Skip to main content
Log in

Staging of palpable tl-2 invasive breast cancer with helical ct

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of contrast-enhanced high resolution helical computed tomography (CT) for assessing locoregional staging of palpable Tl-2 invasive breast cancer. Methods: Helical CT studies of 156 lesions from 156 patients with invasive breast cancer before breast-conserving surgery were examined. A lesion was defined as positive if focal enhancement was detected by CT within 100 seconds after contrast material administration. After resection, tumors were histopathologically mapped and comparison made with the extent of contrast enhancement.

Results

Helical CT enabled detection of all 156 index tumors. CT enabled detection of 28 of 43 multifocal lesions (65%) and five of five multicentric lesions (100%). In 24 of 33 lesions (73%), CT revealed additional cancers not seen on mammography. The extent of tumor significantly correlated with CT measurements (r=0.76,p<0.0001).

Conclusion

Helical CT of the breast is an accurate preoperative imaging modality for assessing the locoregional staging of Tl-2 invasive breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CT:

Computed tomography

MR:

Magnetic resonance

HU:

Hounsfield units

References

  1. Schnitt SJ, Abner A, Gelman R,et al: The relationship between microscopic margins of resection and the risk of local recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy.Cancer 74:1746–1751, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smitt MC, Nowels KW, Zdeblick MJ,et al: The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long term results of breast conservation.Cancer 76:259–267, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Uematsu T, Shiina M, Kobayashi S,et al: Helical CT of the breast: detection of intraductal spread and multicentricity of breast cancer.Nippon Acta Radiologica 57:85–88, 1997 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Akashi-Tanaka S, Fukutomi T, Miyakawa K,et al: Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced computed tomography for diagnosing the intraductal component of breast cancer.Breast Cancer Research and Treat- ment 49:79–86, 1998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stamper PC, Connolly JL: Mammographic features predicting an extensive intraductal component in early-stage infiltrating ductal carcinoma.AJR 158:269–272, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sakamoto G: Infiltrating carcinoma: major histologcal types. Page DL, Anderson TJ eds, Diagnostic histopathology of the breast, 1 st ed, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh ppl93–197, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM,et al: Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy.Radiology 196:115–122, 1995.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mumtaz H, Hall-Craggs MA, Davidson T,et al: Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging.AJR 169:417–424, 1997.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang CHJ, Sibala JL, Gallagher JH,et al: Computed tomography of the breast: A preliminary report.Radiology 124:827–829, 1977.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang CHJ, Sibala JL, Fritz SL,et al: Computed tomo- graphic evaluation of the breast.AJR 131:459–464, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chang CHJ, Nesbit DE, Fisher DR,et al: Computed tomographic mammography using a conventional body scanner.AJR 138:553–558, 1982.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Muller JWT, Van Waes PFG, Koehler PR: Computed tomography of breast lesions: comparison with x-ray mammography.J Comput Assist Tomogr 7:650–654, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sardanelli F, Calabrese M, Zandrino F,et al: Dynamic helical CT of breast tumors.J Comput Assist Tomogr 22:398–407, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Heiken JP, Brink JA, Vannier MW: Spiral (Helical) CT.Radiology 189:647–656, 1993.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Raptopoulos V, Baum JK, Hochman M,et al: High resolution CT mammography of surgical biopsy spec-imens.J Comput Assist Tomogr 20:179–184, 1996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ohtake T, Abe R, Kimijima I,et al: Intraductal extension of primary invasive breast carcinoma treated by breast-conservative surgery.Cancer 76:32–45, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Evans SH, Davis R, Cooke J,et al: A comparison of radiation doses to the breast in computed tomographic chest examinations for two scanning protocols.Clin Radiol 140:45–46, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Frush DP, Donnelly LF: Helical CT in children: Technical considerations and body applications.Radiology 209:37–48, 1998.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Uematsu, T., Sano, M., Homma, K. et al. Staging of palpable tl-2 invasive breast cancer with helical ct. Breast Cancer 8, 125–130 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02967491

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02967491

Key words

Navigation