Abstract
Scandium and ash methods' performances were compared in terms of soil content assessment in sugar cane loads, emphasizing the common sampling drawbacks. Both methods are adequate for such determination in controlled conditions. The scandium has demonstrated better analytical characteristics, since it is free from interferences of cane matrix, which decreases the accuracy of the ash method in normal mill conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. Trabanelli, G. Mantovani, and F. Zucchi,Sugar Technol. Rev. 14, 1–27 (1988).
J. H. M. Smits and R. L. Blunt,Proc. SASTA 50, 1–4 (1976).
M. A. Brokensha and E. Mellet,Proc. SASTA 51, 97–100 (1977).
A. C. Fernandes and E. R. Oliveira,Proc. ISSCT 16, 1963–1973 (1977).
V. F. Nascimento Filho, E. A. N. Fernandes, E. S. B. Ferraz, and L. C. R. Pessenda,Proc. Reunião Annual SBPC 38(7), 7, 8 (1986).
J. A. Aylmer and R. J. Holmes,Int. Sugar J. 83, 362–364, 996 (1981).
J. G. Loughran, G. Cowan, and V. Mason,Proc. ISSCT 18, 942–951 (1983).
E. A. N. Fernandes,J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 168, 1, 41–46 (1993).
M. A. Bacchi, Thesis, CENA/USP, Piracicaba, p. 80 (1993).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Nadai Fernandes, E.A., Bacchi, M.A. Nuclear and conventional methods for soil determination in sugar cane industry. Biol Trace Elem Res 43, 643–648 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02917367
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02917367