Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fractured penis: a clinical misnomer!

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A ‘fracture’ of the penis refers to a tear in the deep layer of the tunica albuginea (Buck’s fascia) and may be associated with a urethral injury.

Aim

To describe a classical case of a ‘fractured’ penis and discuss the management options.

Method

A case report of a 30-year-oid man presented with a ‘fractured’ penis and who underwent surgical intervention.

Conclusion

This rare occurrence represents a urological emergency and necessitates imaging and repair of the cavernosal defect in order to prevent poorfunctional outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mydlo JH, Hayyeri M, Macchia RJ. Urethrography and cavernosography imaging in a small series of penile fractures: a comparison with surgical findings.Urology 1998;51: 616–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Koga S, Saito Y, Arakaki Y et al. Sonography in fracture of the penis.Br J Urol 1993;72: 228–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yokogi H. Magnetic resonance imaging of a penile fracture.Acta Urol Belg 1992;60: 93–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fedel M, Venz S, Andreessen R, Sudhoff F, Loening SA. The value of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of suspected penile fracture with atypical clinical findings.J Urol 1996;155: 1924–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ozen HA. Fracture of the penis and long-term results of surgical treatment.Br J Urol 1986;58: 551–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wespes E, Libert M, Simon J, Schulman CC. Fracture of the penis: conservative versus surgical treatment.Eur Urol 1987;13: 166–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Karadeniz T, Topsakal M, Ariman A, Erton H, Basak D. Penile fracture: differential diagnosis, management and outcomes.Br J Urol 1996;177: 279–81.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zargooshi J. Penile fracture in Kermanshah, Iran: report of 172 cases.J Urol 2000;164: 364–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mydlo JH. Surgeon experience with penile fracture.J Urol 2001;166: 526–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zargooshi J. Penile fracture in Kermanshah, Iran: the long-term results of surgical treatment.BJU Int 2002;89: 890–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fergany AF, Angermeier KW, Montague DK. Review of Cleveland Clinic experience with penile fracture.Urology 1999;54: 352–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Penson DF, Seftel AD, Krane RJ, Frohrib D, Goldstein I. The haemodynamic pathophysiology of impotence following blunt trauma to the erect penis.J Urol 1992;148: 1178–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4

    R. G. Casey, D. Galvin, D. Bouchier-Hayes & G. Lennon

Authors
  1. R. G. Casey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Galvin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Bouchier-Hayes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Lennon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. G. Casey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Casey, R.G., Galvin, D., Bouchier-Hayes, D. et al. Fractured penis: a clinical misnomer!. Ir J Med Sci 174, 55–57 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168520

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168520

Keywords

Search

Navigation