little faith? A reply to Blanton and Jaccard’s (2006) skeptical view of testing pure multiplicative theories. Psychological Review, 113, 170–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & ROCHE, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOFMANN, W., GAWRONSKI, B., GSCHWENDNER, T., LE, H., & SCHMITT, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369–1385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KEOGH, C., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2007, May). Using the Irap with emotional stimuli: Assessing the impact of clinical interventions. Paper presented at the meeting for the Association for Behavior Analysis, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • KEOGH, C., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2008, May). Using the Irap to investigate the impact of cognitive defusion on negative self-concepts. Paper presented at the meeting for the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • LANE, K. A., BANAJI, M. R., NOSEK, B. A., & GREENWALD, A. G. (2007). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: IV. What we know (so far) about the method. In B. Wittenbrink & N. S. Schwarz (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes: Procedures and controversies. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LUCAS, N. N., DRAKE, C. E., WEINSTEIN, J., WILSON, K. G. (2008, May). Judge thy neighbor as thyself: An investigation and disruption of verbal processes in anti-Muslim prejudice. Paper presented at the meeting for the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCKENNA, I. M., BARNES-HOLMES, D., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., & STEWART, I. (2007). Testing the fake-ability of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP): The first study. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 7, 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOSEK, B., & BANAJI, M. R. (2001). The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition, 19, 625–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOSEK, B. A., GREENWALD, A. G., & BANAJI, M. R. (2007). The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Automatic processes in social thinking and behavior (pp. 265–292). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’TOOLE, C., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (in press). Three chronometric indices of relational responding as predictors of performance on a brief intelligence test: The importance of relational flexibility. Psychological Record.

  • POWER, P. M., BARNES-HOLMES, D., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., & STEWART, I. (2009). The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a measure of implicit relative preferences: A first study. Psychological Record, 59, 621–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROTHERMUND, K., & WENTURA, D. (2004). Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test: Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 133, 139–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • VAHEY, N. A., BARNES-HOLMES, D., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., & STEWART, I. (2009). A first test of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure as a measure of self-esteem: Irish prisoner groups and university students. Psychological Record, 59, 371–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEINSTEIN, J. H., WILSON, K. G., DRAKE, C. E., & KELLUM, K. K. (2008). A relational frame theory contribution to social categorization. Behavior and Social Issues, 17, 39–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Mississippi, Room 311C Peabody Building, University, MS, 38677, USA

    Chad E. Drake, Karen Kate Kellum, Kelly G. Wilson, Jonathan H. Weinstein & Catherine H. Adams

  2. Portland Psychotherapy Clinic, Research, and Training Center, PC, USA

    Jason B. Luoma

Authors
  1. Chad E. Drake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karen Kate Kellum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kelly G. Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jason B. Luoma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jonathan H. Weinstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Catherine H. Adams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly G. Wilson.

Additional information

The authors would like to thank Leigh Everett, Jana Graham, Adam Hahs, and William D. Newsome, Jr., for their invaluable assistance in this collection of studies and Dermot Barnes-Holmes and one anonymous reviewer for their helpful suggestions on the manuscript. Chad Drake is currently an assistant professor at the University of South Carolina Aiken.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Drake, C.E., Kellum, K.K., Wilson, K.G. et al. Examining the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure: Four Preliminary Studies. Psychol Rec 60, 81–100 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395695

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395695

Key words

Search

Navigation