Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How often do australians move? alternative measures of population mobility

  • Published:
Journal of the Australian Population Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conventional census-based measures of population mobility are conceptually abstruse, ignore multiple moves and obscure the diversity of human migration experience. This paper explores three alternatives and outlines their strengths and limitations. Application of life table techniques to convert transition rates to migration expectancies generates measures that are more readily understood, automatically standardizes for age and enables the timing of mobility to be analysed methodically. Data on movement frequencies and residence duration provide new perspectives indicating substantial chronic mobility and significant differences between frequent movers and long term stayers. A number of simple summary statistics are proposed to supplement transition rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. 1993.Families in Australia: A Guide to Content and Procedures, March 1992-May 1992. Catalogue No. 4415.0. Canberra.

  • Bailey, M. and D.F. Sly. 1987. Metropolitan-nonmetropolitan migration expectancy in the United States, 1965–1980.Genus 53(3/4):37–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M.J. 1992.Internal Migration in Australia, 1981–1986. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M.J. 1995.Internal Migration in Australia, 1986–1991: Overview Report. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M.J. and J.A. Cooper. 1992. How far and how often do Australians move? Paper presented to the Sixth National Conference of the Australian Population Association, 28–30 September, Sydney.

  • Bell, M.J. and J.A. Cooper. 1995.Internal Migration in Australia, 1986–1991: The Overseasborn. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M.J. and C.A. Maher. 1995.Internal Migration in Australia, 1986–1991: The Labour Force. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogue, D. 1969.Principles of Demography. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.A.V. and J.O. Huff. 1977. Some empirical tests of duration-of-stay effects in internal migration.Environment and Planning A 9(12):1357–1374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courgeau, D. 1995. Migration theories and behavioural models.International Journal of Population Geography 1:19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courgeau, D. and E. Lelievre. 1991. The event history approach in demography.Population (English Selection) 3(3):63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge, H.T. 1964. The influence of return migration upon rates of net migration.Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute 40:321–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge, H.T. 1965. Primary, secondary and return migration in the United States.Demography 2:444–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, S. 1954. Repeated migration as a factor in high mobility rates.American Sociological Review 19:536–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, S. 1964. The extent of repeated migration: an analysis based on the Danish population register.Journal of the American Statistical Association 59:1121–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, M. and L.G. Pol. 1994. Migration expectancy revisited: results for the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s.Population Research and Policy Review 13:195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, L.H. 1970. On measuring geographic mobility.Journal of the American Statistical Association 65:1195–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, L.H. 1973. New estimates of migration expectancy in the United States.Journal of the American Statistical Association 68:37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, L.H. 1988.Migration and Residential Mobility in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J.F. and C.G. Bortlein. 1991. Comparing migration measures having different intervals. Pp.1–11 inCurrent Population Reports, Series P-23, Special Studies No. 166, US Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC.

  • Morrison, P.A. 1971. Chronic movers and the future redistribution of population: a longitudinal analysis.Demography 8(2): 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, C.A. and J. Whitelaw. 1995.Residential Mobility and Urban Development: Australian Cities 1986–1991. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Australian Government Actuary. 1991.Australian Life Tables, 1985–1987. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickles, A.R., R.B. Davies and R. Crouchley. 1982. Heterogeneity, nonstationarity, and duration-of-stay effects in migration.Environment and Planning A 14(5):615–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plane, D.A. and P.A. Rogerson. 1994.The Geographical Analysis of Population with Applications to Planning and Business. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A., R. Racquillet and L.J. Castro. 1978. Model migration schedules and their applications.Environment and Planning A 10(5):475–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, D.T. 1983.Population and Educational Planning: The Demographic Context of Changing School Enrolments in Australian Cities. ERDC Report 36, Education Research and Development Committee. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, H.L. 1995. Geographical mobility and mobility expectancy: trends in the United States of America, 1956–1987.Genus 51(1–2): 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T.R. 1979. A note on the consequences of risk aversion and age for duration-of-stay effects in a heterogeneous population.Geographical Analysis 11(2):183–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taeuber, I. 1961. Duration-of-residence analysis of internal migration in the United States.Millbank Quarterly Memorial Fund 39:116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warnes, T. 1992. Migration and the life course. Pp. 175–187 in T. Champion and T. Fielding (eds),Migration Processes and Patterns: Volume 1, Research Progress and Prospects. New York: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilber, G.L. 1963. Migration expectancy in the United States.Journal of the American Statistical Association 58:444–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulff, M.G. and M.J. Bell. Forthcoming.Internal Migration, Social Welfare and Settlement Patterns: Impacts on Households and Communities. Bureau of Immigration, Multicultural and Population Research, Canberra.

  • Wulff, M.G. and C. Maher. 1995. Long term renters in the Australian housing market. Paper presented at the Conference of the New Zealand Geographical Society, Session on Housing and Social Change: Diversity Markets and Policy, August, 1995.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, The University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Adelaide

    Martin Bell

Authors
  1. Martin Bell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bell, M. How often do australians move? alternative measures of population mobility. Journal of Population Research 13, 101–124 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029490

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029490

Keywords

Search

Navigation