Abstract
Significant attention is being given to the impact of the Internet on forms of “cybersex”. Few studies of cybersex have provided cross-sectional analysis of pornography use. Moreover, no analysis has contrasted pornography on the Internet with other technological forms. This is problematic when attempting to evaluate the impact technology has had on pornography use. In an attempt to address the question posed by Stern and Handel (2001), “does technology matter?” to pornography use, this study reports descriptive findings from the General Social Survey since 1973. Specifically, three technological contexts were operationalized from items in the GSS to describe pornography use and the demographic characteristics of persons who use pornography in three technologies: film, theater or VCR, or websites. A greater proportion of people, who reported use of pornography were males, young persons, and persons who lived in urban areas. Variations in other demographic characteristics such as employment status and income, however, suggested that technology does make a difference in pornography access and, thus, use.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barron, M., & M. Kimmel. (2000). Sexual violence in three pornographic media: Toward a sociological explanation.Journal of Sex Research 37 (2).
Binik, Y. (2001). Sexuality and the Internet: Lots of Hyp(othesis)—only a little data.Journal of Sex Research 38 (4): 281–282.
Cooper, A., C. Scherer, S. Boies, & B. Gordon. (1999). Sexuality on the Internet: From sexual exploration to pathological expression.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 30 (2): 154–164.
Cooper, A., & E. Griffin-Shelley. (2002). Introduction: The Internet: The next sexual revolution. Pp. 1–15 in A. Cooper (ed.),Sex & the Internet: A guidebook for clinicians. New York: Brunner-Routledge.
Cooper, A., J. Morahan-Martin, R. Mathy, & M. Maheu. (2002). Toward an increased understanding of user demographics in online sexual activities.Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 28: 105–129.
Delmonico, D., & J.A. Miller. (2003). The Internete screening test: A comparison of sexual compulsives versus non-sexual compulsives.Sexual and Relationship Therapy 18 (3): 261–276.
Dines, G., R. Jensen, & A. Russ. (1998).Pornography: The Production and Consumption of Inequality. New York: Routledge.
Downs, D. (1989).The new politics of pornography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dworkin, A. (1981).Pornography: Men possessing women. New York: Putnam.
Durkin, K. & C. Bryant. (1995). “Log on to sex”: Some notes on the carnal computer and erotic cyberspace as an emerging research frontier.Deviant Behavior 16: 179–200.
Gagnon, J., & W. Simon. (1973).Sexual conduct: The social sources of sexuality. Chicago: Aldine.
Gagnon, J., & W. Simon. (1970). Prospects for change in American sexual patterns.Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality 4: 100–117.
General Social Survey (1972–2002) [Cumulative data file]. Available from Survey Documentation and Analysis, SDA Archives, Berkley University, www.csa.berkley.edu:752/.
Hawkins, G., & F. Zimring. (1988).Pornography in a free society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Holmes, R., R. Tewksbury, & S. Holmes. (1998). Hidden JPGs: A functional alternative to voyeurism.Journal of Popular Culture 32 (3): 17–29.
Jenkins, P. (2001).Beyond tolerance: Child pornography on the Internet. New York: New York University Press.
Jones, S. (ed.). (1997).Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety. California: Sage Publications.
Karp, D. (1973). Hiding in pornographic bookstores: A reconsideration of the nature of urban anonymity.Urban Life and Culture 2: 427–451.
Lane, F. S., III. (2000).Obscene profits: The entrepreneurs of pornography in the cyber age. New York: Routledge.
Laumann, E., S. Ellingson, J. Mahay, A. Paik, & Y. Youm (Eds.). (2004).The sexual organization of the city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Laumann, E., J. Gagnon, R. Michael, & S. Michaels. (1994).The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Linz, D., & N. Malamuth. (1993).Pornography. California: Sage Publications.
Lynxwiler, J., & D. Gay. (2000). Moral boundaries and deviant music: Public attitudes toward heavy metal and rap.deviant Behavior 21: 63–85.
Mahay, J., E. Laumann, & S. Michaels. (2001). Race, gender, and class in sexual scripts.” In E. Laumann & S. Michaels (Eds.),Sex, love, and health in America: Private choices and public policies (pp. 197–238). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mehta, M. (2001). Pornography in Usenet: A study of 9800 randomly selected images.Cyberpsychology and Behavior 4: 695–703.
Mehta, M., & D. Plaza. (1997). Content analysis of pornographic images on the Internet.The Information Society 13: 153–161.
Mitchell, K., D. Finkelhor, & J. Wolak. (2003). The exposure of youth to unwanted sexual material on the Internet: A national survey of risk, impact, and prevention.Youth and Society 34 (3): 330–358.
Norris, P. (2001).Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. New York: Cambridge Unviersity Press.
Peek, C., D. Wittred, & D.A. Gay. (1982). “Pornography: Important political symbol or limited political issues?”Sociological Focus 13: 41–52.
Potter, G. (1989). The retail pornography industry and the organization of vice.Deviant Behavior 10: 233–251.
Rimm, M. (1997). Marketing pornography on the information superhighway: A survey of 917,410 images, descriptions, short stories, and animations downloaded 8.5 million times by consumers in over 2000 cities in forty countries, provinces, and territories.Georgetown Law Journal 83(5): 1849–1934.
Sherkat, D., & C. Ellison. (1997). The cognitive structure of moral crusade: Conservative Protestantism and opposition to pornography.Social Forces 75: 957–981.
Smith, T. (2003). American sexual behavior: Trends, demographic differences, and risk behavior. (GSS Topical Report number 25). National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago.
Smith, T. (1990). The sexual revolution?Public Opinion Quarterly 54: 415–435.
Stern, S., & A. Handel. (2001). Sexuality and mass media: The historical context of psychology’s reaction to sexuality on the Internet.The Journal of Sex Research 38 (4): 283–291.
Sundholm, M. (1973). The pornographic arcade: Ethnographic notes on moral men in immoral places.Urban Life 2: 85–104.
Thornburgh, D., & H. Lin (Eds.) (2002).Youth, pornography, and the Internet. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press.
Tewksbury, R. (1990). Patrons of porn: Research notes on the clientele of adult bookstores.Deviant Behavior 11: 259–271.
Tibbetts, S., & M. Blankenship. (1999). Explaining citizens’ attitudes toward pornography: Differential effects of predictors across levels of geographic proximity to outlet sources.Justice Quarterly 16: 735–763.
United States Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. (1970). Final Report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
United States Department of Justice. (1986). Attorney General’s Commission on Pornography Final Report. Volumes 1 and 2. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Waskul, D. 2002. The naked self: Being a body in televideo cybersex.Symbolic Interaction 25 (2): 188–227.
Weatherford, J.M. (1986).Porn row. New York: Arbor House.
Weinberg, M., & C. Williams. (1980). Sexual Embourgeoisment? Social Class and Sexual Activity: 1938–1970.American Sociological Review 45: 33–48.
Williams, L. 1989 (1999).Hard Core: Power, Pleasure, and the “Frenzy of the Visible.” California: University of California Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buzzell, T. Demographic characteristics of persons using pornography in three technological contexts. Sexuality & Culture 9, 28–48 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908761
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908761