Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting yield and survival of cells when suspensions are subjected to centrifugation

Influence of centrifugal acceleration, time of centrifugation, and length of the suspension column in quasi-homogeneous centrifugal fields

  • Published:
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goals of the centrifugation of cell suspensions are to obtain the maximum yield of cells with minimum adverse effects of centrifugation. In the case of mechanically sensitive cells such as mouse sperm, the two goals are somewhat contradictory in thatg-forces sufficient to achieve high yields are damaging, andg-forces that yield high viability produce low yields. This paper mathematically analyzes the factors contributing to each goal. The total yield of pelleted cells is determined by the sedimentation rate governed by Stokes’ Law, and depends on the relative centrifugal force, centrifugation time, size and shape of the cells, density of the cells and medium, viscosity of the medium, and the length of the column of suspension. Because in the situation analyzed the column is short relative to the rotor radius, the analysis considers the centrifugal field to be quasi-homogeneous. The assumption is that cells are not damaged during sedimentation, but that they become injured at an exponential rate once they are pelleted, a rate that will depend on the specific cell type. The behavior is modeled by the solution of coupled differential equations. The predictions of the analysis are in good agreement with experimental data on the centrifugation of mouse sperm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Katkov, I.I. and Mazur, P. (1998) Influence of cetrifugation regimes on motility, yield and cell associations of mouse spermatozoa.J. Androl. 19, 232–241.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mortimer, D. (1994)Practical Laboratory Andrology. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Songsasen, N., Betteridge, K. J., and Leibo, S. P. (1997) Birth of live mice resulting from oocytes fertilized with cryopreserved spermatozoa.Biol. Repord. 56, 143–152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lam, D. M., Furrer, R., and Bruce, W. R. (1970) The separation, physical characterization, and differentiation of spermatogonial cells of the mouse.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 65, 192–199.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Meistrich, M. L., Bruce, W. R., and Clermont, Y. (1973) Cellular composition of fractions of mouse testis cells following velocity sedimentation separation.Exp. Cell. Res. 79, 213–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wyrobek, A. J., Meistrich, M. L., Furrer, R., and Bruce, W. R. (1972) Physical characteristics of mouse sperm nuclei.Biophys. J. 16, 811–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tanford, C. (1961) Frictional coefficient of solid spheres and ellipsoids, inPhysical Chemistry of Macromolecules, Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, NY, pp. 326–328.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Miller, R. G. and Phillips, K. J. (1963) Separation of cells by velocity sedimentation.J. Cell Physiol. 73, 190–202.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Happel, J. and Brenner, H. (1965) The setting of orthothropic bodies, inLow Reionolds Numbers Hydrodynamics, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 220–223.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cummings, J. M. and Woodall, P. F. (1985) On mammalian sperm dimension.J. Reprod. Fertil. 75, 153–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor I. Katkov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katkov, I.I., Mazur, P. Factors affecting yield and survival of cells when suspensions are subjected to centrifugation. Cell Biochem Biophys 31, 231–245 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02738241

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02738241

Index Entries

Navigation