Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“How Safe is Splenectomy?”

  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increased risk of sepsis in patients following splenectomy has been well documented. Fear of over-whelming post-splenectomy sepsis (OPSI) has resulted in a generalised trend towards splenic salvage among surgeons. However, splenorrhaphy and attempts at splenic salvage may of themselves predispose to significant morbidity, sometimes more serious than increased susceptibility to infection associated with splenectomy. This study aims to assess the risk of splenectomy and subsequent asplenia.

We reviewed 246 patients who underwent splenectomy over a 16 year period. Indications for splenectomy were considered under the following headings: haematological (N = 116), trauma (N = 69), visceral carcinoma (N = 28), incidental (N = 13) and miscellaneous (N = 20).

There were 28 deaths in the series, primarily among those in the intra-abdominal carcinoma (13) and multiple trauma (13) groups. Two deaths were recorded among patients undergoing elective splenectomy for benign disease. Thrombo-embolic complications were recorded in nine patients; respiratory tract infection in 36 patients and intra-abdominal abscess in two patients. Two cases of post-splenectomy pneumococcal septicaemia were documented, neither of which was fatal.

While not an entirely benign procedure, splenectomy can be performed relatively safely, especially when performed for benign disease in an adult population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brooks, D. H. Surgery of the spleen. Surg. Clin. North. Amer. 1975; 55(2): 287–300.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sherman, R. Rationale for and methods of splenic preservation following trauma. Surg. Clin. North. Amer. 1981; 61 (1): 127–134.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Quittenbaum, K. S. Commentarii de splenie hypertrophie et historia extirpationis. Rostock, 1836.

  4. Kocher, E. T. Textbook of operative surgery (English 3rd. edition), Eds. Stiles, H. J., Paul, C. B., London, A., Black, C. 1911, 565–566.

  5. Pearce, R. M., Krumbhaar, E. B., Frazier, C. H. The history of extirpation of the spleen. In Pearce, R. M. et al, eds., The spleen and anaemia: experimental and clinical studies. Philadelphia; JB Lippincott, 1918; 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Morris, D. H., Bullock, F. D. The importance of the spleen in the resistance to infection: Ann, Surg. 1919; 70: 513–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. King, H., Schumacker, H. B. Susceptibility to infection after splenectomy performed in infancy. Ann. Surg. 1952; 136: 239–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Diamond, L. K. Splenectomy in childhood and the hazard of overwhelming infection. Pediatrics 1969; 5: 886–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van Wyck D. B. Overwhelming post-splenectomy infection: the clinical syndrome. Lymphology 1983; 16: 107–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Singer, D. B. Post-splenectomy sepsis. Perspect. Pediatr. Pathol. 1973; 1: 285.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Horan, M., Colebatch, J. H. Relation between splenectomy and subsequent infection: a clinical study. Arch Dis. Child. 1962; 37: 398.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Walker, W. Splenectomy in childhood: a review of cases in England and Wales, 1960-1964. Br. J. Surg. 1976; 63:36–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shaw, J. H. F., Print, C. G. Post-splenectomy sepsis. Br. J. Surg. 1989; 76: 1074–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Neal, B. J., McDonald, J. C. The risk of sepsis in the asplenic adult. Ann. Surg. 1981; 194: 775.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lucas, C. E. Splenic trauma: choice of management. Ann. Surg. 1991; 213(2): 98–112.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Holdsworth, R. J., Irving, A. D., Cuschieri, A. Post-splenectomy sepsis and its mortality rate: actual versus perceived risks. Br. J. Surg. 1991; 78: 1031–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Beal, S. L., Spisso, J. M. The risk of splenorrhaphy. Arch. Surg. 1988; 123: 1158–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Coil, J. A., Dickerman, J. D.,Boulton, E. Increased susceptibility of splenectomized mice to infection after exposure to an aerosolized suspension of type III streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect. Immunol. 1978; 21: 412–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Constantopoulos, A., Najjar, V. A., Wish, J. B., Necheles, T. H., Stolbach, L. L. Defective phagocytosis due to tuftsin deficiency in splenectomized subjects. Am. J. Dis. Child. 1973; 125: 663–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Koren, A., Haasz, R., Tiatler, A., Katzuni, E. Serum immunoglobulin levels in children after splenectomy. Am. J. Dis. Child. 1984; 138: 53–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hosea, S. W., Brown, E. J., Hamburger, M. I., Frank, M. M. Opsonic requirements for intravascular clearance after splenectomy. N. Engl. J. Med. 1981; 304: 245–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Likhite, V. V. Opsonin and leukophilic gamma globulin in chronically splenectomized rats with and without heterotropic autotransplanted splenic tissue. Nature 1975; 253: 742–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. DiPadova, F., Durig, M., Harder, F. et al. Impaired antipneumococcal antibody production in patients without spleens. Br. Med. J. 1985; 290: 14–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Aaberge, I. S., Heier, H. E., Hem, E. et al. IgM and IgG response to pneumococcal vaccine in normal individuals and individuals splenectomized due to trauma. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand. 1984; 92: 11–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cogbill, T. H., Moore, E. E., Jurkovich, G. J., Morris, J. A., Mucha, P., Shackford, S. R. Non-operative management of blunt splenic trauma: a multicentre experience. J. Trauma 1989: 10: 1312–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mucha, P., Daly, R. C., Farnell, M. B. Selective management of blunt splenic trauma. J. Trauma 1986; 26: 970–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wisner, D. H., Blaisdell, F. W. When to save the ruptured spleen. Surgery 1992; 111(2): 121–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University Department of Surgery, Cork Regional Hospital and University College, Cork, Ireland

    S. T. O’Sullivan, C. M. Reardon, J. A. O’Donnell, W. O. Kirwan & M. P. Brady

  2. Cork Regional Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland

    M. P. Brady

Authors
  1. S. T. O’Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. M. Reardon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. A. O’Donnell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. W. O. Kirwan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. P. Brady
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Sullivan, S.T., Reardon, C.M., O’Donnell, J.A. et al. “How Safe is Splenectomy?”. I.J.M.S. 163, 374–378 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02942831

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02942831

Keywords

Search

Navigation