Summary
There was no significant difference in the palatibility of the 3 liquid antacids tested on the basis of palatability preference and score. It was impossible to predict palatibility preference even with foreknowledge of taste preference.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mendelsohn, D. and Mendelsohn, L. 1975. Hydrogen ion, pepsin and bile acid binding properties of hydrotalcite. S. African Med. J. 49, 1011.
Peterson, W. L., Sturdevant, R. A. L., Frankl, H. D., Richardson, C. T., Isenberg, J. I., Elashoff, J. D., Stones, J. Q., Gross, R. A., McCallum, R. W. and Fordtran, J. S. 1977. Healing of duodenal ulcer with an antacid regimen. New Eng. J. Med. 297, 341.
Piper, D. W. 1973. Antacid and anticholinergic drug therapy.In Clinics in Gastroenterology, Vol. 2, No. 2. Ed. W. Sircus. London. W. B. Saunders Company. pp. 361–377.
Roph, H. P. and Berger, D. G. 1959. Observations of actual as compared with prescribed intake of antacids on a hospital ward. Gastroenterology 38, 360.
Spiro, H. 1971. The management of peptic ulcer disease.In Peptic Ulcer; A Medcom Perspective in Progress. Fort Washington. Medcom Inc. pp. 75–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mullaney, M., Corcoran, B. & Fielding, J.F. Liquid antacids: Palatability and predicatability study. IJMS 149, 209–211 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02939141
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02939141