Skip to main content
Log in

A district-wide examination of 75-year olds suggests discrimination in the provision of services

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the adequacy of existing services across a whole health district for those aged 75 years, in an attempt to detect shortfalls and biases in the provision of services. This study was carried out as a cross-sectional survey using community based nurses in the county of South Glamorgan. 1376 people in their 75th year who were registered with a general practitioner were visited, and their problems assessed by community based nurses. There was a marked difference in the results of the assessment for different services. It was estimated that 76% of the 75-year olds would benefit from additional health services, and 37% from social services. There was a striking difference between the services in the proportion of people whose problems were satisfactorily solved, according to the criteria used by the community nurses. The proportion of problems that were solved varied according to the degree of dependency of the individuals, and the service involved. Some services showed a clear trend to care more for dependent people; services with a relatively undeveloped home delivery system seemed likely to discriminate against people who were dependent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Waine C.: The primary health care team. Br. J. Gen. Practice 42: 498–499, 1992.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown K., Williams E.I., Groom L.: Health check on patients 75 years and over after the new GP contract. Br. Med. J. 305: 619–621, 1992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Harris A.: Health checks for people over 75. Br. Med. J. 305: 599–600, 1992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tremellen J.: Assessment of patients aged over 75 in general practice. Br. Med. J. 305: 621–624, 1992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rotherham Family Health Services Authority:GPs assessments of people aged 75 and over. Family Health Services Authority, Rotherham, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Luker K.A.: Evaluating health visiting practice. Royal College of Nursing Monograph. Royal College of Nursing, London, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cox D.R.: The analysis of binary data. Methuen Monograph, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vetter N.J., Charny M., Lewis P.A., Farrow S.: Prevalence and treatment of symptoms of rheumatism and arthritis among over 65 year olds: a community profile. J. Royal College Gen. Pract. 40: 69–71, 1990.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rubenstein L.Z.: The efficacy of geriatric assessment programs. In: Kane R.L., Grimley Evans J., MacFadyen D. (Eds.), Improving the health of older people. World Health Organisation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1990, pp. 417–439.

    Google Scholar 

  10. McEwan R.T., Forster D.P.: A review of the costs and effectiveness of assessing the elderly in general practice. Fam. Pract. 10: 55–62, 1993.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor R., Ford G., Barber H.: Research Perspectives on Ageing: The Elderly at Risk. Age Concern Research Unit, Mitcham, Surrey, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Illiffe S., Tai S.S., Haines A.: Are elderly people living alone an at risk group? Br. Med. J. 305: 1001–1004, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vetter N.J., Lewis P.A., Llewellyn L.: Is there a right age for case finding in elderly people? Age Ageing 22: 121–124, 1993.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vetter, N., George, M. & Lewis, P. A district-wide examination of 75-year olds suggests discrimination in the provision of services. Aging Clin Exp Res 8, 205–210 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03339678

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03339678

Key words

Navigation