Skip to main content
Log in

Analisi costi-benefici di una strategia vaccinale antinfluenzale condotta presso una società del gruppo ENI (Snamprogetti)

A cost-benefit analysis of anti-influenza vaccination in a company in Italy (Snamprogetti)

  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Italian Research Articles

Summary

Objective

To estimate costs and benefits of a preventive anti-influenza vaccination in a group of employees of Snamprogetti (an ENI-group company), in order to define a scheme of cost-benefit analysis to be used for other strategies of vaccination and in other contexts.

Design

In an observational study conducted from October 1999 to June 2000, 153 employees (about 10% of the whole staff of Snamprogetti), who voluntarily underwent the vaccination, were compared with 153 non-vaccinated people working in the same context and matched for age and gender. The outcome was evaluated by checking records from the personnel department about absence from work and related causes, including influenza. Costs and benefits of the anti-influenza vaccination from the Snamprogetti point of view were subsequently calculated.

Results

The anti-influenza vaccination strategy reduced the absence of people from work by 77% and decreased the loss of working days by 82%. The ratio between the benefits of the vaccination strategy (less working days lost) and its costs was 12.12. The ratio remains favourable when the mean cost of a working day for the enrolled employees is used, resulting in a benefit-cost ratio of 9.45.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that the implementation of the anti-influenza vaccination strategy in Snamprogetti was cost saving. The cost-benefit analysis used in this study could also be used for other vaccination strategies and in other contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliografia

  1. Cate TR. Clinical manifestations and consequences of influenza. Am J Med 1987; 82: 15–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Neuzil KM, Reed GW. Influenza-associated morbidity and mortality in young and middle-aged women. JAMA 1999; 281(10): 901–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nicholson KG. Socioeconomics of influenza and influenza vaccination in Europe. PharmacoEconomics 1996; 9 (suppl. 3): 75–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ministero della Sanità. Circolare n. 11/1999. Profilassi antinfluenzale.

  5. Sullivan KM. Health impact of influenza in the United States. PharmacoEconomics 1996; 9 (suppl. 3): 26–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Knottnerus JA. Influenza in the Netherlands. PharmacoEconomics 1996; 9 (suppl. 3): 46–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gasparini R, Pozzi T, Bonanni P, Fragapane E. Valutazione dei costi di un’epidemia influenzale nella popolazione lavorativa di Siena. Giornale di Farmacoeconomia 2000; 1: 3–9

    Google Scholar 

  8. Postma MJ, Bos JM, Van Gennep M. Economic evaluation of influenza vaccination. PharmacoEconomics 1999; 16 (suppl. 1): 33–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumpulainen V, Makela M. Influenza vaccination among healthy employees: a cost-benefit analysis. Scand J Infect Dis 1997; 29: 181–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Levy E. French economic evaluations of influenza and influenza vaccination. PharmacoEconomics 1996; 9 (suppl. 3): 62–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nichol KL, Lind A, Margolis KL, et al. The effectiveness of vaccination against influenza in healthy, working adults. N Engl J Med 1995; 333(14): 889–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilde JA, McMillan JA, Serwint J, et al. Effectiveness of influenza vaccine in health care professionals: a randomized trial. JAMA 1999; 281(10): 908–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Breiman RF, Butler JC, McInnes PM. Vaccine to prevent respiratory infection: opportunities on the near and far horizon. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 1999; 12: 145–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Drummond MF, Stoddard GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sloan FA. Valuing Health Care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Freund DA, Dittus RS. Principles of pharmacoeconomic analysis of drug therapy. PharmacoEconomics 1992; 1(1): 20–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lucioni C. Costi e benefici della vaccinazione. Vaccinazione 2000 1995; 7, 37 (suppl.): 31–7

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sobal J, Loveland FC. Infectious disease in a total institution: a study of the influenza epidemic of 1978 on a college campus. Public Health Rep 1982; 97(1): 66–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lucioni C, Sessa A, Costa B. I costi dell’influenza in Italia. Farmeconomia e percorsi terapeutici 2001; 1(1): 11–8

    Google Scholar 

  20. Koplan JP. The benefits and costs of immunization revisited. Drug Information Journal 1988; 22: 379–83

    Google Scholar 

  21. van der Oever R, de Graeve D, Hepp B, et al. Pharmaeconomics of immunization. A review. PharmacoEconomics 1993; 3(4): 286–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Conway SP, Leese B. Routine childhood immunisation. It is worth it? PharmacoEconomics 1993; 3(3): 183–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. ISTAT. Rivalutazione monetaria. Indici prezzi al consumo 2001. Consultabile all’indirizzo http://www.istat.it/Anotizie/Acom/pre-con/indiceistat/variazioni.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giorgio L. Colombo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colombo, G.L., Nicosia, V., Lesma, A. et al. Analisi costi-benefici di una strategia vaccinale antinfluenzale condotta presso una società del gruppo ENI (Snamprogetti). Pharmacoeconomics-Ital-Res-Articles 3, 71–80 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03320581

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03320581

Navigation